The Russian-Green Collusion Story The Media Ignores

Russian funding of U.S. environmental groups shows how collusion is done.

Last week, a congressional committee released a jarring and persuasive report on Russian meddling in American politics. Despite a media feeding frenzy over anything tangentially connected to questions of Russian interference, this report went largely unnoticed.

The U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology Committee’s “Russia’s Social Media Meddling in U.S. Energy Markets” details Russian funding of U.S. environmental groups, which used resources to protest the process of fracking and the existence of the Keystone pipeline. Russia, the world’s largest oil producer, figures to watch the U.S. surpass it within five years. Killing fracking and the pipeline stand as two ways for Russia to avert this fate.

Rep. Lamar Smith, the chairman of the committee, describes the “mechanics of Russia’s scheme to use nonprofit entities to influence U.S. public policy and public opinion” with regard to oil and gas and the fracking process. Smith points out that “publicly available reports connect the dots” between U.S. environmental groups and a Bermuda-based shell company known as Klein Ltd. that operates as a “pass through” organization for foreign funds.

Attorneys with a law firm called Wakefield Quin created Klein Ltd. in March 2011, Smith’s letter explains. The two outfits share the same Bermuda address and they appear to be one in the same. Smith identifies top officials with Wakefield Quin who held “directorship positions” with IPOC group, owned by Leonid Reiman, a Russian minister of telecommunications close to Putin. Smith also points out that a Wakefield Quin administrator and a senior counsel have held positions with Spectrum Partners, a holding company based out of the law firm’s office with an investment portfolio that includes the “Spectrum Russia Absolute Fund.”

The Washington D.C.-based Environmental Policy Alliance has published a report titled “From Russia with Love” that goes into further details about the Russian connection with the Bermuda shell company and the law firm. The findings of the Environmental Policy Alliance builds on a July 2014 report from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that identifies the San Francisco-based Sea Change Foundation as the major conduit for Russian funding of U.S. environmental groups.

IRS 990 forms show that Klein Ltd contributed $23 million to Sea Change in 2010 and again in 2011, which is about half of all contributions Sea Change received during that same time period. These same 990 forms show that Sea Change then distributed more than $20 million in grants in 2010 and 2011 to environmental organizations “to promote awareness of climate change,” “reduce reliance on high carbon energy,” “educate the public about climate and clean energy,” and “promote climate and clean energy communications.”

Recipients of these Sea Change grants during this two-year period include the Energy Foundation, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club Foundation, the League of Conservation Voters Education Fund, the Tides Foundation, the Union of Concerned Scientists, the World Wildlife Fund, and the Virginia Organizing Project.

Nathaniel Simons and his wife, Laura Baxter-Simons, established the Sea Change Foundation in 2006. Simons is the son of James Simons, founder of the New York-based Renaissance Technologies hedge fund and a major benefactor of the Democratic Party. The single biggest recipient of Sea Change Foundation grants since 2006 is the San Francisco-based Energy Foundation, which has received about $64.8 million. That’s instructive because the 2014 Senate report describes the Energy Foundation as a “pass through” public charity that donates to environmental activist groups. The purpose of a “pass through” organization such as the Energy Foundation, according to the Senate report, is “to create the appearance of a more diversified base of support” and to “shield” donors from accountability.

Some of the largest recipients of Sea Change Foundation funding such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, the League of Conservation Voters, and the Union of Concerned Scientists have also received millions of dollars, and in some instances, tens of millions of dollars, from the Energy Foundation. See what’s happening here?

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

March 9, 2018 at 03:17AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: