MasterResource in the News (problems of wind power)

“ is where the ‘grassroots’ anti-wind power movement that Bradley works tirelessly to promote merges with the fossil fuel industry’s astroturf campaign against renewable energy.” (Dave Anderson, Energy and Policy Institute, April 17, 2019)

Perhaps I am a tireless worker. But no, the pushback against industrial wind turbines is not from “astroturf” but from on-the-spot, victimized people. In this sense, MasterResource comes from the grassroots, not the tree tops.

Mr. Anderson’s writeup, “Koch-backed blog defends Trump’s false claim about windmills & cancer,” takes a look at this site with this background: is a project of the Institute for Energy Research (IER), a group that together with its advocacy arm the American Energy Alliance has received millions of dollars from the Koch network, as well as money from the coal, oil and gas industries.

Regular contributors to, which launched in 2008, include Robert L. Bradley, the founder and CEO of IER and AEA, and a Who’s Who of climate change skeptics and “grassroots” anti-wind power activists.

I hold no title with IER’s advocay arm, AEA. And why the labels, when critics can simply challenge MasterResource’s public policy orientation toward

  • Consumer protection;
  • Taxpayer welfare;
  • Ending business/government cronyism; and
  • Private property, free markets and the rule of law.

To these ends, MasterResource’s 2,600 posts from hundreds of different authors (all of whom speak for themselves) educate readers about the economic and environmental advantages of dense, reliable energies.

Yes, government-dependent noisy, unsightly, resource-intensive, intermittent, uneconomic wind turbines are on trial. To this end, Mr. Anderson should visit a turbine site where people reside to see and hear for himself what is happening outside of the Beltway.

Mr. Anderson should be on our side, not on the bandwagon of crony wind developers. But as the joke goes,

Q. When is an environmentalist not an environmentalist?

A. When it comes to industrial wind power and solar plants.

Much of Anderson’s post consists of so-what facts in a guilt-by-association argument.

IER and are one source of this disinformation. The blog has for years been promoting the views of anti-wind activists like John Droz of the Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions, who also recently sent out a newsletter to his followers defending Trump’s false claims about wind turbines and cancer. After the 2016 election, Droz wrote about his personal connections inside the incoming Trump administration.

Lisa Linowes of the New Hampshire-based Industrial Wind Action Group is another “principal” contributor to Linowes joined IER’s newly formed Advisory Council in December, and she also serves as a senior fellow for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, another group backed by Koch money that’s fighting a war against wind power in the Lone Star state and has close ties to the Trump administration.

Tom Stacy, who serves on the National Wind Watch’s board of directors, was an Ohio-based anti-wind activist contributor who became a paid consultant for IER and other special interest groups backed by the fossil fuel industry. Travis Fisher, a former IER staffer, continued to email with Stacy about attacks on renewable energy in Ohio after he joined the Trump team at the Department of Energy.  

And heaven forbid:

The coordination between IER and anti-wind activists has gone beyond online communications. In 2013, for example, IER hosted an anti-wind event in Washington, D.C., featuring Linowes, Stacy, and Kevon Martis of the Interstate Informed Citizens Coalition.

Many individuals and organizations have stepped in where don’t-want-to-know, double-standard Washington DC environmentalists (all well paid) refuse to tread. And it is these real environmentalists who have emerged (many not paid) against the perils of quite unnecessary, government-dependent industrial wind.

Back to Mr. Anderson’s post:

In 2016, Bradley marked the eighth anniversary of with a blog post that celebrated the contributions of the “grassroots talent fighting against industrial wind turbines.” Since then, he’s been busy defending anti-wind operatives like Droz, Stacy, and Martis, all of whom have cozy partnerships with special interest groups backed by the fossil fuel industry.

I am reminded of the saying that at first they ignore you and then they attack you…. We can take it. And regarding the content of each post, we welcome critical comments so long as they are in good taste.

The grassroots anti-wind power movement is making a difference, a big difference, and MasterResource is in the news.

The post MasterResource in the News (problems of wind power) appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

April 24, 2019 at 01:20AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: