Fossil Fuel Subsidies–The Truth

By Paul Homewood

 

The CO2 coalition have published a new paper, analysing the question of fossil fuel subsidies:

 

 

Executive Summary

A number of studies claim that pervasive subsidies provide an unfair competitive advantage to fossil fuels over renewable energy. Many estimates have been made of the value of direct and indirect subsidies provided to fossil fuels, the most extreme being the 2015 study by the International Monetary Fund estimating fossil fuels subsidies at $5 trillion annually.

On examination, many of the direct subsidies in this study turn out to be generally available to other businesses, and most of the value of the indirect subsidies is estimated from uncertain projections of future damages from fossil-fueled global warming, which are discussed in detail in a previous CO2 Coalition White Paper, The Social Cost of Carbon and Carbon Taxes: Pick a number, any number. The most thoughtful and transparent evaluations of subsidies are those of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a European-based coalition of 36 market economies, and its International Energy Agency (IEA). Many of the roughly 2,200 items listed by the OECD as “subsidies” are debatable. However, focusing on subsidies alone obscures the real policy issue, which is whether government policy in total reduces fossil fuel prices below their hypothetical market level and whether these distortions occur in markets where renewables are trying to compete.

To address this issue, this White Paper (a) distinguishes “subsidies” from “externalities,” (b) includes taxes in the calculation, and (c) makes proper geographic distinctions. Taking these factors into account, the paper concludes that, even taking at full value the direct subsidies cited by the OECD and IEA, fossil fuels are significantly overtaxed and not unfairly advantaged in most countries of the world.

In fact, although most countries do offer some subsidies to fossil fuels, as outlined in the OECD data, the massive taxes imposed by most governments are generally far higher, resulting in a net increase in the price of fossil fuels. Taking into account all taxes and subsidies, fossil fuels in the United States are overtaxed by an estimated $50 billion per year. The 28 other largest industrial democracies (most of the European countries, Canada, South Korea, New Zealand and Australia) are overtaxed an estimated $363 billion, and the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) are overtaxed an estimated $104 billion. The primary exceptions to this rule are found in oil-producing developing countries that offer their citizens heavily subsidized motor fuels but are not likely candidates for renewable energy.

The principal researcher for this White Paper is Bruce Everett, Ph.D. During his 45-year career in international energy, Dr. Everett was an economist with the U.S. Department of Energy and an executive with ExxonMobil.
He taught energy economics at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service for ten years and was also an Adjunct Associate Professor of International Business at the Fletcher School of Tufts University for 17 years.

http://co2coalition.org/publications/do-government-policies-favoring-fossil-fuels-hamper-the-development-of-wind-and-solar-power/

 

The paper begins by critiquing the conventional approach of calculating subsidies, used by the IMF and OECD:

 

image

 image

It then proceeds to point out that taxation also needs to be taken account of:

  image

A detailed look at the US shows that fossil fuels are actually overtaxed by $60bn a year – in other words this is the amount raised by taxation OVER AND ABOVE standard taxation, such as State sales tax:

 

image

 

 

According to official OECD figures, US hands out annual subsidies worth $10bn to fossil fuels:

image 

 

Meaning net overtaxation of $49bn:

image

 

The study carries out the same analysis for 28 other major industrial countries (excl BRICS), finding overtaxation of $362bn:

image

  

Even the BRICS countries are overtaxing fossil fuels:

 image

 

It appears that fossil fuels only receive net subsidies in oil producing countries, notably Iran, Saudi, Indonesia and Venezuela:

 image

As the report emphasises, it is a nonsense aggregating global subsidies, particularly when the numbers are used to claim that renewable energy is being unfairly penalised.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/39pgTxw

July 25, 2020 at 06:12AM

One thought on “Fossil Fuel Subsidies–The Truth”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s