Month: May 2017

$7.5bn worth of coal-fired power plants planned for Vietnam

$7.5bn worth of coal-fired power plants planned for Vietnam

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

$7.5bn worth of coal-fired power plants planned for Vietnam

May 30, 2017

By Paul Homewood

 

Vietnam is to set to go ahead with three new coal power plants, to be financed by Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia.

From PEI:

 

image

The Vietnamese government is set to approve investment licenses for three coal-fired power plants worth a combined $7.5bn.
The country continues to rely on coal power and hydropower to securely meet the country’s annual
electricity demand growth of 11 per cent.
Two of the projects by Japanese, South Korean and Saudi Arabian investors are expected to receive licences ahead of Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc’s visit to Japan next month, investment minister Nguyen Chi Dung told Reuters on Tuesday.

Details provided by the investment ministry showed South Korea’s Taekwang Power Holdings Co. and Saudi Arabia’s ACWA Power would invest $2.07bn for a 1,200 MW thermal power plant.
Each investor would have a 50-percent stake in the plant and commercial operation is expected to start in 2021.
Japan’s Marubeni Corp and Korea Electric Power Corp would invest $2.79bn in a 1,200-megawatt plant, with operation expected to start in 2021. The investors will also share half of the investment each.
Japan’s Sumitomo Corp would invest about $2.64bn into a 1,320 MW plant, with an expected starting date of 2022, the ministry said. This project was expected to get its licence later this year, the ministry said.

http://ift.tt/2rfkeZQ

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

May 29, 2017 at 09:21PM

Producers not Consumers Now Control the UK Electricity System

Producers not Consumers Now Control the UK Electricity System

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

From GWPF:

 

image

A recent press statement by the United Kingdom’s Transmission System Operator (TSO) shows that the consumer interest is no longer in the driving seat. The system is now run for the convenience and benefit of electricity producers.

On Friday afternoon last week National Grid issued a widely reported statement to the effect that at lunchtime on that day the instantaneous output from the United Kingdom’s nearly 12 GW of solar photovoltaic generation was 8.7 GW, which just over 24% of the load at that time and a new record.

National Grid developed its theme thus:

An increase in renewable generation poses an exciting challenge for National Grid, whose role as system operator is to balance the national transmission network, by ensuring supply and demand is matched second by second.

Duncan Burt, who’s responsible for control room operations said: “We now have significant volumes of renewable energy on the system and as this trend continues, our ability to forecast these patterns is becoming more and more important.

“We have an expert team of forecasters who monitor a range of data, to forecast just how much electricity will be needed over a set period.”

Duncan added: “We have planned for these changes to the energy landscape and have the tools available to ensure we can balance supply and demand. It really is the beginning of a new era, which we are prepared for and excited to play our part”.

Clearly written in haste so as not to miss the moment (“who’s responsible”), this incoherent statement reveals that National Grid is still coming to terms with a genuinely novel situation, one that they can hardly believe, so extraordinary and so favourable is it to their company’s future. It is certainly “exciting” for them, commercially exciting.

Hitherto, forecasters have indeed been concerned with predicting “just how much electricity will be needed”, but as the previous paragraphs show with the advent of a renewables dominated grid they are now engaged on forecasting what is about to be produced. The significance of this change cannot be overstated. The consumer has become a secondary consideration; and the producer interest is now the main focus of National Grid’s attention. Of course, though it has a regulated income and asset base, National Grid is itself part of that producer interest. The grid management “tools” to which Mr Burt refers, software, personnel, and hardware are expensively purchased with consumer funds, but without consumer consent. National Grid will balance the system brilliantly, of course, but very expensively.

If the United Kingdom is to flourish, this mistaken inversion of priorities must be addressed by the next government. The Conservative Party Manifesto remarked that:

A successful industrial strategy requires competitive and affordable energy costs. We want to make sure that the cost of energy in Britain is internationally competitive, both for businesses and households. (p. 22)

One can hardly imagine that sensible people in the other political parties hold any other views. This is motherhood and apple pie. However, as National Grid’s release shows, policies have in fact over the last decade or so, forced the consumer into a subordinate and powerless position, one where it is very unlikely that energy costs will be either competitive or affordable.

The implications for inward investment and the reindustrialisation that many now seem to desire are obvious. Where will an investor prefer to place capital in the hope of generating a return? An economy where electricity demand drives supply, or one where the System Operator forecasts supply and then adjusts demand accordingly? Even if there are rewards on offer for flexible consumers, the truth is that most businesses would prefer complete freedom of operation rather than a compromised liberty and the occasional lollipop.

http://ift.tt/2quKVwt

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

May 29, 2017 at 09:21PM

East European States Mount Revolt Against Paris Agreement

East European States Mount Revolt Against Paris Agreement

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

East European EU states are mounting a behind-the-scenes revolt against the Paris Agreement, blocking key measures needed to deliver the pledge that they signed up to 18 months ago.

Image result for visegrad group climate

Under the climate accord, Europe promised to shave 40% off its emissions by 2030, mostly by revising existing climate laws on renewables, energy efficiency and its flagship Emissions Trading System (ETS).

But documents seen by Climate Home show that Visegrad countries are trying to gut, block or water down all of these efforts, in a rearguard manoeuvre that mirrors president Donald Trump’s rollback of climate policy in Washington.

Energy efficiency is supposed to make up around half of Europe’s emissions reductions by 2030, but a Czech proposal could cut energy saving obligations from a headline 1.5% a year figure to just 0.35% in practice.

Below the radar, Poland has also launched a manoeuvre that may block the EU’s winter package in its entirety – particularly a planned limit on power plant emissions – if it is signed up to by a third of EU parliaments, or 10-13 states.

The EU’s various wings will eventually thrash out a compromise between the commission’s original proposal – which was calibrated to meet the Paris pledge – and the counter-proposals designed to weaken this.

The effect this could have on the EU’s overall emissions has raised concerns among those in Brussels who wish to see the EU maintain its leadership on climate.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 29, 2017 at 08:58PM

Going all sci-fi?

Going all sci-fi?

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

This afternoon, the BBC’s Costing the Earth show is going to be looking at  global warming and  what it means for plants and food.

Between 20 and 33% of the world’s plant species are currently at risk of global extinction. That’s the estimation of recently published studies. So how much will climate change impact on the variety, availability and price of the food on our plates? 

It’s going to be interesting to see whether the presenters will touch on relevant issues such as the gentle decline in drought during the twentieth century.  However, reading on, it seems that telling a good story is perhaps a bigger concern in their minds than telling a fair and balanced one:

Botanist James Wong investigates the links between global warming and the rate at which crops are able to adapt and evolve to rapidly changing conditions…Having deeper roots and more efficient water-use strategies is a clear bonus, and one that’s being addressed by British plant scientists who are developing more drought-resistant wheat varieties by breeding them with ancient antecedents of one of the world’s most important crops.

Rapidly changing conditions? Who is he trying to kid? It looks as though it might be best enjoyed as science fiction.

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 29, 2017 at 08:51PM