Author: Iowa Climate Science Education

Texas Flood Hysteria: Media’s Climate Blame Drowned by History and Data

In the aftermath of the tragic Texas Hill Country flooding, a barrage of mainstream media outlets, including; CBS Texas “History warned of the Central Texas flood: Why the danger on the Guadalupe River wasn’t a surprise,” CNN “How climate change made Texas flooding more violent,” and San Antonio Current “Bill Nye the Science Guy calls for fossil fuel ban as death toll from Texas flood continues to rise,” have advanced the narrative that climate change is turning extreme weather and deadly floods into a “new normal.” These claims are wrong, misleading, and, frankly, do a disservice to public understanding of Texas flood risk. The historical and scientific record shows no significant trend toward more frequent or severe heat waves or floods in this region. The evidence instead points to a simple, unchanging fact: Floods have happened here for millennia, long before SUVs and coal fired power plants, and will continue as long as the Guadalupe River flows.

Perhaps the most absurd quote comes from the San Antonio Current, in which Bill Nye declares:

Other than installing early flood warning systems in flood-prone areas, Nye said the only way prevent similar tragedies in the future is for Congress to enact a total fossil fuel ban to curb the effects of climate change. He added that humans’ alterations to the climate have been scientifically proven to exacerbate flooding events.

Calling for the elimination of fossil fuels as the only solution to flooding on a river that’s been flooding since before the invention of the steamboat is not a scientific argument, but a political one.

Let’s be clear: flooding along the Guadalupe River is neither new nor “caused” by today’s climate. The very first line in the CBS Texas report actually gets it right: “Texas hydrologists working with the National Weather Service say they recognized the conditions last Thursday that could lead to catastrophic flooding on the Guadalupe River. And they say, based on past events, this kind of outcome was a known risk.”

The area’s own official safety guide states:

If you live in the Guadalupe River Basin, you also live in one of the three most dangerous regions in the U.S.A. for flash floods! Local residents and weather experts refer to the Texas Hill Country as ‘Flash Flood Alley,’ because heavy rainfall and runoff from creeks and streams can cause rapid rises and flooding in a matter of hours… The Guadalupe River experienced major floods in 1936, 1952, 1972, 1973, 1978, 1987, 1991 and 1997. Last year’s flood of October 1998 developed in a matter of hours, broke most existing records, exceeded the 100-year flood plain, and inundated areas that had never been flooded before. But floods are not predictable. They do not follow measured cycles.

The fact that the area has been previously named as “Flash Flood Alley,” complete with it’s own Wikipedia page, which states: “Flash Flood Alley is an area of Central Texas that is considered the most flash-flood prone region in the United States,” should negate any climate change claims about the most recent flood all by itself.

This is not a fossil-fuel problem, it’s a geography problem. Texas Hill Country’s steep terrain, rocky ground, and narrow riverbeds react rapidly to intense rain, making the region prone to sudden, severe flooding. The river has repeatedly exceeded historic flood levels even when atmospheric CO2 was much lower than it is today.

Let’s review the record—because, unlike much of the modern media, data matters more than opinion:

  • Major floods in the Guadalupe River Basin occurred all throughout the 20th century, well before the current era of supposed “climate crisis.”
  • The catastrophic October 1998 flood developed in just a few hours, broke most existing records, and exceeded the so-called 100-year flood plain, flooding areas “that had never been flooded before.” The official flood guide bluntly states, “Unfortunately, an even greater flood will occur sometime in the future.”
  • These events took place when global temperatures and atmospheric CO2 were lower than they are today.

The CBS Texas article actually provides a rare moment of candor:

The I-Team reviewed National Weather Service and historical crest records and found that the Guadalupe River has experienced major flooding more than a dozen times in the last century… The river in that area has been even higher four other times since tracking began, and it’s reached more than 25 feet on 15 other occasions.

Camp Mystic where many people died, and other riverside camp properties are built on a flood plain. As tragic as the deaths are, the decision to continue rebuilding and vacationing in a known, historic flood zone guarantees that people will remain at risk. Blaming “climate change” for fatalities while ignoring this fundamental fact is both irresponsible and misleading.

The CBS article quotes an unnamed Texas Severe Storms Association spokesperson who said:

“Campsites and homes in high-risk areas like the Hill Country should be relocated to higher ground and properties within the flood zone should be utilized only for day use.”

In other words, the tragedy is not about fossil fuels, it’s about ignoring land use history and basic floodplain management.

Another misleading narrative being pushed by media and pundits is the idea that deaths resulted from budget cuts at NOAA or the National Weather Service. Jason Johnson, a lead hydrologist at the NOAA West Gulf River Forecast Center in Fort Worth was also quoted in the CBS article, saying, “Despite the tragedy, Johnson said his team was staffed and ready. Forecasting models were in place. More scientists were on standby. ‘We had our best people on shift… everyone was utilized,’ he said.”

Clearly, no budget cuts affected staffing during this event.

Documents show the National Weather Service issued a Flash Flood Watch up to 10 hours before water swept through the campsites, followed by a Flash Flood Warning 3 hours ahead, giving ample time for action.

By 5:34 AM, the warning turned into a Flash Flood EMERGENCY: “A LARGE AND DEADLY FLOOD WAVE IS MOVING DOWN THE GUADALUPE.” “SEEK HIGHER GROUND NOW.” shown in NWS bulletins. Campers and families were directly named in the alert:

Timely and direct warnings were issued, and it is a tragedy that people along the river either didn’t receive them, or if they did, ignored them.

The official “Staying Safe” flood guide for the Guadalupe River underscores the importance of personal responsibility:

Despite these staggering losses, more damage was prevented and lives were saved because the initial flooding occurred during daylight hours and because people listened to warnings from their local emergency management and law enforcement officials… It should also convince you that the Guadalupe Basin rivers will flood again.

Contrary to the dire claims of Bill Nye and the CNN report, data from climate agencies and historical records show no increasing trend in heat waves or flooding for Texas or the United States as a whole. NOAA’s own records indicate that the frequency of major floods nationwide peaked in the early 20th century and has not increased in recent decades. If climate change had any role in causing or exacerbating the rainfall, it should be apparent in the rainfall and flooding history of the area. Below is a chart of Texas flash floods from 1996 to 2024 that show a DECLINE in these extreme weather events.

Recent peer-reviewed studies have found no increase in the global frequency or intensity of floods, despite higher CO2 levels. The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports it has “low confidence” climate change is impacting flooding and hedges its bets, noting low confidence in any detectable link between flooding trends and manmade climate change. For further reading, see comprehensive analysis at Climate At A Glance: Floods.

The real danger is that media and activist “science communicators” use every tragedy to promote costly, irrelevant policy agendas like Bill Nye’s call for a total fossil fuel ban, which would devastate the Texas economy, cripple energy reliability, and do nothing to prevent flash floods in the Hill Country. The history of the region is written in water, not carbon dioxide.

Facts say this was a natural event that has happened before and the facts remain unchanged; floods have always been part of life in Texas Hill Country and always will be. The real solution is to heed warnings, avoid rebuilding in known flood zones, and resist the urge to politicize every natural disaster as proof of “climate crisis.” If history tells us anything, it’s that ignoring the lessons of the past is a far greater danger than any supposed climate tipping point. It is shameful that Bill Nye and CNN promoted baseless and false rhetoric to gain political points.

Anthony Watts

Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.

Originally posted at ClimateRealism


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/VDZAEl1

July 20, 2025 at 04:01PM

Open Thread

A place for discussion

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/ULZk0W1

July 20, 2025 at 12:04PM

Are There Two Sides to Ecocide?

Or do renewable energy companies get a free pass?

via Climate Scepticism

https://ift.tt/gkz60sq

July 20, 2025 at 08:52AM

Swyddffynnon DCNN 8073 & 8063 – Confusion reigns.

52.27191 -3.91597 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 4 Installed 1/1/1955

Swyddffynnon weather station was originally installed in 1955. Temperature records have only been digitally archived from 1959 though manuscript copies for the first four years are available to view online. The site, however, is riddled with confusions that are not immediately obvious so here are my attempts at clarification.

To begin with I am baffled by the Met Office’s very low estimation of the site which warrants in depth investigation. Swyddffynnon has been “officially” assessed as the lowest regulated standard of Class 4 (Class 5 has no requirements to meet) and its consequent inaccuracy of +/-2°C. Looking at the 30 metre radius circled area below for Class 2 requirement the entire area is free from everything apart from pastureland and sheep.

Looking at Google Earth Pro historical imagery there are 8 aerial views going back to 1985 and they all look exactly the same in terms of site conditions with no changes whatsoever. This is actually not surprising given that the site owner of Cruglas Farm (incidentally the original name for this weather station) is well known in the Welsh Farming community for his efforts. Google AI has a “short” stating

Cruglas Farm is owned by Terry Mills. He is also the owner of a beef and sheep farm and has been working to create a haven for wildlife on the farm for 30 years.”

He has also won awards for his countryside stewardship so this site is in very safe hands.

Moving on to the all important topography, again it is difficult to see any problems. The screen is at 171 metres amsl. A broad angle Ordnance Survey sheet of the area reveals nothing other than very gently undulating countryside with the screen neither in a frost hollow nor unduly high. The screen is 12 miles inland from the mid west Wales coast and 13 miles south west of Aberystwyth. The much higher ground of Mid Wales lies to the east of the screen so any winds passing over them would already be relatively dry easterlies. In the lee of these drier easterlies it is unlikely to create significant Foehn winds.

With absence of any artificial warming effects within 30 metres, consistent ground cover and benign topography typical of the wider area, I can see no reason for this site not to be Class 2 and fully accurate. Perhaps the Met Office knows something that I do not but I find it incredibly hard to believe this site is worse than Class 3 assessed Heathrow. Again I am finding sites that are rural and likely very reliable being marked down by the Met Office whilst all manner of corrupted urban or aviation sites are considered acceptable. Perhaps if Terry Mills surrounded it with Solar Panels it would improve its ratings! Clearly something is not right here.

Under its current custodianship the site has a very good observations record but its history prior to Terry Mills is a bit patchy. The original 1955 site was actually elsewhere but with no renaming of the site (just that covert renumbering hence two different District County Network Numbers I noted in the headline) it was not apparent where it was. The brief “Remarks” comment below identifies it.

The original site closed down in 1974 and was by the farm buildings below. These buildings post date the relocation so were probably the cause of the move.

Curiously there was then a big gap in the readings with none at all recorded for over 7 years until late 1981

The site then ran with fully reliable manual readings until automation took over but with a surprisingly long period of no readings from mid 2010 to late 2011 through the changeover. The site has run reliably ever since.

In conclusion, despite that frustrating transitional loss of readings in 2010/11 this site has been, in my opinion, very good for 44 years since relocation and was probably a good original location. This missing data unfortunately renders the site very difficult for long term historical climate reconstruction though could be a good comparator for more recent times. For the Met Office to regularly downrate such sites (South Newington for example) is very strange from the CIMO and meteorological viewpoints so perhaps there are, yet again, other motivations.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/Aw73tf4

July 20, 2025 at 08:02AM