Swiss court rejects ’emergency’ appeal by climate activists

Switzerland’s highest court has rejected an appeal by 12 climate activists convicted of trespassing at a Credit Suisse bank branch, dismissing their argument that they had taken emergency action for a just cause.

The Federal Court verdict is another setback for environmentalists hoping to win backing for the campaign, which had a surprise victory last year when a local court agreed the “imminent danger” of global warming had driven their actions.

That ruling was overturned by an Swiss appellate court, which handed the defendants suspended penalties for the November 2018 incident.

Some of them had dressed in tennis whites to draw attention to tennis superstar Roger Federer’s sponsorship deal with Credit Suisse, which they want him to drop.Report ad

In a verdict released on Friday, the Federal Court said the immediate danger standard was not met in the case because the law meant this to cover events set to occur within hours.

“In this case, the urgency of global warming as such is not to be decided; it is only to be noted that at the moment of the action, there was no current and immediate danger in the sense of the criminal emergency regulation,” it said in a statement.

Full story

The post Swiss court rejects ’emergency’ appeal by climate activists appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum.

via The Global Warming Policy Forum

June 14, 2021 at 01:12AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s