WHERE Are Greta Thunberg And David Attenborough Now?
Posted: March 13, 2021 | Author: Jamie Spry | Filed under: Climatism, Coronavirus, Hypocrisy | Tags: Climatism, Coronavirus, COVID19, David Attenborough, Eco-hypocrisy, environment, Greta Thunberg, Hypocrisy, Masks, Pollution |
“Action must be powerful and wide-ranging.
After all, the climate crisis is not just about the environment.
It is a crisis of human rights, of justice, and of political will.
Colonial, racist, and patriarchal systems of oppression have created and fueled it.
We need to dismantle them all.”
FOR that matter, where are the cries of “Environmental Justice” from any of the usual suspects? Does caring for the environment only matter when it fits the mainstream media’s current agenda? Their current agenda is most definitely to promote toxic face masks in order to maintain COVID-19 fear and anxiety amongst the community in order to perpetuate the COVID-19 “crisis”. Efficacy and people’s livelihoods be damned.
via Daily Mail Australia :
Face masks are a ‘ticking plastic bomb’: Three MILLION coverings are thrown out every minute and serve as carriers for other toxicants in the environment, experts warn
- Environmental researchers write about the issues disposable masks pose
- Currently there is no established way to decontaminate and recycle them
- Many single-use coverings are being recklessly thrown away and into nature
- Experts call for ways to improve technologies to allow for recycling of masks
PUBLISHED: 00:34 AEDT, 13 March 2021 | UPDATED: 00:34 AEDT, 13 March 2021
Three million face masks are discarded every minute as a result of mass adoption during the coronavirus pandemic, and experts warn it could soon lead to environmental catastrophe.
Face coverings are being worn by the majority of individuals around the world in order to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus which causes Covid-19.
However, they pose a greater risk to the environment than carrier bags because of their ubiquity and the fact there is no way to safely decontaminate and recycle them.
In an article published by the University of Southern Denmark, experts call the huge amount of face masks being worn and thrown away a ‘ticking time bomb’.
They add that littering is causing masks to break down into dangerous microfibres and they may also be carrying harmful chemicals into the environment.
Environmental Toxicologist Elvis Genbo Xu from the University of Southern Denmark and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Zhiyong Jason Ren from Princeton University penned an article on the topic in the journal Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering.
And the conundrum of what to do with the recent deluge of masks truly is a new frontier for scientists, who have never before been faced with such a rapid explosion of a product for which there is no established responsible disposal method.
‘With increasing reports on inappropriate disposal of masks, it is urgent to recognise this potential environmental threat and prevent it from becoming the next plastic problem,’ the researchers warn.
This graphic shows the potential environmental impact of face masks and what they can do to nature if not properly disposed of.
How effective are dehumanising face masks against pandemics/viral transmission?
What “the science” says :
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 0, No 0
About 4,860 participants completed the study. The researchers had hoped that masks would cut the infection rate by half among wearers.Instead, 42 people in the mask group, or 1.8 percent, got infected, compared with 53 in the unmasked group, or 2.1 percent. The difference was not statistically significant.
Dr. Mette Kalager, a researcher at Telemark Hospital in Norway and the Harvard School of Public Health, was persuaded. The study showed that “although there might be a symbolic effect,” she wrote in an email, “the effect of wearing a mask does not substantially reduce risk” for wearers.
What actual observation says :
Judge for yourself …
Charts via the excellent and accurate @ianmSC
March 12, 2021 at 04:41PM