IPCC obviously thinks ‘the science is settled’ Piers. A cute way of avoiding discussion of recent literature? e.g. https://t.co/m0XLER0AvS
— Rog Tallbloke (@RogTallbloke) August 9, 2017
Clearly the science is settled so far as the IPCC is concerned. Or maybe they don’t want a discussion of recent peer reviewed literature which casts doubt on their pet greenhouse theory?
Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller’s peer reviewed paper:
New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model
Asks some serious questions of the mainstream theory, and until these are answered, the science is most definitely not ‘settled’.
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
August 9, 2017 at 07:48AM
Iowa Climate Science Education 