Woodland Trust Worried About Early Springs

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

You may have heard a cringeworthy advert on the radio recently from the Woodland Trust.

It features a woman putting on a soppy voice droning on about the “climate crisis”. She is advertising this campaign:

The climate crisis is having a profound impact on nature. It’s urgent that we understand how wildlife is coping with shifting seasons, warmer temperatures and unpredictable weather patterns. 

Climate change has already accelerated spring’s arrival by an average of 8.4 days compared to the early 1900s. Now, we need you to help us find out whether the signs of spring are changing too.

Let us know whether you’ve spotted any of spring’s three vital signs – frogspawn, a singing song thrush or flowering blackthorn. Your records are crucial in helping us understand current threats and how climate change is affecting the health of nature.

So don’t wait – scroll down to submit your records before 31 March 2025 and play your part in nature’s recovery. 

https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/visiting-woods/things-to-do/natures-calendar/springs-vital-signs

Is that the extent of the crisis then? Spring coming 8 days earlier than a century ago?

In other words, we now typically get the sort of temperatures on 1st March that our great grandfathers had on the 8th March!

Or to put it another way – Oxford now gets the same temperatures in spring that London had a century ago.

And this is causing a “profound impact” on nature? Seriously?

In any event, as we have always known, nature does not do averages. Spring temperatures have swung up and down by as much as three degrees from year to year. Yet nature seems to have managed perfectly fine.

Indeed it is arguable that spring weather is much more predictable now than in earlier decades:

But the facts don’t fit with the Woodland Trust’s climate agenda.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/gn7UZ6s

March 12, 2025 at 04:06AM

Roger Pielke on NOAA Staff Cuts

By Paul Homewood

From the Telegraph:

 image

The US government’s weather agency has been dismantled by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) after it was accused of peddling “misinformation”.

Hundreds of weather forecasters at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were fired last week as part of Donald Trump’s plans to slash the federal workforce.

In total, at least 800 civil servants are thought to have lost their jobs, including meteorologists, radar specialists and crews of hurricane hunters, who fly aircraft into storms to help forecasters, according to CBS.

The job cuts have triggered protests at the agency’s headquarters in Maryland, with some scientists and lawmakers warning that removing staff involved in predicting natural disasters will “endanger American lives going forward”.

Prof Roger Pielke, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on the politicisation of science, said that the agency is “reaping the whirlwind” for “cutting corners on science”.

“By not upholding the highest standards of scientific integrity, we’ve opened the door to politicians meddling,” he said.

Read the full story here.

The Telegraph, however, don’t mention the fact that there are 12,000 staff at NOAA, so a cut of 800 is hardly “torn apart”. Moreover as I wrote last week, the 800 are all probationary workers, so are hardly vital to operations.

As with our Met Office, there are huge swathes of the NOAA operation who are surplus to the basic functioning of the organisation – not least those whose job is to push the climate agenda.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/JEeKjSG

March 12, 2025 at 03:53AM

Time to save the “Wild West” from wind

Gabriella spoke to members of the Albany County Conservancy, a local conservation group, about the economic and environmental threats that 20+ proposed projects pose to southern Wyoming, and in particular on golden eagles.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/hDzmyMe

March 12, 2025 at 03:27AM

SHOULD YOU BELIEVE A SCIENTIFIC PREDICTION?

 News media love to come up with an apocalyptic headline, like the one in this article. They should usually be taken with a very large pinch of salt"

Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists | Real Climate Science

via climate science

https://ift.tt/kzU61LX

March 12, 2025 at 02:43AM