Fossil Fuels and Greenhouse Gases Climate Science

Paper prepared by Richard Lindzen, William Happer, Steven Koonin and submitted April 16, 2024.

Summary provided below and the entire paper can be accessed here: Lindzen Happer Koonin climate science 4-24.

THERE WILL BE DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE POOR, PEOPLE WORLDWIDE, FUTURE GENERATIONS AND THE WEST IF FOSSIL FUELS, CO2 AND OTHER GHG EMISSIONS ARE REDUCED TO “NET ZERO”

  • CO2 is Essential to Our Food, and Thus to Life on Earth
  • More CO2, Including CO2 from Fossil Fuels, Produces More Food.
  • More CO2 Increases Food in Drought-Stricken Areas.
  • Greenhouse Gases Prevent Us from Freezing to Death
  • Enormous Social Benefits of Fossil Fuels
  • “Net Zeroing” Fossil Fuels Will Cause Massive Human Starvation by Eliminating Nitrogen Fertilizer

THE IPCC IS GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AND THUS ONLY ISSUES GOVERNMENT OPINIONS, NOT SCIENCE

SCIENCE DEMONSTRATES FOSSIL FUELS, COAND OTHER GHGs WILL NOT CAUSE CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING AND EXTREME WEATHER

  • Reliable Science is Based on Validating Theoretical Predictions With Observations, Not Consensus, Peer Review, Government Opinion or Cherry-Picked or Falsified Data
  • The Models Predicting Catastrophic Warming and Extreme Weather Fail the Key Scientific Test: They Do Not Work, and Would Never Be Used in Science.
  • 600 Million Years of COand Temperature Data Contradict the Theory That High Levels of COWill Cause Catastrophic Global Warming.
  • Atmospheric CO2 Is Now “Heavily Saturated,” Which in Physics Means More CO2 Will Have Little Warming Effect.
  • The Theory Extreme Weather is Caused by Fossil Fuels, CO2 and Other GHGs is Contradicted by the Scientific Method and Thus is Scientifically Invalid

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/q91wBAg

May 13, 2024 at 08:03AM

Biggest Solar Farm In Wales Planned

By Paul Homewood

 

Meanwhile Wales Online inform us that a new solar farm will power 100,000 homes:

 

 image

image

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/wales-biggest-ever-solar-farm-planned-to-power-100-000-homes/ar-BB1m5p0i

Maybe somebody ought to explain to those 100,000 homeowners that they will only have electricity for a few hours a day in summer, not even that in winter.

If it goes ahead, the project will receive over £150 million in subsidies, based on current prices. That’s £1500 for each of those lucky homeowners.

No wonder NextEnergy are keen to get to get involved.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/2kd0rLp

May 13, 2024 at 06:43AM

Storm Ravages World’s Largest Floating Solar Plant, Takes It Offline Days After Launch

By Paul Homewood

 

I wonder whose bright idea that was?

 

 

 image

https://twitter.com/OzaNandini/status/1777941616562733520

image

The concept of floating solar power is taking on water after a storm knocked a new Indian project offline only a few days after it began operations.

What has been described as the world’s largest floating solar plant at Omkareshwar Dam was badly damaged when a storm hit in mid-April.

Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation said the plant will be back in operation soon, but no firm date was announced, according to the Times of India.

The damaged floating plant is one of three developed near the dam. The storm that damaged it had winds reported at 50 kph, which is just over 31 mph.

Those winds are actually relatively tame. According to the National Weather Service, “extreme” wind threats feature winds approximately ranging from 74 mph to 95 mph. In fact, the NWS actually doesn’t consider winds under 39 mph to be of much threat, at all.

https://ijr.com/storm-ravages-worlds-largest-floating-solar-plant-takes-offline-days-launch/

The idea that this is repairable seems ludicrous, as the panels themselves must surely be badly damaged.

And even if it is, what is the point when a a bit of wind knocks it for six again?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/nAbUOPa

May 13, 2024 at 06:23AM

Battle of the skies as airlines fight over impact of contrails on the climate


This report summary says ‘Vapour trails conundrum resurfaces’. Cloud formation plays an uncertain part in the debate, for example. An experiment using AI found that real time route selection could play a part in reducing the supposed ’emissions’ problem. Proposed financial penalties for airlines are inevitably resisted, but they’re up against net zero climate obsession.
– – –
Airlines are usually rather good at presenting a united face to the world, particularly when it comes to lobbying global policymakers, says The Telegraph.

But a recent move by the EU to clampdown on so-called contrails, the vapour that spews from an aircraft’s jet engines in a thin cloud-like formation, has set carriers at each other’s throats.

The International Air Transport Association (Iata), which counts most of the world’s flag-carriers among its members, has lobbied Brussels to limit the mandatory monitoring of contrails to only flights within the bloc, in an effort to ease the burden of data collection.

But it has stoked the ire of low-cost operators including EasyJet and Ryanair.

The two carriers, which get almost all of their revenue from intra-European services, argue that it would be perverse to ignore contrails produced by long-haul flights when the rule comes in next year.

“Unless the full global scope of monitoring is retained, the science will be incomplete and the places in which contrails are estimated to be most abundant will be excluded,” says David Morgan, chief operating officer at EasyJet.

The clash speaks to concerns that financial penalties or requirements for jets to follow diversionary routes may be focused on those regions where data gathering takes place.

The EU’s CO2 emissions trading scheme is itself confined to flights within the European Economic Area after pushback from overseas carriers.

However, the public row between airlines has distracted from more fundamental questions about just how much contrails affect global temperatures in the first place.

While carriers worldwide have pledged to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050, they are far less accepting of potential measures for reducing the production of contrails.

That stance is based partly on a unique property of the vapour trails. While scientists find that they contribute to global warming by aiding the formation of high-altitude clouds that stop heat from escaping the atmosphere, they have other benefits.

Under certain conditions they can equally reflect solar energy back into space, preventing it from reaching the surface and helping to cool the planet.

Iata cites research suggesting that, on average, 14pc of flights leave contrails, of which close to 30pc may have a cooling effect.
. . .
The EU’s stance is particularly important because the bulk of contrails are found in Europe and the US, and along the North Atlantic flyway between them, a “goldilocks zone” where the temperate climate coincides with some of the world’s busiest skies.

The supercooled air pockets that give birth to contrails are generally at too high an altitude in tropical areas and too low at the poles for aircraft to encounter them, while the temperate areas of the southern hemisphere are comparatively lacking in flights.

Full article here.
– – –
Image: Boeing 767 flight deck [credit: Continental Airlines]

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/R1o8q2K

May 13, 2024 at 04:59AM