Category: Daily News

NASA Is Testing AI Enabled ‘Dynamic Targeting’ from Space

From the “sounds like a weapons system” department and NASA JPL:

Called Dynamic Targeting, the concept has been in development for more than a decade at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California. The first of a series of flight tests occurred aboard a commercial satellite in mid-July. The goal: to show the potential of Dynamic Targeting to enable orbiters to improve ground imaging by avoiding clouds and also to autonomously hunt for specific, short-lived phenomena like wildfires, volcanic eruptions, and rare storms.

In a recent test, NASA showed how artificial intelligence-based technology could help orbiting spacecraft provide more targeted and valuable science data. The technology enabled an Earth-observing satellite for the first time to look ahead along its orbital path, rapidly process and analyze imagery with onboard AI, and determine where to point an instrument. The whole process took less than 90 seconds, without any human involvement.

This graphic shows how JPL’s Dynamic Targeting uses a lookahead sensor

This graphic shows how JPL’s Dynamic Targeting uses a lookahead sensor to see what’s on a satellite’s upcoming path. Onboard algorithms process the sensor’s data, identifying clouds to avoid and targets of interest for closer observation as the satellite passes overhead.

NASA/JPL-Caltech

“The idea is to make the spacecraft act more like a human: Instead of just seeing data, it’s thinking about what the data shows and how to respond,” says Steve Chien, a technical fellow in AI at JPL and principal investigator for the Dynamic Targeting project. “When a human sees a picture of trees burning, they understand it may indicate a forest fire, not just a collection of red and orange pixels. We’re trying to make the spacecraft have the ability to say, ‘That’s a fire,’ and then focus its sensors on the fire.”

This first flight test for Dynamic Targeting wasn’t hunting specific phenomena like fires — that will come later. Instead, the point was avoiding an omnipresent phenomenon: clouds.

Most science instruments on orbiting spacecraft look down at whatever is beneath them. However, for Earth-observing satellites with optical sensors, clouds can get in the way as much as two-thirds of the time, blocking views of the surface. To overcome this, Dynamic Targeting looks 300 miles (500 kilometers) ahead and has the ability to distinguish between clouds and clear sky. If the scene is clear, the spacecraft images the surface when passing overhead. If it’s cloudy, the spacecraft cancels the imaging activity to save data storage for another target.

“If you can be smart about what you’re taking pictures of, then you only image the ground and skip the clouds. That way, you’re not storing, processing, and downloading all this imagery researchers really can’t use,” said Ben Smith of JPL, an associate with NASA’s Earth Science Technology Office, which funds the Dynamic Targeting work. “This technology will help scientists get a much higher proportion of usable data.”

The testing is taking place on CogniSAT-6, a briefcase-size CubeSat that launched in March 2024. The satellite — designed, built, and operated by Open Cosmos — hosts a payload designed and developed by Ubotica featuring a commercially available AI processor. While working with Ubotica in 2022, Chien’s team conducted tests aboard the International Space Station running algorithms similar to those in Dynamic Targeting on the same type of processor. The results showed the combination could work for space-based remote sensing.

Since CogniSAT-6 lacks an imager dedicated to looking ahead, the spacecraft tilts forward 40 to 50 degrees to point its optical sensor, a camera that sees both visible and near-infrared light. Once look-ahead imagery has been acquired, Dynamic Targeting’s advanced algorithm, trained to identify clouds, analyzes it. Based on that analysis, the Dynamic Targeting planning software determines where to point the sensor for cloud-free views. Meanwhile, the satellite tilts back toward nadir (looking directly below the spacecraft) and snaps the planned imagery, capturing only the ground.

This all takes place in 60 to 90 seconds, depending on the original look-ahead angle, as the spacecraft speeds in low Earth orbit at nearly 17,000 mph (7.5 kilometers per second).

With the cloud-avoidance capability now proven, the next test will be hunting for storms and severe weather — essentially targeting clouds instead of avoiding them. Another test will be to search for thermal anomalies like wildfires and volcanic eruptions. The JPL team developed unique algorithms for each application.

“This initial deployment of Dynamic Targeting is a hugely important step,” Chien said. “The end goal is operational use on a science mission, making for a very agile instrument taking novel measurements.”

There are multiple visions for how that could happen — possibly even on spacecraft exploring the solar system. In fact, Chien and his JPL colleagues drew some inspiration for their Dynamic Targeting work from another project they had also worked on: using data from ESA’s (the European Space Agency’s) Rosetta orbiter to demonstrate the feasibility of autonomously detecting and imaging plumes emitted by comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

On Earth, adapting Dynamic Targeting for use with radar could allow scientists to study dangerous extreme winter weather events called deep convective ice storms, which are too rare and short-lived to closely observe with existing technologies. Specialized algorithms would identify these dense storm formations with a satellite’s look-ahead instrument. Then a powerful, focused radar would pivot to keep the ice clouds in view, “staring” at them as the spacecraft speeds by overhead and gathers a bounty of data over six to eight minutes.

Some ideas involve using Dynamic Targeting on multiple spacecraft: The results of onboard image analysis from a leading satellite could be rapidly communicated to a trailing satellite, which could be tasked with targeting specific phenomena. The data could even be fed to a constellation of dozens of orbiting spacecraft. Chien is leading a test of that concept, called Federated Autonomous MEasurement, beginning later this year.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/Vz5n6XS

August 26, 2025 at 04:03PM

Magilligan No 2 WMO 03907 – Why the Met Office has become unfit for purpose, record chasing is now their prime motivation.

The above image is from a post on the Met Office’s X (formerly Twitter) account and is a classic example of both their absurd levels of gaslighting the public and their rather patronising ignorance. Before detailing the absurdity of their claims I shall quickly address the latter point they raised

Although not a bank holiday in Scotland,”

Do no Scots work for the Met Office? Unlikely as they have a regional office at Dyce. Yesterday most certainly WAS a Bank holiday in Scotland and very few banks (if any) were open. 25th August though was not a PUBLIC Holiday, a significant difference.

55.16043 -6.94914 Met Office (wrongly) CIMO Assessed Class 2 Installed 4/8/2011

In modern day typical record chasing style the Met Office desperately sought on 25th August 2025 to find “records” to break to keep up their absurd mantra of ever spiralling upward temperatures. Having already in 2025 sought out any records they could find to break in May and June by chasing “moveable feasts” such as the comical “first day of Wimbledon” , their latest attempt fell to the early “late summer”/August Public Holiday Monday.

A quick bit of history. The August Bank Holiday Monday was introduced throughout the UK and Ireland in 1871 as the first Monday in August. In 1964 this was altered in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to the Monday after the last Saturday in August but Scotland retained the original tradition based largely on its cooler climate and earlier Autumn onset. This last August Saturday condition actually meant the Bank Holiday Monday could fall in September which it did on both 2/9/1968 and 1/9/1969. In 1971 this anomaly was corrected to make it the last Monday in August with Scotland following this for the banking sector but not the Public Holiday.

I mention all this trivia to demonstrate that the “August Bank Holiday” has a history of possible dates varying from the 1st to 7th August and the 25th August to the 2nd September i.e potentially 16 possible days in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, but only 7 in Scotland. However, the actual numerical day number from the start of the calendar year can also vary dependent on whether it is a leap year or not, so possibly 18 different day points!

All of this is completely irrelevant to meteorology and especially the average of weather measured over a 30 year period i.e. climate but seems to endlessly preoccupy the Met Office – do their publicists have nothing better to do? Are they even required on the public payroll to produce such floccinaucinihilipilification?

Magilligan weather station recorded just 24.5°C (a modern day warm orange weather map colour in lieu of the traditional cool green) on a 25th August. A measure of how unremarkable that is was the 24.1°C recorded at Strabane 46 days further on in the year on 10th October 1969. I have friends who set their central heating thermostats to 25°C and the Centerparcs holiday villages group boasts its main domes are nearly 30°C all year round. And yet somehow the Met office conjures up such numbers to suggest shock horror – but what demonstrates just how unfit for purpose they really are is found when you study their Magilligan weather station in detail.

Firstly the Met Office claims this is a Class 2 site – IT IS NOT. Since when did the CIMO regulations allow for 115 square metres of black silage bales to be stacked within the 30 metre exclusion zone.

Those bales are typically between 1.2m and 2.4m in diameter and stacked up to 3 high, likely up to 500 cubic metres of sileage heating to waft over the screen in any gentle south easterly breeze. In addition they will also represent a major windbreak effect.

Is this silage dump a feature of the Magilligan site? Very much so and to such an extent that nearly every Google Earth historical image includes them notably at their peak in late July/early August. Consider this view below ( n.b. this is from 9/2020, the headline image is from 2024)

And then consider this image from 4/2021

And this from 4/2025

The story here is very simple in agricultural terms. Fields around are cropped in the latter summer, processed and stored on this site (around now) as animal fodder through the winter. In addition to the silage’s stored effects it also gets to and from the store by very large motorised vehicles and motorised handling equipment passing within just a few metres of the screen on a very regular and long term basis…….and if the Met office inspectors viewing this site cannot see that then they shouldn’t be driving there.

The Magilligan site is rendered totally unacceptable by the nature of all the distorting extraneous heat sources and transient effects. It is worth remembering the process of meteorological recording and averaging is predicated on registering the extreme points as the primary data drivers and all the distortions that results in as I detailed in this post. Add to this that PRTs will record any short term temperature pulse from a vehicle exhaust and the deficiencies of Stevenson Screens (Aitken Effect) will over/under record (especially night-time minima) due to wind shelter and Magilligan is a de facto worthless site. The Met Office should be ashamed of its own poor site husbandry of one only opened in 2011.

Going back to the headline bogus “Bank Holiday” record proclamations by the Met Office it is worth recalling the other sites mentioned. Hawarden is of course Chester Airport and is a classic example of a relocation from a poor site to a significantly worse one simply to chase records and break an already dubious record from a nearby even worse site at Hawarden Bridge.

Ross-on-Wye recorded the England high from its very pretty but wholly inappropriate sun trap more likely designed for sun bathing than accurate temperature recording.

But the award for most dubious ever record (and one which the Met Office REFUSED to account for under Freedom of Information request) must go to Charterhall in Scotland. This is the site that failed to record any readings at all for 18 consecutive days and then suddenly, on coming back online, managed to instantly record the Scottish all time national “high” of 34.8°C

And this is the “accepted” Scottish national record high despite the Met Office passing 35.1°C into the archives for Floor Castle on the same day and again refusing to answer under FOI to justify how this could possibly happen….And it is still there on file to this day.

In summary Magilligan is demonstrably yet another unacceptable junk site despite what the Met Office falsely assesses it as. Records for variable dates/moveable feasts are pathetic faux showbiz gimmicks unworthy of any institution claiming scientific integrity. This is par for the course for the Met Office and all its recent Shlock Horror headlines. The Met Office is past its use by date – time for a change.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/SwY4x1q

August 26, 2025 at 03:25PM

Hottest Summer? Met Office Take The Piss!

By Paul Homewood

 

 

image

The United Kingdom has "almost certainly" had its hottest summer on record, according to provisional statistics from the Met Office.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c1kz18d3wjro

 

It has become apparent for a couple of weeks now that the Met Office were determined to claim this summer as the hottest evah.

The claim is transparently absurd, as anybody who lived through the summer of 1976 will attest. Unlike the Met Office and BBC, I will wait until all the data is in to pass judgement.

But this latest edict from the Met Office just how far their UK temperature datasets have become divorced from reality. They pretend to know the average UK temperature to a few hundredths of a degree. Yet the dataset is almost entirely based on worthless junk sites, so badly sited that they might be overestimating temperatures by as much as five degrees.

No reputable scientific organisation would claim any significance from such worthless data, which in itself shows how politicised the Met Office has become.

And with perfect timing, Chris Morrison reveals the latest Met Office temperature tampering scandal:

 

image

The UK Met Office has over 100 non-existent weather stations where it estimates temperature data using information from "well-correlated neighbouring sites". However, it refuses to identify any of the sites used and bats away Freedom of Information (FOI) requests with the excuse that they are “vexatious” and not in the public interest. But today the Climate Skeptic can reveal recent work that shows how in the case of the fictitious site at Lowestoft there are no open weather stations for miles around, well-correlated or otherwise. Unless the Met Office can finally reveal its workings out, the only realistic conclusion to draw is that the data are invented. It is the ‘smoking gun’ that demands a full public explanation from the Met Office.

https://www.climateskeptic.org/p/science-shock-smoking-gun-evidence

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/woGWBCO

August 26, 2025 at 02:14PM

Poll shows 83% of Australians don’t want higher emissions targets

By Jo Nova

Another propaganda poll asks loaded cost-free fantasy-questions to maximize fake “support” for higher emissions targets.

The Resolve Political Monitor always lets the hapless pollee know what they are supposed to say. Look at the way they frame it — the pollsters are supposed to be trying to figure out what kind of Net Zero targets Australians want, but they’re not framing it in terms of science, or what other countries are doing, or whether it worth spending $1.5 trillion to cool the world by 0.0 degrees. They frame the question by telling the voter that “both parties support a net zero target” but some in the Nationals would like to “ditch” it. Then they ask the crowd “what’s best for Australia”.

Presumably they’re hoping to fool Australians into thinking that most people support Net Zero targets (“Both major parties support it”.) Yet, despite this effort to plant the consensus opinion in people’s minds, only 28% of Australians say the current target is the right one. Some 55% of Australia reject this or don’t know what to think.

And only 17% of Australians want the Santa Claus option — the free, uncosted, “more ambitious” 2030 target. And we […]

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/13eli9g

August 26, 2025 at 01:05PM