Month: June 2024

Net zero by 2050 is simply not happening

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Philip Bratby

 

 image

Few energy analysts enjoy the level of global respect accorded to Vaclav Smil, a distinguished professor emeritus at the University of Manitoba and a best-selling author of 47 books. Whenever Smil publishes something new, people in the energy space pay attention. That’s certainly the case with his latest publication, a 48-page report titled “Halfway Between Kyoto and 2050: Net Zero Carbon Is a Highly Unlikely Outcome.”

In the report, Smil details efforts to date by global governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and finds them wholly inadequate to achieve the goal of net-zero by 2050.

“To eliminate carbon emissions by 2050,” Smil writes, “governments face unprecedented technical, economic and political challenges, making rapid and inexpensive transition impossible.”

Among a wide array of major hurdles that must be overcome, Smil highlights the enormous scale of global energy use, the slow pace of energy transitions throughout history, and the fact that “major emitters like the United States, China, and Russia have conflicting interests.”

In discussing the slow pace of prior energy transitions, Smil echoes the thoughts of another respected energy analyst and writer, Daniel Yergin, himself a best-selling author of books like “The Prize,” and “The New Map.” During our interview in March, Yergin pointed to the fact that the transition from burning wood for heating and cooking to using coal – that began in 15th century Britain – is still ongoing. Indeed, the world used more wood for energy during 2023 than any other year in history.

Smil shines a spotlight on the key issue of copper, a vital metal used in most every electronic gadget, car, home appliance, and power grids worldwide. His report delves into detail on why it will be impossible to produce copper in the amounts needed to turn  the supposed “transition” into reality, a theme that echoes a growing array of findings by other studies.

Smil estimates that efforts to replace today’s 1.35 billion light duty cars and heavy trucks would “require nearly 150 million tons of additional copper during the next 27 years. That is an equivalent of more than seven years of today’s annual copper extraction for all of the metal’s many industrial and commercial uses.”

He also points out the facts that “metal content of exploited copper ores from Chile, the world’s leading source of the metal, has declined from 1.41 percent in 1999 to 0.6 percent in 2023, and further quality deterioration is inevitable.” The declining metal content means a corresponding massive rise in the tonnage of ore that must be mined and thus a corresponding cost in the disposal of all the additional waste product at a terrible environmental cost.

Worse, copper is just one of an extensive array of critical energy minerals that must also be mined in the coming years to feed the needs of the wind, solar, battery, and electric vehicle industries chosen by globalist governments as the favoured solutions. Metals like lithium, colbalt, tungsten, antimony, nickel, and silver, not to mention an array of rare earths, all must achieve radically higher production levels to make any or all of this transition work.

Smil also highlights the stunning costs of the planned energy transition, pointing out that the US current GDP is about $25 trillion, and getting to net zero will cost 20 per cent of our GDP, meaning the US would have to begin spending about $5 trillion per year on decarbonisation efforts. Citing a McKinsey study that estimates the energy transition’s total cost at $275 trillion, Smil posits that inevitable delays and cost overruns not factored into that estimate are likely to cause the real cost to rise by 60 per cent, bringing the total to an unimaginable $440 trillion.

Smil’s conclusion that a “rapid and inexpensive transition” is “impossible” gives the lie to the preferred narrative pushed by transition proponents that their desired end state can be achieved without major sacrifices and reductions in standards of living. Indeed, we are already starting to see such sacrifices being mandated by governments across the western world.

Prices for every form of energy have risen dramatically since the policy push for Green New Deal-type subsidies started in earnest with Joe Biden’s inauguration in January 2021. The public pronouncements by politicians in the US, Canada, and Europe increasingly include advocacy for rising restrictions in the ability for ordinary citizens to engage in tourist travel, and the need for them to live smaller, less comfortable, less prosperous lives to “save the planet.”

To his great credit, Smil’s report adds to a growing body of data detailing the enormous costs involved in this forced march to lower standards of living for all but the privileged elites among us. It should be required reading in every household and school. 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/08/net-zero-green-energy-transition-vaclav-smil-says-no/

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/Gv0Jfan

June 8, 2024 at 03:56AM

Legal challenge made over ‘net zero’ power plant

By Paul Homewood

 

One more reason why the Net Zero Act must be cancelled.

The UK’s energy security is far too important to be put at the whim of a judge and an eco-nutjob, who is no doubt funded by far left eco groups. (It is an extremely expensive process going to judicial review, if anybody is in any doubt).

 

 

image

The decision to build a new power station faces a legal challenge over its potential greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental consultant Dr Andrew Boswell has applied for a judicial review against the government’s decision to approve a "net zero" gas power station in Teesside.

He said his calculations revealed the plant, which would use carbon capture technology, would produce far more greenhouse gas emissions than initially estimated.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) said it would be "robustly defending" the legal challenge, while the developers said they did not comment on legal proceedings.

The secretary of state for the DESNZ granted a development consent order (DCO), which is required for nationally significant infrastructure projects, to the plant in February.

Developers Net Zero Teesside Power (NZT Power), a joint operation between BP and energy firm Equinor, claimed that at least 90% of the plant’s generated emissions would be captured and funnelled into a storage site beneath the North Sea.

But Dr Boswell said his calculations revealed that the developers failed to consider emissions linked to the supply and and transport of gas, such as the release of methane.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd1ddz14q1no

There is no secret at all about these upstream emissions. And it is also highly unlikely that the plant will achieve anywhere near 90% capture.

What we also know is that CCS plants are extremely energy inefficient, ie they need much more gas to produce 1 unit of electricity than a plant without CCS. Hence these upstream emissions will be much greater too.

It would therefore make much more sense all round to just build a proper CCGT plant with no carbon capture.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/DP8M2AF

June 8, 2024 at 03:37AM

Boondoggle: Carbon capture projects are worse than a public nuisance

One of the worst climate mistakes is megaprojects aimed at sucking carbon dioxide (CO2) out of the air and burying it deep underground.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/VyXpsTM

June 8, 2024 at 03:33AM

Renewable Storage Claims Incinerated: Lithium Batteries Burn For Days

When self-immolating lithium-ion batteries start spewing toxic smoke, the action last for days because firefighters won’t go near them. They simply let them burn themselves out, and if that takes a week, so be it.

And it’s not just those in service providing deadly pyrotechnic displays (see above the giant Tesla that burned for days in Victoria). Those past their use by dates are also giving thrilling thermal displays, as they turn their bevy of heavy metals and rare earths into impossible-to-control fires (they can’t be extinguished) and threaten the lives of neighbours for miles around – as occurred recently in France.

In the piece below, we quite like the understated explanation for all the ‘renewable’ energy storage excitement:

The chain reaction can happen when a lithium-ion battery creates heat faster than it can dissipate. That rapid increase of temperature can then turn to fire.

There’s another name for energy storage devices that release the energy they store with ferocious rapidity: ‘bombs’.

Otay Mesa battery facility fire could take weeks to put out entirely
Fox 5 San Diego and KUSI News
Kasia Gregorczyk
23 May 2024

A stubborn fire at a battery storage site in Otay Mesa is burning for a sixth day. Fire officials are preparing for it to potentially take weeks to put out.

“We’re not sure. We’re preparing for the worst and making plans to be here for a long time, two to four weeks and will reevaluate then,” said Captain Brent Pascua with Cal Fire San Diego.

The fire began last Wednesday at the Gateway Energy Storage facility and flare-ups over the weekend put evacuations warnings for the surrounding area back in place.

Cal Fire issues update on Otay Mesa battery storage site fire
Pascua said things began to reignite Friday night.

“You have to put water on it to keep the fire confined, but that water damages the batteries also allowing them to arc starting another fire. We’re just trying to keep the public safe and keep the fire contained to the building,” he said.

The chain reaction can happen when a lithium-ion battery creates heat faster than it can dissipate. That rapid increase of temperature can then turn to fire.
Fox 5 San Diego and KUSI News

via STOP THESE THINGS

https://ift.tt/ryGQCnw

June 8, 2024 at 02:30AM