Here’s The Inconvenient Truth Behind MIT’s Study Linking Hurricane Harvey To Global Warming

By Paul Homewood

 

It was only a matter of time before some junk scientist blamed Hurricane Harvey on global warming.

It is probably no surprise either that it comes from Kerry Emmanuel.

Fortunately Michael Bastach has been quick to tear it to pieces:

image

A new study is making waves in the media, claiming to finally address the question of man-made global warming’s role in Hurricane Harvey’s record-setting rainfall.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) professor Kerry Emanuel, a renowned hurricane expert, and his colleagues published their findings on Monday, claiming global warming increased the of risk Hurricane Harvey-level rainfall in southeastern Texas grew since the last century.

There’s one huge caveat: Emanuel didn’t actually study Hurricane Harvey itself.

Instead, Emanuel’s study is based on thousands of climate model runs to find out the odds a storm will bring the amount of rainfall Hurricane Harvey did when it made landfall in late August 2017.

Emanuel told The Daily Caller News Foundation his study didn’t analyze any of the particulars that made Hurricane Harvey so devastating. “Yes indeed … that is the case,” Emanuel told TheDCNF.

Instead, his study models the statistical likelihood of Harvey-level rainfall based on a linear projection of how storms could change under a scenario with massive amounts of global warming.

Hurricane Harvey broke Texas rainfall records when it hit, dumping large amounts of rain over the greater Houston area for about five days. Cedar Bayou, outside Houston, saw nearly 52 inches of rainfall, breaking an all-time U.S. record.

Emanuel concluded there’s “a sixfold increase” in the odds of Harvey-level rainfall pummeling Houston in any given year. Emanuel estimated an 18 percent chance of Harvey-level rainfall by the end of the 21st Century.

At one point, Emanuel noted “Harvey’s rainfall in Houston was ‘biblical’ in the sense that it likely occurred around once since the Old Testament was written.”

But special circumstances were at play for Hurricane Harvey.

Harvey’s rainfall was only able to break records because it stalled over Texas, blocked by a high pressure ridge in the west. The high pressure ridge kept Harvey over Texas longer than it otherwise would have, concentrating rainfall over a smaller area.

“There is no question that the extraordinary magnitude of Harvey’s rain was mostly because it stalled,” Emanuel told TheDCNF.

Media coverage of the study glossed over this inconvenience, with The Washington Post reporting that “Climate change upped the odds of Hurricane Harvey’s extreme rains, study finds.”

The Atlantic ran with the ridiculous headline: “Global Warming Really Did Make Hurricane Harvey More Likely.” Apparently the writer didn’t read the study itself.

Some climate scientists were quick to blame global warming for Hurricane Harvey’s devastation. Climate scientist Michael Mann said warmer-than-normal temperature in the Gulf of Mexico gave Harvey more power and allowed it to hold more moisture, but other scientists were quick to shut him down.

So far, scientists have found little to no evidence global warming is having an impact on hurricanes. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found in March 2017 that it’s “premature to conclude that human activities — and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming — have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity.”

Emanuel was one of the scientists who came out linking Harvey’s devastation to global warming. Now, he’s published a study on this.

Studies like this usually take time to get published, but Emanuel “decided to use his status as a member of the National Academies of Science, which let him pick his own peer reviewers, who were likely to be friendly and get the review done quickly,” Ars Technica reported.

That means the “findings probably haven’t faced as rigorous a review as they might have,” Ars Technica reported, but it does show Emanuel is confident in his hurricane modeling, which has already been peer-reviewed. Emanuel’s study was funded, in part, by the National Science Foundation.

Emanuel said he and his colleagues were looking into the atmospheric factors that could be increasing the likelihood of Hurricane Harvey-like events.

“Early results indicate that some of it comes from increased moisture in a warmer atmosphere but some of also arises from increased probability of storms stalling because of weak atmospheric flow. Hope to have some concrete results before long,” he said.

http://ift.tt/2zAuCC9

 

It is actually extremely worrying that somebody like Emmanuel can pick his own peer reviewers, as this corrupts the whole scientific process.

It was Emmanuel who was outed in 2012 as a Director of AlphaCat Fund Ltd, which specialises in reinsurance for natural catastrophes. Exactly the sort of business that would benefit from ramping up of climate hysteria.

Although he now no longer appears to be linked to AlphaCat, he has declared in this latest paper that he is an officer with a company called WindRiskTech. According to their website:

WindRiskTech, L.L.C., was founded in 2005 to provide estimates of tropical cyclone wind risk for any point on the globe, using the most advanced techniques available.

How much more revenue will they earn, if clients are encouraged to believe that hurricanes are getting much worse?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

http://ift.tt/2zZzocP

November 15, 2017 at 06:39AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: