Shouting ‘climate’ in court doesn’t guarantee legal victories. Appeal to the Supreme Court pending.
– – –
Environmental group Greenpeace has lost its case against the UK government over a North Sea oil field permit, reports BBC News.
Permission to drill the Vorlich site off Aberdeen was given to BP in 2018.
Greenpeace argued in Scotland’s highest civil court there had been “a myriad of failures in the public consultation” and the permit did not consider the climate impacts of burning fossil fuel.
The Court of Session ruling means operations will continue at the field. Greenpeace plans to appeal.
The UK government welcomed the outcome.
It follows a two-day hearing into the case last month.
Production from the development started in November after BP was granted approval by the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) in 2018.
Greenpeace said it was the first time an offshore oil permit had ever been challenged in court and that if it had won, the case would have had huge ramifications for other sites, such as the planned Cambo field off Shetland.
Ruth Crawford QC for Greenpeace said UK Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng had been “deprived” of information about the environmental impact of the development.
Ms Crawford said Greenpeace wanted proper public participation in important developments such as the Vorlich oilfield.
Roddy Dunlop QC, representing the UK government, said the challenges advanced by Greenpeace were “largely procedural and opportunistic”.
Jim Cormack, representing oil firms BP and Ithaca, had previously told hearing that the challenge was “highly significant” and if the original decision was overturned, production from the field would have to stop until new consent could be obtained.
He said the works for which consent was granted had been implemented by BP and Ithaca at a cost of about £230m and the project was fully operational and in the production phase.
Full report here.
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
October 7, 2021 at 06:54AM