Detection Of A CO2 Climate Signal In Radiative Forcing Is Again Foiled By Clouds

It so difficult to constrain errors in identifying the cloud impact on Earth’s radiation budget that the orders-of-magnitude smaller radiative impact of CO2 cannot be distinguished from noise.

According to a new study using CERES data, the observed biases in detecting the radiative effects of clouds on climate are 2.5 to 6.25 W/m² for longwave (LW) and shortwave (SW), respectively (Sun et al., 2022). Standard deviations in cloud radiative effects amount to 8 (LW) to 20 (SW) W/m². This variability and built-in estimation error wipes out the isolation of CO2 as a detectable factor in top of atmosphere (TOA) climate forcing.

This is because the cloud radiative effects (CRE) bias and standard deviation values are 15 to 100 times larger than the presumed cumulative surface radiative effects of CO2 forcing over a span of 10 years (0.2 W/m²).

Image Source: Sun et al., 2022

It has long been estimated that when clouds are present they dominate as the driver of greenhouse effect forcing. Quantitatively, the greenhouse effect of clouds is larger than a 100-fold increase in the CO2 concentration (~40,000 ppm).

Image Source: Ramanathan et al., 1989

The shortwave radiative effect of clouds is even larger, with ranges of ±300 W/m² (Sedlar et al., 2022). These values are 3,000 times greater than the total effect of CO2 surface forcing (0.2 W/m²) over a span of 10 years (Feldman et al., 2015).

Image Source: Sedlar et al., 2022

In other words, we might as well be guessing.

via NoTricksZone

October 20, 2022 at 12:17PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s