Month: March 2024

Artificial intelligence and weather forecasting…a quiet revolution is taking place in numerical weather prediction

Paul Dorian

Surface forecast map for next Monday, April 1st, made by the 00Z “Artificial intelligence” version of the Euro model; Map courtesy ECMWF, tropicaltidbits.com

Overview

It was just a matter of time…artificial intelligence (AI) has hit the numerical weather prediction world with a strong emphasis on “pattern recognition” and there is no telling where this will lead in the world of weather forecasting. Numerical weather prediction is well suited for AI as – in its current form – it requires a tremendous amount of data crunching and super computing power to resolve the physical laws of fluid dynamics to produce weather conditions in the future. One of the most notable AI advances in recent years has come with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts which is generating experimental AI forecasts that are made available to the public.

Surface forecast map for next Monday, April 1st, made by the 00Z “conventional” version of the Euro model; Map courtesy ECMWF, tropicaltidbits.com

Details

Weather forecasts have improved in accuracy over the years with today’s 6-day forecasts about as good as the 3-day forecast from 30 years ago. This improvement in overall accuracy has come about for numerous reasons one of which has to do with the much better computing power in today’s world compared to three decades ago. Artificial intelligence is now spurring a new revolution in numerical weather prediction that many believe will produce model-based weather forecasts as good or even better than the best traditional models.

The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is known for generating what is considered to be one of the top “traditional” computer forecast models in the world known to most as the “Euro”. In the fall of 2023, this agency began to generate its own experimental AI model-based forecasts known officially as the “ECMWF-AIFS” where AIFS is an acronym for “Artificial Intelligence Forecasting System”. This experimental forecast model, based on ECMWF initial conditions, has been made available in an alpha version to the general public for free and can be found at their own web site here. The resolution of the ECMWF-AIFS model is approximately one degree (111 km) with plans for this to be regularly increased in the future. 

850 mb temperature anomaly forecast map for next Monday, April 1st, made by the 00Z “Artificial intelligence” version of the Euro model; Map courtesy ECMWF, tropicaltidbits.com

Traditional weather models start off by feeding a snapshot of current conditions, based on observations from satellites, weather stations and buoys, into a grid-like computer model that divides the atmosphere into millions of boxes. This snapshot is then run forward in time for each box by applying equations that are based on the physical laws of fluid dynamics and this requires great computational power. Indeed, this kind of data crunching requires supercomputers with 1 million processors and can take several hours to run…usually four times a day.

850 mb temperature anomaly forecast map for next Monday, April 1st, made by the 00Z “Artificial intelligence” version of the Euro model; Map courtesy ECMWF, tropicaltidbits.com

The new AI models play a role in weather prediction by simulating and analyzing past weather events, learning from historical data, and recognizing recurring weather patterns which enhances AI’s ability to predict future weather conditions. In other words, AI skips the expense of solving the equations in favor of “deep learning” after training on 40 years of ECMWF “reanalysis” data (a combination of observations and short-term model forecasts that best represents past weather) (source).

The European Agency is not alone in producing AI forecast models as numerous tech giants are getting involved. In a paper published recently in Science, Google introduced GraphCast and claims it can make weather predictions more accurately (and faster) than the ECMWF High-Resolution Forecast (HRES) on 90% of its verification targets up to 10 days in advance.

The advance in AI forecasting has been rapid during the past few years and one of the important next steps will be to produce ensemble results, which helps to capture uncertainty by running a model multiple times with slightly differing input parameters to create a range of outcomes. While few expect traditional model forecasts to disappear anytime soon, AI will likely approach the point in the near-term where it can be a very useful complement. And when it comes to artificial intelligence, the bottom line is that there is really no telling where this will lead us over the next five or ten years; therefore, as is usually the case when it comes to weather forecasting, stay tuned. 

Meteorologist Paul Dorian
Arcfield
arcfieldweather.com

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/MdPXmKY

March 26, 2024 at 08:08AM

Daily Mail Eulogise About Floating Wind Power–But Forget About The Cost

By Paul Homewood

An incredibly naive article in the Mail:

image

The secret to unlocking Britain’s clean energy future might be found in giant floating wind farms.

These enormous floating structures can reach up to 240 metres (787ft) in height – around the same size as a skyscraper.

And experts predict they could make up 10 per cent of the UK’s wind farms by 2030.

However, building an enormous tower designed to sit in high winds poses some significant engineering issues.

From ‘spars’ that bob like fishing lures to cutting-edge hybrid platforms, engineers have created hundreds of different designs for these clean-energy giants.

Currently, most wind turbines that you see are ‘fixed’ turbines, meaning they have been drilled into the sea floor.

This method is very effective at ensuring the turbine can resist the strong winds it is meant to harness, but isn’t always the best option.

Dr Emma Edwards, an engineer at University of Oxford who develops floating platforms, told MailOnline that fixed turbines can’t be used in the windiest areas.

She explained: ‘The wind is much stronger and more reliable in deep water. 80 per cent of global wind capacity is located in water depths that are too deep for fixed platforms.’

Since it would be too expensive, or simply impossible, to drill into the seabed, the better solution is for turbines to float above it.

The challenge for engineers is to design a floating platform that can keep a 240m-tall tower from swaying too much in extremely strong winds.

While Dr Edwards says there are hundreds of different unique designs, these broadly fit into six different categories.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13235229/floating-windfarms-britain-clean-energy.html

The article goes on to show how the various options might work. But nowhere is there any mention of cost.

The Administrative Strike Price for this year’s CfD auction lists floating wind at 176/MWh, at 2012 prices. At current prices, this works out at £241/MWh, which is more than double ordinary offshore wind, and three times as much as CCGT power:

image

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contracts-for-difference-cfd-allocation-round-6-core-parameters

As we so often see with these sort of stories, the wide eyed reporter is fresh out of Uni. He has only had a full time job since July 2022, and a year writing about nursing apparently qualifies him to be a Science & Technology Reporter:

image

image

https://www.linkedin.com/in/wiliam-hunter-media/?originalSubdomain=uk

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/CIHWPnx

March 26, 2024 at 05:21AM

Dominion Energy’s absurd reply to CFACT’s whale protection lawsuit

NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has authorized Dominion to acoustically harass almost 80,000 marine mammals and these noise harassments are certainly adverse impacts.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/96zNiaR

March 26, 2024 at 04:15AM

Telegraph Compares Solar Capacity with Nuclear!

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/03/23/china-solar-panels-europe-net-zero-energy/

The naive journalist makes several references to the “massive” amounts of solar capacity on offer, for instance:

The clueless reporter evidently does not understand the difference between CAPACITY and GENERATION.

You simply cannot compare solar power, typically producing at about 10 to 15%, with nuclear, which runs at close to 100%

Worse still, that 10% is not available all year round. During December last year, it averaged only 297 MW, which is just 2% of capacity:

https://www.solar.sheffield.ac.uk/pvlive/#

In summer months, solar power can peak at ten times as much, which will clearly destabilise the grid, if capacity is increased as much as the government wants.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/TD5nBZa

March 26, 2024 at 04:00AM