From Climate Depot

NY Times Guest Essay By Mara Altman: “Short people don’t just save resources, but as resources become scarcer because of the earth’s growing population and global warming, they may also be best suited for long-term survival (and not just because more of us will be able to jam into spaceships when we are forced off this planet we wrecked).” 

“When you mate with shorter people, you’re potentially saving the planet by shrinking the needs of subsequent generations. Lowering the height minimum for prospective partners on your dating profile is a step toward a greener planet.”

#

Flashback: Hollywood film promotes shrinking humans to fight climate change – Echoes other calls to reduce size of people

This sounds eerily similar to other calls to reduce the size of people. 

Flashback: 

NYU Professor: To Stop Climate Change, We Must Genetically Engineer Humans – Make Shorter, Induce Allergies to Meat & Medicate to Create ‘Empathy’

By: Marc Morano – Climate DepotJanuary 4, 2023 2:03 PM

By Mara Altman – Ms. Altman is a writer and the author of “Gross Anatomy.”

Excerpts: …short is better, and it is the future.

“I don’t want tall people to feel bad about themselves,” Samaras said, sincerely, “but the time is right to be short.” … Thomas Samaras, who has been studying height for 40 years and is known in small circles as the Godfather of Shrink Think, a widely unknown philosophy that considers small superior…

…

Parents boast about how their kids “eat them out of house and home” and grow out of shoes the very week a new pair is bought as if it’s a badge of honor. My children eat like gerbils — it’s fine, they are healthy — and because of their low percentiles we save money and food, and they fit into the same pair of shoes for a year. Growing like a weed? No, thanks. I’ll take growing like a cactus.

Short people don’t just save resources, but as resources become scarcer because of the earth’s growing population and global warming, they may also be best suited for long-term survival (and not just because more of us will be able to jam into spaceships when we are forced off this planet we wrecked).

…

When you mate with shorter people, you’re potentially saving the planet by shrinking the needs of subsequent generations. Lowering the height minimum for prospective partners on your dating profile is a step toward a greener planet.

…

In some corners of the world, a celebration of short stature is actually happening. Arne Hendriks, a 6-foot-4-inch lecturer and artist, uses performance and exhibitions to encourage people to embrace fewer inches. He’s even restricted dairy from his sons’ diets and only allows them minimal sugar in an attempt to limit their growth, saving them from the ills of height. “It’s time for tall people to get off our high horses,” Mr. Hendriks said. “Don’t be overly confident when you are tall because you are probably going to die younger, have more health problems and you are polluting more.”

In a comment on I Dream of EV, Mark brings our attention to the latest car sales figures in the UK. Here’s what the BBC said:

New car registrations in the UK fell last year to their lowest level in three decades, new figures show.

Despite a recovery in the second half of 2022, a continuing parts shortage hit production lines.

Meanwhile, demand for electric vehicles continued to grow and they accounted for almost a fifth of new car sales.

For “almost a fifth” read almost exactly a sixth, as Mark pointed out, and the BBC themselves noted further down the page:

Sales of electric cars, meanwhile, continued to grow. They rose from 190,700 to 267,000 – with their market share climbing from 11.6% to 16.6%.

But it was this statement that caught my eye:

The lion’s share of fully electric vehicles were bought by businesses and fleet customers which made up 66.7% of all registrations of this type of car in 2022.

Why might EVs appeal to company car drivers? Well, I thought a few sums might be enlightening. I decided to compare the costs for a company car driver of leasing the best selling car (Nissan Qashqai; ICE) with those of leasing the best selling EV (Tesla Y). Some time later, I thought you, dear reader, might also be interested in the answers. The numbers below may be wrong and are illustrative only (in particular, lease costs might be lower than the illustrations given, if they are under the aegis of a company: these numbers probably relate to private leases). Corrections are welcomed.

It looks to me like you end up paying nearly 80% as much for a car less than half the price under these regulations. Small wonder that a company car driver might opt for an EV. There is also the undoubted benefit of leasing in that you can hand your car back after 3 years in exchange for a new one. One suspects that EVs depreciate as fast as a loaf of bread, because who trusts what the previous owner has been doing to the battery? How many times did they squirt 150kW into it? But there are battery health measures. Sure, but do you believe them? There are lots of new EVs about, and we will have to see what their resale value is in 3 years. I suspect that they will do worse than petrol equivalents, where such exist – we’ll see. [Used prices are high at the moment across the board.]

In the interests of full transparency, let me say here that I have made a couple of assumptions that benefit the EV driver. First, the car is charged at home overnight on an EV tariff. If it were not, the cost of “fuel” would triple. If it was charged at public chargers, then the cost would increase again. Second, relating to the previous point: time of use tariffs (at least the British Gas one I looked at) are not for the faint hearted. You end up paying more for leccy the rest of the time:

On the other hand, I should mention – and this is presumably on the other side of the balance sheet – you will be paid back for business mileage. No doubt this is worth more to the EV driver. (The figure of 10,000 km used above is your personal mileage; if it’s higher then the ICE driver will end up paying more under the conditions here.)

Naturally, manufacturers are going to have to find ways to get punters to choose EVs going forward. Starting in 2024 we have the government’s Zero Emission Vehicle mandate – where a set proportion of each manufacturer’s cars will have to be EVs. (I do not think the figure required has been announced yet.) Of the cars in the top ten sales overall, only the Tesla Y is over 50 grand, and I would guess that the others are all sub 30 grand. The average price paid for one of the top ten selling EVs in the last quarter available – Q3 2022 – was about £44,000, skewed upwards by the abundance of Teslas, but most of the top ten were 30-40 grand:

Having firmly tilted the playing field in their favour, the nappy-wearing DfT cannot help itself but crow about the success of EVs, as for example here:

But the EVs that are selling well at the moment are not for us plebs. Those of us without off-street parking will cling onto our ICE car like we would cling to our fire axe in a zombie apocalypse. [Not that the government has noticed the resistance this particular feature of urban living might inspire.] What about those public chargers?

The SMMT is also warning that the number of public charging points is not increasing quickly enough to reach the government’s target of having 300,000 by 2030.

300,000 is an interesting number. It’s quite a frightening number. It’s about one charger for every 230 people in the UK, not all of whom have cars. Right, but how many petrol pumps are there? About the same number?

According to Statista, the number of petrol stations is 8,378. I’m guessing 8 pumps per station, for a total number of pumps of about 67,000.

Let’s say there are two identical countries. One has 30,000,000 ICE cars and 67,000 petrol pumps.

The other has 30,000,000 EVs and 300,000 public chargers.

The pumps could fuel all the cars in about 1.5 days, if you arranged it nicely. The chargers, let them be 150kW superduperpooperscooper types, could charge all the cars in about 2 days. Quite close. (The chargers would be drawing 45 jiggawatts.) There would be 447 cars per petrol pump, and as every car has to get fuelled at a public pump, each pump would be used 23,300 times a year (letting each car fill up once a week). But there would only be 100 cars per charger, leading us to expect 5,200 uses for each charger per year.

But. Those who can charge at home, do. The government says 80% of charging is done at home. Another site turned up by QuackQuackOops gives that percentage as 95%. Those percentages give you 260-1040 uses of each charger per year: about 1-3 uses per day (64 uses per day for the petrol pump).

In other words, the public chargers are going to be an enormous drain on their owner’s balance sheet – at least until the plebs are forced to abandon their ICE cars and have no choice but to use them.

USUAL ANNOUNCEMENT

I am not against EVs. I am against banning ICE cars. I believe the public are with me on this, and that sooner or later politicians will rescind the ban on EVs. They are probably going to hold out as long as possible, in hopes that all car manufacturers will have swapped their factories over to EV manufacture, thus making a de facto ban.

FEATURED IMAGE

Some EVs that did not make it to the showroom. Reassuring, isn’t it?