Month: August 2024

Guice to California Dept. of Conservation: End Virtue Signaling, Liberate Oil and Gas

Ed. Note: William R. Guice speaks energy truth to California. MasterResource is pleased to reproduce his August 6th letter to the California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division, Central District. The letter first appeared at LinkedIn.

“California suffers from revenue losses for many critical services, has a massive budget deficit, is increasing its dependence on foreign oil, and has the 3rd highest energy prices in the US.  These results are shameful.”

At LinkedIn, Rod Guice shared a letter he wrote “to protest what I believe is blatant state sponsored virtue-signaling.” He explained:

I’m weary of the ridiculous anti-Oil & Gas bias I see everywhere here and am sick of the unnecessary over-regulation of California’s honorable Oil & Gas Industry. The state clearly intends to destroy the Industry, as well as the jobs and livelihoods of Californians who depend on it. We’re already seeing the shameful results of this as California suffers from revenue losses for many critical services, has a massive budget deficit, is increasing its dependence on foreign oil, and has the 3rd highest energy prices in the US.

Since when can an American government attack a whole American industry, wipe out jobs, and hurt the lives of its citizens and communities? State government under Newsom has brought us to this. How long will we tolerate it? It’s up to us to change the course of California, but we have to stand together to do it. Let’s vote like we mean it! I hope you will take a few minutes to read the letter.

The letter follows:

This past Thursday (8/1/24) I was running some errands in the California/Mohawk area in Bakersfield, and noticed CalGEM’s P&A operation in the parking lot of the Stockdale Tower Building.  I thought to myself, “They’re Plugging & Abandoning the old well in the parking lot that’s been there forever,” and swung by for a closer look.  I then saw the signs that the State had hung on fences around the work site.

I was shocked by the message on the signs; please be advised that the message is insulting (I’m not the only one who thinks so) and with respect to the good people working at CalGEM, I’m demanding that these signs be removed from further public display.  There are at least five reasons for this:

First, the message “No drilling here” is not only applicable merely to the work site, it’s analogous to the broader condition of California’s Oil & Gas Industry, which has been severely damaged by ever-increasing regulation and anti-oil bias.

Second, the message is boastful and disrespectful to those here who are still employed in the Oil Industry, as well as those who aren’t; CalGEM should have more respect for people who have lost their jobs in an industry that’s shrinking due to over-regulation and anti-oil bias.

Third, the message “No drilling here” should be a humiliation for every Californian: Most other States with Oil & Gas Reserves are drilling and frac’g, and US Production is at an all-time high. Since 2015 however, California’s oil production has declined 41%, and Oil & Gas jobs are declining with it. This is not something to be proud of.

Fourth, due in part to the production decline, California suffers from revenue losses for many critical services, has a massive budget deficit, is increasing its dependence on foreign oil, and has the 3rd highest energy prices in the US.  These results are shameful.

Fifth, I’m also troubled by last part of the message, “The work at this site is to seal old hazardous oil wells, part of a statewide project to protect public health, safety, and the environment.” I have no issues with plugging orphan wells, especially like this one (in parking lots, with zero likelihood that any Operator would ever try to return it to production) and I oppose any Operator who would just walk away from a well and leave it orphan. However, I know that this particular well, K.C.L. #A74 (0402908240) was drilled in 1951.

It’s been sitting there for 73 years. So, what is it about the well that makes it hazardous now?  Why is it only now, a threat to “public health, safety, and environment?” If the well is so hazardous, why wasn’t it plugged 40-years ago?  I suspect the real answer is something like this: It wasn’t on anyone’s radar. No one cared. No one noticed. It wasn’t hazardous. Correct me, if I’m wrong! The message reminds me of signs at Caltrans construction sites that say, “Your Tax Dollars at Work”.  Only it’s not tax dollars. Its dollars from per-barrel fees paid by Oil & Gas Operators that fund CalGEM; and CalGEM is using the funds to aid and abet those who are destroying our honorable Industry. The sign is merely state sponsored virtue-signaling. 

The next time I see signs like this one, I’ll consider doing some of my own virtue-signaling and may place signs like those below, adjacent to the State’s signs in protest.  The only appropriate signs for these kinds of operations are, “No Admittance – Authorized Personnel Only.”

I feel for people who work at CalGEM, many of whom I know personally. I know it must be hard to have backgrounds in Oil & Gas and put on positive faces from day-to-day, all while working for the current State government; it must seem hypocritical and it cannot be easy.  But try walking in someone else’s shoes.  Imagine you’re an ethical employee, working for an honorable company, as part of an industry that has helped provide the fuel and energy that lifted the developed world to its current high quality of life. And knowing that reliable energy from Fossil Fuel has greatly benefitted 100% of everyone who’s ever been around it, then imagine that you’ve seen your work and industry defamed and blamed for the ills of the world, accused of greed, and of profiting by selling humanity down the river; and you watch as a government destroys your industry and your job. This is what it’s like working here in Oil & Gas now.

Is this even America anymore? Since when can an American government attack a whole American industry, wipe out jobs, and hurt the lives of its citizens and communities? Please bear in mind that it’s not just our livelihoods that are on the State chopping block. When the Oil & Gas industry is dead here, and there’s nothing to regulate, your livelihoods will be next.  I wish for you and yours, only the best!

Sincerely and Respectfully,                                                  – William R. Guice, Veer Energy, Inc

The post Guice to California Dept. of Conservation: End Virtue Signaling, Liberate Oil and Gas appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

https://ift.tt/loy1EC4

August 23, 2024 at 01:04AM

‘Third Rail’: Here’s Why Team Kamala Isn’t Peddling the Typical Dem Climate Panic This Election

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Nick Pope
Contributor

Vice President Kamala Harris has been tight-lipped about her record on climate change while major green groups continue to support her anyways — a dynamic that political pundits and energy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation is no accident.

Harris — who called climate change an “existential threat” in 2019 —  previously probed major oil corporations as California’s attorney general and co-sponsored the Green New Deal as a senator, but she has mostly avoided climate change and green energy on the campaign trail, framing the issues in terms of economics, jobs and investment when she does bring up the subject. That many major eco-activist groups are still supporting her indicates that Harris is trying to broaden her appeal to more moderate voters in order to win the election and subsequently govern as a climate hardliner once in office, energy experts and political strategists told the DCNF.

“The Democrats have figured out that the apocalyptic vibe isn’t really likely to bring people along for this particular ride,” Mike McKenna, a GOP strategist with extensive energy sector experience, told the DCNF. “So, they have obviously made a command decision to focus only on the carrots and ignore anything that looks like a stick.” (RELATED: Harris Campaign Says Kamala Has Changed, But Will She Bring California’s Climate Agenda To The White House?)

Harris and her running mate, Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, have campaigned on climate issues in passing, but eco-activist leaders are generally unconcerned about the lack of focus on the issue, according to The New York Times. Walz did not address climate change during his Wednesday night speech at the Democratic National Convention , sticking primarily to his background as a rural American.

Even after the Harris campaign walked back her previous support for a fracking ban, a slew of environmental organizations opposed to fracking endorsed her candidacy. The campaign’s apparent strategy of not focusing much on climate change “suggests that Democrats see talking about the environment as a lose-lose proposition” in this election cycle, The Washington Post reported on Thursday.

“They know what she’s going to do. There’s no upside to talking about climate,” Steve Milloy, a senior legal fellow at the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute, told the DCNF. “Keep in mind, I believe it was in July of 2022, The New York Times ran a poll reporting that only 1% of voters prioritize climate. So it’s a loser issue … And they can’t afford to lose Pennsylvania. So, they don’t want to talk about climate, because when you talk about climate, then you have to talk about fracking, and then they’re going to have to talk about how she wants to stop fracking, regardless of what she says.”

Democratic Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, who has pursued one of the most aggressive state-level climate agendas in the U.S. in his tenure as governor, recently told the NYT that he doesn’t think Harris needs to leverage her climate record on the campaign trail.

“I am not concerned,” Inslee told the NYT. “I am totally confident that when she is in a position to effect positive change, she will.”

Moreover, the political wings of three green groups — the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund — are spending $55 million on swing state advertisements to boost Harris, but the first three ads released do not actually address climate change. The ads back into the subject of green energy and pitch Harris’ record on the issue as centered on protecting ordinary Americans from greedy corporations and promoting “advanced manufacturing and clean energy” as a means of helping the middle class.

This approach is different than the one Harris used during her first run for the presidency in the 2020 cycle, in which Harris attempted to outflank many of her Democratic opponents from the left by endorsing policies like carbon taxes, changes to dietary guidelines to decrease red meat consumption and a ban on plastic straws to complement a fracking ban.

Eco-activists and climate-focused voters “definitely believe she will go left, left, left on climate and energy,” Scott Jennings, a political strategist and on-air pundit for CNN, told the DCNF. “Of course they do. Her 2020 campaign agenda is what they are banking on. And I assume she will deliver for them if she wins.” (RELATED: ‘Border Czar’ Kamala Harris Once Blamed ‘Lack Of Climate Adaptation’ For Massive Immigration Surge)

President Joe Biden also made climate a key aspect of his successful 2020 campaign, guaranteeing that he would end fossil fuels and calling former President Donald Trump a “climate arsonist” who was failing to protect Americans from the “ravages of climate change,” according to Inside Climate News. Nevertheless, Biden and his top officials still frequently drew the ire of hardline climate activists despite the administration pursuing what it describes as the “most ambitious climate agenda in history.”

Harris cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate to secure the 2022 passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Biden’s signature climate bill. While its price tag has ballooned from initial estimates and some contend that the bill has actually worsened inflation, the IRA unleashed hundreds of billions of dollars of private and public spending on green energy and manufacturing projects.

The Biden-Harris administration touts that investment as evidence that its domestic agenda is working.

“The climate activists in the Democrat Party have finally realized that no one is buying their ‘climate emergency’ claptrap anymore or their claims of 5, 10, or 20 years left to ‘save the planet.’ Instead, they are pedaling a barrage of silly economic claims that somehow pouring hundreds of billions and now trillions of dollars into government centrally planned projects,” Marc Morano, the publisher of Climate Depot, told the DCNF. “This new Democrat climate messaging, where they don’t mention climate, is part of the legacy of the Inflation Reduction Act, where local communities and certain states get unlimited federal funds poured into them via taxpayers to create a ‘green economy.’” (RELATED: Renowned Pollster Says Donald Trump Can End Kamala’s Campaign With One ‘Ten-Word Question’)

Len Foxwell, a Democratic strategist based in Maryland, said that the Harris campaign’s lack of attention to climate change and green energy issues is deliberate given her need to secure the support of a broad coalition if she is to win in November.

“First and foremost, Kamala Harris’ responsibility in this race is to win it. And to do so, she has to present her priorities in a way that resonates with those who are concerned about the economy and frustrated with their own financial situations. Specifically, she has to emphasize the opportunities that exist for better jobs, higher wages and long-term cost savings for the ratepayers,” Foxwell told the DCNF. “This is particularly imperative when discussing renewable energy investment, because the upfront costs tend to be considerable and the financial benefits to the middle class are largely speculative.”

As the Democratic candidate for the presidency, Harris “has to communicate her vision and values in a way that attracts the broadest possible coalition,” though it remains to be seen how she would actually govern if elected given uncertainty about the future balance of power in Congress, according to Foxwell. Harris and her team must take care to not propose policies that would increase the cost of living for middle class Americans, which would be “third rail” politics given how concerned people are about the economy, he added.

The Harris campaign did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/yFCUBcw

August 23, 2024 at 12:02AM

Leftist judges shouldn’t touch climate policy

Like government agencies, courts have no authority to decide such major, complex cases

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/HrgYyPX

August 22, 2024 at 11:03PM

Faking US Temperature Data

Fabricated US temperature data from NOAA appears to have a change in their algorithm after the 1998 El Nino. The fake temperatures were shifted upwards by about three degrees. The 1998 shift is how NOAA creates the fake warming in … Continue reading

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/jtPsXMm

August 22, 2024 at 10:13PM