Month: February 2020

Climate Prediction: “Take-off distances will get longer as the climate warms”

British Airways Aircraft at Heathrow AirportBritish Airways Aircraft at Heathrow Airport
British Airways Aircraft at Heathrow Airport. By aeroprints.com, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Climate Scientists predict Global Warming will be bad for air travel – but their claims ignore human adaption.

Climate change means longer take-offs and fewer passengers per aeroplane – new study

February 14, 2020 2.23am AEDT

Guy Gratton Associate Professor of Aviation and the Environment, Cranfield University

Paul D Williams Professor of Atmospheric Science, University of Reading

As the local climates at airports around the world have changed in the past few decades, the conditions that pilots have relied on in order to take off safely have changed too. Our new research suggests that higher temperatures and weaker winds are making take-off more difficult. In the long run, this means that airlines are delivering fewer passengers and cargo for the same amount of fuel.

“Climate” essentially means the average weather conditions at any given place. Scientists know this is changing, but not uniformly. While global temperatures have risen by about 1°C on average, some places have warmed by much more already – and others may be getting cooler.

But climate change isn’t just about temperature – winds are slowing down and changing direction around the world too. This is a problem for airport runways that were built many years ago to align with the prevailing winds at the time. 

Research has predicted that take-off distances will get longer as the climate warms. This is because higher temperatures reduce air density, which the wings and engines need to get airborne. With reduced headwinds, aeroplanes also need to generate more groundspeed just to get into the air. Once they’re up there, they’re subject to in-flight turbulence, which is getting worse due to climate change increasing the energy in jet stream winds. 

That could mean that airlines must reduce the numbers of passengers they carry on flights, or search for ways to lengthen their runways. In some extreme cases, it could become impossible for some aeroplanes to use some airports altogether. This is another reminder of how rapidly and extensively human actions are transforming the world around us, and how ill equipped we are to deal with the consequences.

Read more: https://theconversation.com/climate-change-means-longer-take-offs-and-fewer-passengers-per-aeroplane-new-study-131613

The abstract of the author’s study;

The impacts of climate change on Greek airports

Guy Gratton, Anil Padhra, Spyridon Rapsomanikis, Paul D. Williams
First Online: 13 February 2020

Time series of meteorological parameters at ten Greek airports since 1955 indicated the level of climate change in the Eastern Mediterranean area. Using this data, take-off performance was analysed for the DHC-8-400—a typical short range turboprop airliner, and the A320, a typical medium scale turbofan airliner. For airports with longer runways, a steady but unimportant increase in take-off distances was found. For airports with shorter runways, the results indicate a steady reduction in available payload. At the most extreme case, results show that for an Airbus A320, operating from the, relatively short, 1511m runway at Chios Airport, the required reduction in payload would be equivalent to 38 passengers with their luggage, or fuel for 700 nautical miles (1300 km) per flight, for the period between the A320’s entry to service in 1988 and 2017. These results indicate that for airports where aeroplane maximum take-off mass is a performance limited function of runway length, and where minimum temperatures have increased and/or mean headwind components decreased, climate change has already had a marked impact on the economic activity in the airline industry. Similar analyses could be usefully carried out for other runway-length–limited airports, which may often include island airports. It is also noted that previous research has only considered temperature effects, and not wind effects. Wind effects in this study are less significant than temperature, but nonetheless have an effect on both field performance noise and pollution nuisance around airports.

Read more: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-019-02634-z

Why am I disputing the predictions of a professor of aviation?

For starters, the body of their study expresses a lot less certainty that anthropogenic climate change is responsible for the observed changes than is suggested by the press release. From body of the main study;

In Greece, in particular, the wind speed at 20 measurement sites at a height of 2 m has decreased over the period 1959–2001, consistent with our findings at airports. A possible explanation for these wind trends is that anthropogenic climate change is warming the poles faster than the tropics in the lower atmosphere, weakening the mid-latitude north-south temperature difference and consequently reducing the thermal wind at low altitudes (Lee et al. 2019). Another possible explanation is that anthropogenic climate change is expanding the Hadley cells, pushing the fast winds associated with the storm tracks towards the poles and away from the midlatitude regions. A final possible explanation is an increase in surface roughness, caused by an increase in vegetation or (in our case) development around the airports.

Read more: Same link as above

I have personal experience flying an aircraft. “Surface roughness” has a huge impact on low altitude wind speed. “Surface roughness” should have been their first theory, not wild speculation about Hadley Cells or reduced latitudinal temperature differences, especially given recent observational evidence that away from “surface roughness”, global windspeed is actually increasing.

Urban heat island from all that development might also explain much of the observed rise in temperature at the airports in the study.

What about the other points the professors make? Their calculation of the impact of wind speed and temperature on aircraft performance look reasonable, temperature and wind speed do have a significant effect on aircraft.

But the authors of the press release did not explain that their study ignores human adaption to changed circumstances.

If local warming at the airports and reduced wind speed does start to have a significant impact on the ability of aircraft to operate in some regions, aviation companies will not simply abandon profitable routes whose airfields which are causing them operational difficulties. Aircraft manufacturers will respond to new requirements by upgrading the aircraft; by modifying the engines to deliver more thrust on takeoff, or by adjusting aircraft wings to provide greater lift for difficult takeoffs.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/2HrUbYw

February 15, 2020 at 12:02PM

UK Getting Wilder, Wetter Weather? Data Says Not

By Paul Homewood

 

As we keep being reminded, global warming will bring wetter, wilder weather to the UK more often.

Except that the facts tell the opposite story:

 image

Climate change?

Scientists are wary of saying climate change has caused a specific event such as Storm Ciara. And they are divided on the impact global warming could have on the jet stream, which whips up storms and drives them towards the UK.

But scientific modelling suggests stronger winds and heavier rainfall could be in store for the UK as a result of climate change. A warmer atmosphere holds more moisture, making heavy rain and flooding more likely in the years to come. In 2017 researchers concluded the heavy rainfall brought by Storm Desmond, which caused widespread flooding in December 2015, was made 60 per cent more likely by climate change.

https://inews.co.uk/news/environment/storm-ciara-climate-change-effects-uk-weather-rain-temperature-1396513

Perhaps instead of playing with their silly little models, these so-called scientists might bother to check the actual data:

image

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/data/download.html

Analysis of the Met Office’s England & Wales Precipitation Series shows no such trends, either in terms of frequency or severity in winter months.

As can be seen, by far the wettest day was 3rd December 1960:

image

 image

image

https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/IO_95067ea8-24bf-42f4-bae7-7a5953abc79b/

S Wales was particularly badly affected by floods, but the south and midlands of England were also hit.

Winds reached 68Kts (78mph) on the south coast during that storm, and gales were a common occurrence throughout the month.

December 1960 was not a one-off, four of the six heaviest rains occurred between 1960 and 1979.

In the last ten years, there have been eight days with >15mm of rainfall, below the series average of 1.03 a year.

As for wild weather, even the Met Office have had to admit that they can find no trends over the last five decades. Indeed, their graph clearly shows a decline in storminess since the 1990s:

image

 image

 image

https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.6213 

But where climate science is concerned, models always trump facts!

Fr

For perspective, when the S Yorkshire floods hit last November, the average rainfall over England & Wales was 12.19mm on Nov 6th and 5.42mm on the 7th when Sheffield had its heavy rainfall.

The reason the national total was relatively low was because the really heavy rain got stock over the Midlands.

The rainfall during Storm Desmond in December 2015 was even more tightly focussed over a tiny area. Over England & Wales, the rainfall totalled just 4.66mm on the 5th, when most of the rain dropped on Cumbria.

These examples perhaps offer an insight into just how severe the rainfall was in December 1960.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/2OXRlhP

February 15, 2020 at 11:39AM

Week in review – science edition

by Judith Curry

A few things that caught my eye this past week.

On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolurion in recent coupled model ensembles [link]

Greenland’s largest glacier (Jakobshavn) has rapidly thickened since 2016. Thickening has been so profound the ice elevations are nearly back to 2010-2011 levels. The nearby ocean has cooled ~1.5°C – a return to 1980s temperatures.  https://the-cryosphere.net/14/211/2020/tc-14-211-2020.pdf

Could the Atlantic overturning circulation shut down? [link]

Could climate change and deforestation spark Amazon ‘dieback’? [link]

Update: Are CMIP6 models running too hot? [link]

An ice sheet’s footprint on ancient shorelines [link]

Are ocean currents speeding up or slowing down? [link]

Cold water on hot models [link]

Southern California climate change over 100,000 years [link]

Energy budget constraints on historical radiative forcing [link]

Jim Hansen:  climate models versus the real world [link]

CO2 fertilisation effect on plant growth bigger than in previous studies: improved attribution of current terrestrial carbon sink. [link].

The deglaciation of the Americas during the last glacial termination [link]

Impact of sea ice floe size distribution on seasonal fragmentation and melt of Arctic sea ice https://the-cryosphere.net/14/403/2020/

Competing Topographic Mechanisms for the Summer Indo‐Asian Monsoon [link]

Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw [link]

A new (2020) 5680-year tree-ring temperature reconstruction for southern South America – the longest ever for the Southern Hemisphere – shows the warmest era of the last millennium was the 1700s-1800s. The region has had no net warming from 1979-2009. https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379119306924

Sea level pressure has, historically, worked as a better predictor of continental US #hurricane damage than maximum sustained wind: https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0062.1

The contrasting response of outlet glaciers to interior and ocean forcing [link]

New research article: Interannual variability of summer surface mass balance and surface melting in the Amundsen sector, West Antarctica https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-229-2020

Policy & technologies

Welcome to the era of supercharged lithium-ion batteries [link]

We need to get serious about ‘critical materials’ [link]

The green swan [link]

Cutting ozone-generating gas emissions from the largest human-made sources, including road transportation and energy production, could improve conditions for plants, allowing them to grow faster and capture more carbon, [link]

A climate catastrophe in Scotland 300 years ago contributed to widespread famine, an (unsuccessful) attempt to colonize Panama, and unification with England. [link]

For most things, recycling harms the environment [link]

Pielke Jr.: Why You Can’t Trust The Insurance Industry’s Secret Science On Climate Catastrophes [link]

“Weather, Climate, and Catastrophe Insight: 2019 Annual Report” http://aon.com/catastropheinsights

How much is a climate solution ‘worth’? [link]

About science & scientists

Model explanation versus model-induced explanation [link]

How the clouds got their names and how Goethe popularized them with his poems [link]

Climate scientists are not priests or prophets [link]

Pielke Jr:  Blacklist – the pernicious shenanigans of SkS [link] How academic blacklists impede climate research

The jerks of academe [link]

What happens when badly needed science is ignored? People get hurt. Undone Science: When Research Fails Polluted Communities https://undark.org/2020/02/03/undone-science-pollution-avalon-shenango/

via Climate Etc.

https://ift.tt/38vcXd3

February 15, 2020 at 10:07AM

Weekend Unthreaded

Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/3byGvbM

February 15, 2020 at 09:00AM