Cloud cover decline may be driving Earth’s record temperatures, say researchers


We recently featured this — Nikolov and Zeller: Analysis showing Earth’s climate is driven by Sun and cloud albedo. Now, some confirmation from climate experts [sic] as we’re told there’s ‘a new round of studies that suggest fewer clouds are playing a big role’ (in global warming). More like *the* big role?
– – –
Global temperatures clocked in at roughly 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial averages in both 2023 and 2024, says Phys.org.

While climate experts say some of the rise can be explained by a weather pattern called El Niño that causes unusual Pacific Ocean warming along with decreasing air pollution that cools Earth, they agree that those factors alone don’t explain the record heat.

Simply put: Earth is taking in more heat than it’s releasing—an energy imbalance that drives global warming.

Enter a new round of studies that suggest fewer clouds are playing a big role.

“Clouds are a huge lever on the climate system,” Andrew Gettelman, an affiliate scientist at the University of Colorado at Boulder told The Washington Post, reacting to the studies. “A small change in clouds could be a large change in how we warm the planet.”

A German team recently reported in the journal Science on the effects of a dramatic drop in low-altitude cloud cover.

Cloud cover matters: Not only do clouds reflect sunlight and cool off Earth, they also reflect infrared radiation back to the Earth’s surface.

Which part of that functioning wins out, The Post reported, depends on the type of cloud and how high it is. And when it comes to cooling things off, people know from experience that low, fluffy cumulus clouds do a better job than high, thin cirrus clouds.

At a recent science conference, a team of NASA researchers reported that three areas of clouds have narrowed significantly—one around the equator and two around stormy mid-latitude regions in the northern and southern hemispheres.

Cloud cover in these regions is shrinking by about 1.5% per decade, helping fuel warming, according to a preprint of their research. It is under review at Nature Portfolio and should be regarded as preliminary until published.

Lead researcher George Tselioudis, a climate scientist at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, told The Post that general warming may be constraining these cloud-heavy regions—thus heating the planet.

“We’ve always understood that the cloud feedback is positive—and it very well could be strong,” he said. “This seems to explain a big part of why clouds are changing the way they are.”
. . .
The key finding: Earth’s albedo was the lowest since 1940, and that contributed about 0.2 degrees Celsius to record heat in 2023. That, researchers pointed out, is roughly equivalent to levels of warming that scientists have been unable to explain.

“This number of about 0.2 degrees fairly well fits this ‘missing warming’,” Goessling told The Post.

Researchers aren’t sure why this is happening—and climate models show different changes that make predictions “really tricky,” Goessling said.

No matter the cause, he said, one thing is certain: “We have a really strong climate signal—and from year to year it’s getting stronger.”

Full article here.
– – –
Cumulus clouds from above [image credit: Jakec @ Wikipedia]
***
Researchers’ pre-print: Contraction of the world’s storm-cloud zones the primary contributor to the 21st century increase in the Earth’s sunlight absorption.

From the abstract (peer review pending):
The results show that the circulation component of the cloud radiative changes, which manifests itself as a contraction of the midlatitude storm zones and the tropical rainy zone, is the dominant term in the solar reflection trend causing decreased sunlight reflection of 0.37 W/m2 per decade. The discovery of this component provides a crucial missing piece in the puzzle of the 21st century increase of the Earth’s Energy Imbalance and points to the large effect that even small atmospheric circulation changes have on the Earth’s warming climate.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/ZNALxTa

February 20, 2025 at 04:03AM

Governor Newsom has transformed California into a national energy drain

California lacks the necessary port capacity, coastal storage, pipelines, or refinery facilities to support a continued shift in the fuel supply chain toward imports.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/nPTBx9H

February 20, 2025 at 03:58AM

£62 Million From Taxpayers For Wooden Bottles

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Ian Magness

It’s only taxpayers’ money!!

From the Telegraph:

 

 

image

Britain’s National Wealth Fund, which is fully owned by the Treasury, on Wednesday announced a £43.5m investment into Cambridgeshire-based start-up Pulpex, which makes recyclable water bottles out of wood pulp.

The investment will help finance Pulpex’s plan to build its first ever manufacturing plant, near Glasgow, which is expected to produce 50m wooden bottles each year and create 35 jobs in Scotland.

The wood-based bottles have a lower carbon footprint than plastic or glass and Ian Murray, the Scottish Secretary, said the investment would “aid the decarbonisation of our packaging industry and help accelerate our net zero goals as we drive delivery of clean power by 2030”.

The Scottish National Investment Bank, which is fully owned by the Scottish Government, is investing £10m alongside the National Wealth Fund and Pulpex ultimately hopes to raise £62m.

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, hailed the investment as “welcome news” that was “creating jobs, sustainable growth and opportunity in Scotland”.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/19/taxpayer-cash-ploughed-wooden-bottles-labours-net-zero/

For some reason the Telegraph treats this as a serious idea, and not the scandalous waste of taxpayer money.

£62 million for 35 jobs? That’s nearly £2 million a job. It’s utterly crazy.

And Pulpex will need will need to chop down a lot of trees, which will do far more damage to the environment that a bit of carbon dioxide from glass or plastic.

The whole idea is flawed anyway – who is actually going to bother recycling these wooden bottles anyway?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/SYVQe2r

February 20, 2025 at 03:23AM

So Mainstream: Los Angeles Times reposts Milloy on X

via JunkScience.com

https://ift.tt/8qmrRol

February 20, 2025 at 01:59AM