Month: March 2024

How Climate Alarmists Profit From The Scare

By Paul Homewood

h/t Dennis Ambler

 image

image

https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/31754/experts-urge-governance-of-planetary-commons-to-manage-climate-change/

Meanwhile the charlatans who are perpetuating this fraud are benefitting very nicely!

image

Johan Rockström, a prominent Swedish scientist and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, has been awarded the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, commonly known as the environmental Nobel Prize. This recognition, initially reported by the Wall Street Journal, includes a $250,000 award and celebrates profound contributions to environmental science, policy and awareness.Graphic representation of the Planetary Boundaries concept. (Image: Courtesy of Tyler Prize.)

Administered by the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, the Tyler Prize honors Rockström for his seminal research on the “Planetary Boundaries” framework. This framework serves as a scientific compass, guiding humanity to maintain the planet within a safe operational zone.

Rockström, whose research is featured in the Netflix documentary “Breaking Boundaries: The Science of our Planet“ with David Attenborough, is acclaimed for pinpointing nine systems essential for Earth’s environmental equilibrium, encompassing freshwater availability, atmospheric ozone integrity and biological diversity. He has meticulously mapped a “tipping point” threshold for each system, underscoring the critical need to respect these limits to prevent irreversible ecological degradation.

“His scientific achievements, coupled with his ability to influence policy and engage with the public, have made an invaluable contribution to our planet’s welfare,” said Tyler Prize Chair Julia Marton-Lefèvre.

The accolade will be formally presented to Rockström on May 17 during a ceremony in Potsdam, Germany. Previous winners include conservationist Jane Goodall and climate scientist Michael Mann.

Instituted in 1973 and stewarded by USC Dornsife, home to USC’s renowned Environmental Studies program and the Wrigley Institute for Environment and Sustainability, the Tyler Prize reflects the university’s deep commitment to environmental research and education, consistent with USC President Carol Folt’s Assignment: Earth initiative.

https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/tyler-prize-for-environmental-achievement-2024-goes-to-johan-rockstrom/

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/0cEMq51

March 6, 2024 at 04:18PM

Experts urge governance of planetary commons to manage climate change

By Paul Homewood

h/t Dennis Ambler

They’re coming for your democracy, but don’t worry, it’s all in your own interest! ( I suppose the clue is in the name – Democracy Without Borders).

image

Earlier this year, an international group of 22 experts from a range of disciplines, including environmental science, governance, and law, emphasized the importance of establishing “planetary commons” in an article published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The group argued that this step is essential for strengthening global governance to “protect the functions of Earth’s biophysical systems in ways that ensure planetary resilience and justice for present and future generations.”

The article introduces the concept of “planetary commons” as a framework to align global law and governance with the science of the Earth system. The consequences of climate change are worsening globally, and there is presently no effective governance system in place to address the issue. Instead, nations have developed their own policies for climate change, each motivated by national-level pressures and interests, often misaligned with other nations and the global goal of a sustainable Earth. According to the authors, however, if “essential systems and processes are perturbed beyond critical thresholds, they can undergo irreversible state shifts with potentially dire consequences for life on Earth.” For this reason, it is necessary to develop “collective global scale solutions that transcend national boundaries.”

The authors argue that “planetary commons governance” should involve integrating, in a “nested” manner, “formal and informal, higher- and lower-level, established and self-organized, but reasonably coordinated, governing entities.” They stress that an “overarching institution” would be needed that serves as a “universal point of aggregation.” A starting point could be the United Nations General Assembly, despite its “state-based approach that grants equal voting rights to both large countries and micronations,” which “represents outdated traditions of an old European political order.” For this reason, the article states, “novel arrangements, such as weighted voting or the addition of a United Nations Parliamentarian Assembly or a Global Deliberative Assembly might be needed to make governance at the planetary scale more representative, legitimate, just, effective, and reflective.”

The scale of climate change and the extreme inequity of its impact are therefore a central and urgent argument for global democracy. Countries primarily in the global North, that have been industrialized for many decades, are responsible for aggregated carbon emissions that predominantly cause damage to countries in the global South. Recently, the Climate Governance Commission endorsed the creation of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly as a central feature of just climate change governance that is able to preserve the stable state of the Earth system.

Johan Rockström, the lead author of this article, is regarded as a leader across efforts for global sustainability and is presently co-director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, professor of Earth system science at the University of Potsdam, and professor of environmental sciences at Stockholm University. Rockström is best known for introducing the widely received concept of “planetary boundaries,” a set of nine limits of allowable change to the Earth system, after which the familiar stable state of the planet becomes uncertain. By now, six of the nine boundaries have been transgressed, an indication of the severe need to establish a governance system that effectively protects the resiliency of the Earth.

Both the “planetary boundaries” and the “planetary commons” are informed by Earth system science, a discipline that regards the planet as a system made up of multiple biophysical subsystems, interacting with one another and together self-regulating the overall stable state of the Earth. These biophysical systems connect the five general “spheres” of the Earth: the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, lithosphere, and cryosphere. There are many biophysical systems, including atmospheric circulation, ice sheet reflectivity, ocean carbon capture, and others (see figure).

Proposed categories of planetary commons shown across five spheres and divided as tipping elements and other subsystems. Source: Figure 2 in Rockström, et al. 2024. “The Planetary Commons: A New Paradigm for Safeguarding Earth-Regulating Systems in the Anthropocene.” PNAS 121 (5)

Rockström and co-authors refer to these biophysical systems as the “planetary commons,” because although some sit squarely within national borders, like the Amazon rainforest, the stability of the entire Earth system relies on their protection. In their article, the authors propose a list of planetary commons, shown as the grey boxes in the figure, and suggest that a central purpose of global governance needs to be their protection.

Presently, the only regions that are globally managed for the sake of collective interest are the global commons, which exist outside of national boundaries and include the high seas, the deep seabed, outer space, Antarctica, and to a lesser extent, the atmosphere. Notably, these commons were not chosen for collective governance in order to protect the Earth system, but instead to regulate equitable access between nations. Furthermore, each global common is governed separately with the assumption of a stable Earth system.

Rockström and co-authors’ article presents the planetary commons as the expansion of the global commons, arguing that the global commons are no longer adequate to address current issues because they omit most biophysical systems that are in our collective interest to protect. Although forming an effective global governance scheme is an immense challenge, the planetary commons should provide a useful framework around which to organize governance that aligns with science, and that is based on a global democratic architecture with a parliamentary body at its center to represent the world’s citizens.

image

https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/31754/experts-urge-governance-of-planetary-commons-to-manage-climate-change/

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/EqBTC0g

March 6, 2024 at 04:18PM

Meet The Express Senior Political Correspondent

By Paul Homewood

image

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1873522/vicky-ford-electric-vehicles-pavement-tax

Yesterday’s article in the Express by Steph Spyro shows how low the British media has fallen.

Spyro now has the title “Environmental Editor” and “Senior Political Correspondent”, so you might assume she has years of experience in these matters.

Sadly not! In fact she has virtually no journalistic experience at all.

image

https://www.express.co.uk/journalist/123331/Steph-Spyro

According to her Linkedin page, she only started work at the Express four years ago, and she only left University in 2020:

 

image

https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephspyro/?originalSubdomain=uk

Her writings make it clear that she knows very little about the topics, and that most of what she thinks she knows is just propaganda that has been fed to her at school and university.

Where have all the real journalists gone?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/zk7UsGm

March 6, 2024 at 04:18PM

Former World Bank economist warns of energy transition’s fiscal risks

By Paul Homewood

 

 

 

London, 5 March – In the run-up to Budget Day (6 March), a new paper by a former World Bank economist and published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation warns that the UK’s current decarbonisation timeframe is unrealistic and threatens to be economically and socially unsustainable.

Professor Gordon Hughes’s paper comes two weeks after the “European Climate Investment Deficit report” warned that EU member states would have to fill an annual investment gap of €406 billion if its 2030 climate goals are to be met.
In his paper, Hughes reveals that a realistic estimate of Britain’s planned energy transition also has an astronomical price tag. Large investments in capital-intensive technologies for producing and consuming non-carbon energy is estimated to be a minimum of 5% of GDP for the next two decades and might easily exceed 7.5% of GDP.
Prof Hughes said:
“There is no chance of borrowing an additional 5% or more of GDP annually for two decades to finance the energy transition. The only viable way of financing the UK’s energy transition is a drastic reduction in consumption to free up resources for the huge level of new capital investment required. Realistically the reduction in private consumption would have to be 8% to 10% for 20 years. Such a shock has never occurred in the last century outside war periods and even then never for more than a decade.”
He added:
“Ignoring the macroeconomic and fiscal constraints will almost certainly lead to yet another long-running policy fiasco like HS2 with results that achieve little in concrete terms. Rather than pretence and muddle, it would be better to extend the period and pace of the energy transition to match the resources that can realistically be afforded.”
Lord Frost welcomed Prof Hughes’s economic realism and said:
“The message in this briefing note could hardly be more urgent. Either we must be honest with the public and be clear that they are going to have to pay at a currently unanticipated level.  Or we must extend the time period for the transition – that is, delay the net zero 2050 target, perhaps out till 2070 or 2075.
Failure to do either – sadly, perhaps the most likely outcome – will mean that we simply muddle on, pretending we are making progress, spending at high levels, but achieving little. Meanwhile the rest of the world outside the West will look on, incredulous at this unprecedented act of economic self harm.”

Gordon Hughes: Financing the energy transition: Do the numbers add up? (pdf)


Contact
Professor Gordon Hughes
gordon.hughes@cantab.net

Tweet
Tweet

Share
Share

Share
Share

Forward
Forward

Copyright © 2024 The Global Warming Policy Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you opted into it with your subscription to The GWPF.
Our mailing address is:
The Global Warming Policy Foundation
55 Tufton Street
London, SW1P 3QL
United Kingdom
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.


  • via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

    https://ift.tt/2iTAd1Q

    March 6, 2024 at 04:18PM