Florida Rep. Carlos Curbelo, who supports a carbon tax, was among defeated House Republicans who are part of a caucus set up to push global warming policies.
Curbelo conceded to Democratic candidate Debbie Mucarsel-Powell on Tuesday night. Conservatives say the defeat of Curbelo, who’s called a GOP “leader” on global warming, shows how carbon taxes are still “politically toxic.”
“Curbelo could and should have been re-elected but he was talked into pushing an energy tax on all Americans — the so-called carbon tax — and as a result voters kicked him out of office,” Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), said in a statement.
Curbelo’s concession was just the tip of the iceberg when it came to defeats for Republicans in the Climate Solutions Caucus (CSC), a bipartisan group meant to put forward policies aimed at addressing global warming.
Caucus members defeated by their Democratic opponents included Barbara Comstock of Virginia, Scott Taylor of Virginia, Daniel Donovan of New York and Peter Roskam of Illinois.
ATR called Curbelo’s defeat “yet another sign that carbon taxes are politically toxic.”
For critics, Curbelo’s loss echoes the primary loss of former South Carolina GOP Rep. Bob Inglis in 2010. Rep. Trey Gowdy handily defeated Inglis in the primary, largely because of Inglis’ support for a carbon tax.
Curbelo introduced legislation in July to tax carbon dioxide emissions at $23 per ton, which would mostly go towards the Highway Trust Fund. Few elected Republicans support a carbon tax.
However, Curbelo’s support for a carbon tax only earned him attacks from the right and left. The free market American Energy Alliance bought attack ads against Curbelo, and environmental groups backed his opponent.
“He was savaged by groups including the Sierra Club and Tom Steyer’s NextGen America, which endorsed his Democratic opponent,” Steve Milloy, a Trump transition team member, said in an emailed statement.
The post Climate Caucus Republicans Suffer A String Of Election Defeats appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).
via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
November 7, 2018 at 03:26AM