U.S. Supreme Court Orders Pause in Landmark Climate Change Case

The Supreme Court has taken the unexpected step of pausing a landmark climate change lawsuit brought by 21 young people, which had been trudging through the legal system since 2015.

Several young plaintiffs and their families had already planned to live in Eugene, Oregon, during the now-delayed trial—which was set to begin in a lower court in the state on Oct. 29—in order to stay on track in school. (Chris Pietsch /The Register-Guard via AP)

Late last week, as Brady Dennis reports for the Washington Post, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. ordered a stay in the suit Juliana v. US, which was supposed to go to trial on October 29 at the United States District Court in Oregon. The Chief Justice’s order marks yet another surprising turn in what has proven to be an unusual and contentious legal case. Michael Gerrard, an environmental law professor at Columbia University, tells Dennis that it is “extremely rare, if not unprecedented” for Supreme Court justices to enjoin a trial that is still making its way through the lower courts.

“Ordinarily they’ll wait for the lower court to rule,” Gerrard adds.

It is not clear how long the stay will be in effect, according to John Schwartz of the New York Times.

The lawsuit’s plaintiffs, who range in age from 11 to 22, argue that U.S. government policies have contributed to climate change, thereby denying them their “fundamental” right to a healthy environment. Young people, they say, are the ones who will have to contend with the potentially catastrophic effects of global warming should nothing change, and so their lawsuit seeks to compel the government to limit its support for fossil fuel extraction and support policies that will curb greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. government, the president and various other official departments and agencies are named as defendants.

Both the Obama and Trump administrations have tried to put a stop to the lawsuit, arguing that the court is not the right place to deal with this matter. The case is “an attempt to redirect federal environmental and energy policies through the courts rather than through the political process,” as Trump administration lawyers wrote when they made their last-minute effort to persuade the Supreme Court to intervene in the case, according to Dennis. But lower courts had previously allowed the lawsuit to go ahead.

A main source of contention is whether or not a safe climate should be considered a civil right. “I have no doubt that the right to a climate system capable of sustaining human life is fundamental to a free and ordered society,” Judge Ann Aiken, who was scheduled to hear the case on the 29th, wrote in a 2016 ruling that dismissed a motion to halt the lawsuit.

But others disagree. Jeffery Wood, a Justice Department attorney, recently said during a law conference that the right to a safe climate “simply does not exist,” reports Vox’s Umair Irfan.

The fact that the Supreme Court has stepped in to stop the lawsuit, even if temporarily, is “certainly a signal that the court is uncomfortable with the underlying legal theory of the Juliana case,” Ann Carlson, a professor of environmental law at the University of California Los Angeles, tells Irfan.

What happens next remains to be seen.

Full post

The post U.S. Supreme Court Orders Pause in Landmark Climate Change Case appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)


October 25, 2018 at 11:05AM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s