Month: September 2023

Texans Left Scrambling For Power As Wind Turbines Take Another Summer Vacation

Texas is littered with solar panels and wind turbines, but don’t expect them to deliver power as and when you need it. As happens most years, wind turbines across Texas have been on their annual summer vacation, for weeks now.

In their absence, solar is able to pitch in for a while, but sunset has this remarkable and dramatic effect on output. Which means that, by the time householders turn on their air conditioners and settle down for an ice cold beer in the evening, almost all of their electricity needs are being covered by gas, coal and nuclear, in that order.

Yet again, a calm and balmy Texan summer has shown the part-time power producers to be utterly meaningless, as Ed Ireland explains below.

The Texas Dunkelflaute
Thoughts About Energy and Economics
Ed Ireland
9 September 2023

The hot Texas wind has been dropping off in the summer afternoons of 2023, sending Texas wind turbines on summer vacation. Solar power has faired pretty well on most days, but when the sun sets every evening, solar power goes to zero. The German word for weather conditions that result in no wind or solar generation is “Dunkelflaute.” The Texas version of Dunkelflaute has occurred many evenings this summer, with some pushing the Texas grid to near collapse.

The operator of the Texas electricity grid, ERCOT, declared an Emergency Level 2 on September 6, 2023, because reserve generation capacity had dropped to less than 1,750 megawatts. The emergency notice said: “ERCOT expects tight grid conditions, requests conservation today from 5 PM to 9 PM CT.” It goes on to explain the reasons underlying the emergency:

  • Heat. Continued statewide high temperatures.
  • Demand. Texas is seeing high demand due to the heat.
  • Solar. Solar generation starts to decline earlier in the afternoon hours towards the end of summer before completely going offline at sunset.
  • Wind. Wind generation is forecasted to be low this afternoon and into the evening hours during peak demand time.

In a nutshell, ERCOT said it is hot this summer, the wind is falling off, and Texans are using a lot of air conditioning just as the sun sets. Nothing new to native and long-time Texans.

Unfortunately, typical summers in Texas now also mean that the tens of thousands of acres of wind turbines and solar panels are going offline early as the days get shorter in late summer, and the wind stops blowing during the hot summer afternoons. This starts as people are getting home and cranking down the air conditioning, starting at about 4 PM and lasting until about 8 PM, which is half an hour after sunset, and solar generation is zero.

Another factor is that the fleet of natural gas-fired generators that always fill the gaps in electrical power when the wind stops and the sun sets has been running all out for months and foregoing regular maintenance. Eventually, maintenance became necessary, and in the case of this emergency declaration, an estimated 10 MW of natural gas generation was offline for maintenance.

When the wind died down, and the sun was setting on September 6, 2023, natural gas came to the rescue, providing two-thirds of the power on the grid (thanks to David Blackmon for this screenshot taken shortly after ERCOT issued the emergency order):

Natural gas generation combined with coal and nuclear provided a whopping 90.6% of total generation on the Texas grid. Without those three dependable workhorses, rolling blackouts would have ensued. Statements that wind power and batteries saved the day are not factual.

The Texas version of a full Dunkelflaute, when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining, is coming next month when a solar eclipse will likely shut down solar power during the day. The 2023 Annual Eclipse on October 14, 2023, will cross North, Central, and South America. Its path will go directly over the prime solar generation country in West Texas, blocking 90% of the sun, according to NASA:

According to NASA, the solar eclipse begins in Oregon at 9:13 AM and ends in Texas at 12:03 CDT so Texas solar power generation will be reduced most of that morning. Of course, a solar eclipse does not occur often, but it will highlight the problems solar power generation faces when cloudy weather reduces solar output.

While rolling blackouts were avoided on September 6, the intermittency of wind and solar highlighted that they depend on the weather. My friend, Robert Bryce, expressed his thoughts to me on this subject:

If we are facing more extreme weather due to climate change, it would be insane to make our most-critical infrastructure dependent on the weather. We need energy and power systems that are weather resilient, not weather dependent.

Truer words were never spoken.

While Texas has the largest installed capacity of intermittent wind and solar power of any state in the U.S., the underlying strength of the Texas power market is that it is deregulated, dating back to 2002 when the Texas legislature fully implemented deregulation, giving consumers the “power to choose” their electricity provider. The basic premise of the ERCOT system was that market-determined prices would encourage power generators to provide the electricity demanded by consumers at the lowest possible price.

That system worked well until heavily subsidized wind and solar generation emerged in the early 2000s. The problem that has now been exposed is that the subsidies for wind and solar result in artificially low prices. As a result, wind and solar operators can sell their electricity at zero or even below zero. That means wind and solar are always first in the queue because they are the low bidders but can drop off at any time due to the weather, as happened on September 6, 2023.

Natural gas generators are expected to provide backup power when wind and solar are unavailable and are occasionally rewarded with peak prices of up to the cap of $5,000 per megawatt, but that occurs only occasionally and briefly. Most of the time, natural gas generators have to take a price below what is needed to maintain existing generation and encourage the development of new power generation. This has resulted in a declining fleet of natural gas-fired electricity generators in Texas.

Add to this the uncertainties of pending federal legislation, such as the EPA “New Source Performance Standards,” which threaten to shut down natural gas generation by 2040. That EPA rule would be devastating to the reliability of U.S. power grids, which was highlighted by pleas from 21 states and all power grids to halt that rule.

The State of Texas wrestled with this problem in the legislative session that ended on May 31, 2023. The state passed legislation to help provide up to 10 gigawatts of new dispatchable thermal generating capacity, most likely powered by natural gas. While that will help avoid rolling blackouts, it will not stop the ongoing problem of near-failures in the Texas power grid caused by intermittent and weather-dependent wind and solar generation.

These situations can be avoided if ERCOT develops new innovative approaches to encourage sufficient natural gas-fired power generation, both base load and peaking. The system that ERCOT proposed in the last legislative session, the “performance credit mechanism,” was rejected by the Texas legislature, but other innovative ideas must be pursued in order to stabilize the Texas grid.
Thoughts About Energy and Economics

via STOP THESE THINGS

https://ift.tt/Diomalt

September 28, 2023 at 02:35AM

NEW OIL FIELD APPROVED BY THE UK GOVERNMENT

The UK government is showing that we will still need oil way into the future by its decision to develop a big new oil field in the North Sea. It is a sensible decision that is driving the climate extremists mad.

 Rosebank: Biggest untapped UK oil field approved by regulators – BBC News

via climate science

https://ift.tt/GN6FRc4

September 28, 2023 at 01:41AM

Climate Alarmism Demoted in One Chart

“The popular climate discussion … looks at man as a destructive force for climate livability … because we use fossil fuels. In fact, the truth is the exact opposite; we don’t take a safe climate and make it dangerous; we take a dangerous climate and make it safe. High-energy civilization, not climate, is the driver of climate livability.”

– Alex Epstein, The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels (2014), pp. 126–127.

Physical climate change in terms of human welfare defines the debate between the alarmists and skeptics. And a good way to begin that debate is to put climate livability and nature in proper context. The quotation above does just that, tearing away the deep ecology notion that nature is benign, optimal, and fragile.

There is one graphic, one data series, that makes Epstein’s point — and puts the climate alarmists and forced energy transformationists on their heels. It is regularly presented with updates from Bjorn Lomborg. “Climate Alarmism vs. Data,” he titles the inquiry.

The Age of Climate Disaster is Here’ [Foreign Affairs]

Data: No Climate-related deaths dropped 98% over a century

2023 climate deaths likely below the lowest 2020s average

https://facebook.com/photo/?fbid=862193625265642&set=a.266716694813341…

Reuter’s “Fact Check

The above chart is a hard one for the climate alarmists to buck. But try they do.

Fact Check: Drop in climate-related disaster deaths not evidence against climate ‘emergency’”, reads the Reuter’s Fact Check headline of September 19, 2023.

Social media posts are recirculating a bar chart that depicts falling numbers of deaths due to weather-related disasters over the last century alongside comments suggesting that the significance of climate-driven weather changes is exaggerated.

Mortality, however, is not a useful measure of the number or severity of weather-related events including the floods, droughts, storms, wildfire, and extreme temperatures listed in the graph, experts told Reuters.

Although deaths from these disasters have decreased, due in part to better forecasting and preparedness, the number, intensity, and cost of climatic and meteorological hazards have all increased over the last hundred years.

Well, what did free market adaptation from wealth and fossil fuels have to do with that? The answer is a lot. But Reuter’s misdirects and obfuscates with these points:

  • It’s improved resilience rather than fewer disasters
  • Climate change negatively affects health in other ways
  • The IPCC says with confidence that heat waves and weather extremes are increasing
  • There are more damages in terms of dollars

The Verdict? “Misleading. Disaster mortality is not a useful metric for quantifying climate change, and climate-related disasters have increased in number, intensity, and economic cost.”

Or maybe not ….

The post Climate Alarmism Demoted in One Chart appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

https://ift.tt/72esjcL

September 28, 2023 at 01:14AM

A new paper shows that U.S. tornado damage & strong tornado incidence are both sharply down

From CLIMATE DEPOT

ROGER PIELKE JR.: A new paper has just been published by Zhang and colleagues — Time trends in losses from major tornadoes in the United States — which updates and extends our 2013 analysis. They find: “[B]oth the severity of damage from individual events and the total annual losses from tornadoes are seen to have reduced over time.”
Their analysis confirms our earlier work: “[O]ur findings reiterate the results of Simmons et al. (2013) who emphasize the importance of normalizing loss data to draw adequate conclusions about the severity of natural hazards.” … 
Zhang et al. also find that the strongest tornadoes have also declined appreciably since 1950. The figure below shows their presentation of trends in tornadoes of various intensities (with F1 the weakest and F5 the strongest). You can see that the incidence of tornadoes of F2 strength and stronger have decreased. In our 2013 analysis we found that ~90% of damage results from tornadoes of F2 strength or stronger.

https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/trends-in-us-tornado-damage-and-incidence

By ROGER PIELKE JR.

Excerpts: In 2011, the United States experienced more than 500 deaths and over $30 billion in losses from tornadoes. As is now common, climate activists were quick to claim that the destructive tornadoes that year were due to climate change. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rejected such claims, advising:

[A]pplying a scientific process is essential if one is to overcome the lack of rigor inherent in attribution claims that are all too often based on mere coincidental associations.

The 2011 tornado season motivated us — Kevin Simmons, Daniel Sutter and I — to take a close look at trends in tornadoes and their impacts across the United States. The result was a peer-reviewed paper with the first comprehensive normalization of U.S. tornado losses, for 1950 to 2011.

Our results surprised even us — U.S. tornado damage and tornado incidence appeared to have decreased dramatically, contrary to conventional wisdom:

The analysis presented in this paper indicates that normalized tornado damage in the US from 1950 to 2011 declined in all three normalization methods applied (two are statistically significant one is not). The degree to which this decrease is the result of an actual decrease in the incidence of strong tornadoes is difficult to assess due to inconsistencies in reporting practices over time. However, an examination of trends within sub-periods of the dataset is suggestive that some part of the long-term decrease in losses may have a component related to actual changes in tornado behaviour. Further research is clearly needed to assess this suggestion.

A new paper has just been published by Zhang and colleagues — Time trends in losses from major tornadoes in the United States — which updates and extends our 2013 analysis. (Published in the journal Weather and Climate Extremes) They find:

[B]oth the severity of damage from individual events and the total annual losses from tornadoes are seen to have reduced over time.

Their analysis confirms our earlier work:

[O]ur findings reiterate the results of Simmons et al. (2013) who emphasize the importance of normalizing loss data to draw adequate conclusions about the severity of natural hazards

Compare their results with ours in the figure below, which I have just updated through 2022.

In the 11 full years following our analysis, 9 of 11 have seen overall below average tornado incidence in the United States — 2023 will wind up slightly above average. There is simply no evidence to support claims that tornadoes are getting worse or causing more damage. In fact, the evidence indicates the opposite and peer-reviewed research is strongly in agreement.

#

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/stqCnah

September 28, 2023 at 12:04AM