Friday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/DVLnqMu

January 30, 2025 at 08:44AM

It’s Time To Purge The Climate Scam From The Federal Websites

From the MANHATTAN CONTRARIAN

Francis Menton

On November 12, 2024 — a week after the election — I had a post titled “Ideas For An Incoming Trump Administration: Climate And Energy Edition.” The first subject covered in that post was “Communications.” I stated there:

[C]hanging the communications of the prior administration should be an easy and obvious first priority. However, the Trump people notably did a poor job on this subject the first time out. The subject of climate and energy is pervasive through the websites of dozens of federal agencies.

I had followed the EPA website in particular during the first Trump term, and it had been little changed even a year after Trump took office.

This time around, Trump and his people are doing a far better job of hitting the ground running on many issues. That is notably true in the area of climate and energy communications: a week in, there are already some meaningful changes at the websites of various agencies. However, changing communications on these issues is not a small task; the government websites during the Biden era had pervasive climate propaganda in thousands of locations.

So, a week into the new administration, here are some of the things that have either changed or not so far.

Department of Energy

My November post noted that there was a big section, dominating the Department’s website, titled “Combating the Climate Crisis.” Today, if you go to the Department’s opening web page, it’s quite different. The front page headline is “Restoring Energy Dominance,” followed by “President Trump’s Day One Actions will Return the Department to Regular Order.” Here’s how it starts:

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), effective today, is ending the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) pause and returning to regular order following direction given by President Donald J. Trump to “unleash American Energy Dominance.”

Another big front-page topic back in November was “Energy Justice.” Today, if you go to the link that I had then for “Energy Justice,” you will be taken back to the opening page with the headline “Restoring Energy Dominance.” The whole “Energy Justice” thing seems to have disappeared. That’s great progress. On the other hand, if you go to the old November link for “Combatting the Climate Crisis,” you will find that a page full of the old Biden-era claptrap is still up:

There is no greater challenge facing our nation and our planet than the climate crisis. That’s why President Biden has laid out the boldest climate agenda in our nation’s history—one that will spur an equitable clean energy economy and cement America on a path to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. . . .

To their credit, the old links to this stuff on the introductory page are gone, and using the site’s search function doesn’t turn this up. Likely, it will be memory-holed shortly.

And yet there is still plenty of junk stuff up on this website that needs to go. As a few examples:

  • A section on “Decarbonization” (“The shift to a low-carbon economy will be one of the most significant economic transformations in history. Through the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) decarbonization initiatives, the United States is poised to capture the economic and other benefits of revolutionary decarbonization technologies.”)
  • A section on “Carbon Management” (“Carbon management encompasses a suite of technologies used to capture, transport, convert, and store carbon dioxide, as well as remove it directly from the atmosphere.”)
  • A section on the “Floating Offshore Wind Shot” (“The Floating Offshore Wind Energy Shot™ seeks to reduce the cost of floating offshore wind energy by more than 70% by 2035 for deep water sites far from shore.”)
  • A section on the “Net Zero Economy” (“A net-zero economy averts or removes as much greenhouse gas as it produces. Achieving this balance by 2050 is a pivotal undertaking for the United States”)

And there are many more such. So there is a long way to go. However, they have made a reasonable start. Given that it has only been a week, I would rate the effort an A-.

EPA

In my November post, I noted that there was a huge Climate Change section of the website that dominated from the opening page. Today, references to the subject on the opening page are gone. If you look under the tab “Environmental Topics” on the opening page, you will not find “climate change,” and if you try the closest topic on that tab, “Air,” you will not find “climate change” there either. They certainly are not making this easy!

However, if you type the words “climate change” into the search function of the site, the first link that comes up is https://ift.tt/V1mqIES, which is the exact same address I had back in November. It will take you to the old Climate Change section of the website that appears to be changed little if at all. It’s buried, but still very much still there. And it contains plenty of the same old nonsense. Examples:

  • They continue to pretend that CO2 in the atmosphere has something to do with “human health”: Understanding and addressing climate change is critical to EPA’s mission of protecting human health and the environment.
  • There are sections on things like “Causes” and “Impacts” of climate change that pretend that this is a huge human-caused problem.
  • Endless pages on climate change “indicators” pretend to link all the usual extreme weather events, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, etc., etc., to human use of fossil fuels. (“Rising global average temperature is associated with widespread changes in weather patterns. Scientific studies indicate that extreme weather events such as heat waves and large storms are likely to become more frequent or more intense with human-induced climate change.”)

There are vast amounts of stuff here that need to go sooner rather than later. Yes, it has only been a week. Still, I rate the effort a B.

NOAA/NASA

These are the people who keep track of the weather and climate data, and are famous for scare-mongering with endless press releases and hype about “warmest day/month/year ever.” My November 2024 post had this link to a typical NOAA release from January 2024, titled “2023 was the world’s warmest year on record, by far.” That link is still live at the NOAA website.

Overall, it is not clear to me that the NOAA or NASA websites have yet changed much if at all. The “News” tab of the NOAA website has a list of “Latest News Releases” that include several last-minute initiatives of the Biden-Harris administration, including this gem: “Biden-Harris Administration, NOAA invest $15 million to help protect Western U.S. communities from wildfire.”

Go to the NASA website, and down at the bottom of the opening page you will find a link for “Earth & Climate.” At that page you will find a further link for “Climate Change,” that is as full of climate propaganda as any government page I have seen. Small excerpt:

There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause. . . . While Earth’s climate has changed throughout its history, the current warming is happening at a rate not seen in the past 10,000 years. . . . The current warming trend is different because it is clearly the result of human activities since the mid-1800s, and is proceeding at a rate not seen over many recent millennia.

You get the idea. Somebody needs to start paying attention to this quickly. Yes, it has only been a week. Still, I would give this effort a C at best.

I’ll be watching these pages for periodic updates from time to time. I can’t wait to see a lot of this stuff disappear.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/orfS9qy

January 30, 2025 at 08:01AM

Yet Another Lithium Battery Fire

By Paul Homewood

 

 

 

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/DmiFqPO

January 30, 2025 at 05:54AM

Winterbourne No 2 DCNN4405 – A Met Office Parody of extraneous heat sources.

52.45640 -1.92763 Met Office CIMO assessed Class 5 Installed 3/2/2011

Winterbourne No 2 weather station is a modern fully equipped automatic reporting unit located in the Edgbaston area of Birmingham and is associated with the University of Birmingham. It is assessed as the lowest possible CIMO standard of Class 5 defined as having “additional estimated uncertainty added by siting up to 5 °C. As is self evident from the above image, the site is somewhat compromised by the nearby busy Edgbaston Park Road, significant areas of “heat sink” hard standing and paths and, of course, the greenhouses. All of these pale into insignificance compared to the mind bogglingly perverse reasoning of the UK Met Office.

In aerial view the site looks poor and given that this is a newly relocated site I wondered firstly how bad must the old site have been to warrant this one and also why, in such recent times, could the Met Office not at least make some attempt to improve things. Firstly the old site had been vastly superior to the new choice as seen below in 2003. {reference coordinates 52.45445 -1.92438} This was possibly as good as it could be anywhere in the UK’s second largest city – a guestimate Class 3 or maybe even better.

Site development had understandably enforced relocation (and further increased the huge Birmingham Urban Heat Island) but such a major downgrade to the new site seems highly questionable. Viewing the site at ground level only reveals the proximity of more problems.

This view may possibly foreshorten distances but that tall hedge actually runs ESE to WNW and casts a lot of shadow. The walling is on the eastern flank above the pathway and together they will be enhancing absorption of morning sunshine. The wind break effect of the hedge and trees lining the whole area when added to the greenhouses create almost a cauldron effect of trapped and artificially warmed air similar to a walled garden. This is in the horticultural college of the University after all.

But NONE of the above represents the perverse parody regarding extraneous heat sources I headlined.

To understand the situation here (and for those possibly not familiar with my previous reviews) the comments made regarding both Amersham and the further Met Office supplied “reasoning” at Bingley No 2 should be held in mind. In these examples the Met Office has chosen to locate weather stations in extremely close proximity to 400kV volt electricity sub stations with transformers known to be emitting thermal energy measured in multiples of millions of watts. My conservative calculations came to a minimum of 5MW confirmed by research showing consideration of using such large amounts of heat sufficient to run large scale district heating systems. The Met Office response quite astonishingly completely dismissed this huge extraneous heat source as irrelevant because it fell outside their predetermined “exclusion” zone of just 3 metres. As well as electricity sub stations, gas turbine exhausts or fighter aircraft engines can blow an inferno straight onto a Stevenson screen but as long as it is coming from more than their very short set distance away, it effectively does not exist.

So consider this line from the Met Office themselves regarding Winterbourne No 2.

The Met Office has taken steps to (presumably) reduce the number of junction boxes on the screen stand down to just one to “REDUCE THE NUMBER OF HEAT SOURCES”

For the benefit of those at the Met Office reading this, the SI Prefix for 106 ( million) is Mega with the symbol “M”. The prefix for 10-3 (thousandth) is milli with the symbol “m”. The difference in these units is a factor of one billion. The waste heat from electricity substation transformers (typically 0.5% of load) is measured in MW and they can handle thousands of MW of electrical load. The waste heat from low voltage electrical junction boxes (insignificant) is measured (if detectable) in mW and for small scale electronic appliances these will only handle an electrical load of a few watts.

No rational person would concern themselves with probably infinitesimal levels of immediate waste heat dissipating from the stand whilst totally ignoring massive heat sources at a fraction over 10 feet away.

But of course for the Met Office all those multiple MW are over 3 metres away whilst those single digit mW are close by and they have to abide by the rules – don’t they? Well no the site is Class 5 junk anyway so why bother. You could not make it up but they do.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/7EIAgWi

January 30, 2025 at 05:51AM