New Plan To Rob The Citizenry

Henry VIII accused the Catholic monasteries in England of corruption, shut them down, stole their money – and kept it for himself and his friends. “New York to fine fossil fuel companies $75 billion under new climate law” New York … Continue reading →

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/6QvdTlC

December 29, 2024 at 08:54AM

Monday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/VzD2mCp

December 29, 2024 at 08:43AM

Recent Temperature Falls Likely to Put a Dampener on ‘Hottest Year Evah’ Stories

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

by Chris Morrison

Stand by for another bout of ‘Hottest Year Evah’ stories as the mainstream media pursues its campaign to induce mass climate psychosis and prepare the ground for the oncoming Net Zero catastrophe. Alas, enjoy it only a little while longer since this story may have to be retired after putting in such a sterling propaganda shift. Global temperatures are falling like a stone, while the oceans are cooling at a remarkably rapid rate. In the U.K., the year is likely to show a second annual temperature fall since the alleged ‘record’ year in 2022.

Only last May, Matt McGrath and Justin Rowlatt at the BBC were claiming that “fuelled by climate change” the world’s oceans had broken temperature records every single day over the past year. Planet-warming gases were said to be “mostly to blame”. Three days were singled out when the previous highs were beaten by 0.34°C. Inexplicably, the story, a matter it might be thought of some ongoing concern, was not followed up. The graph below, compiled from data supplied by the U.S. weather service NOAA, might help explain why.

Over a period of just a few months after the article was written, the global sea temperature over a large area of the world’s oceans has shown a dramatic reduction of 0.5°C. It is now back to the level seen in 2015. Consider what that means. Two years of relentless scare mongering about uncontrolled ocean warming from UN chief Antonio ‘boiling’ Guterres to media climate comedy turn Jim “jail the deniers” Dale has been suddenly thrown onto the ever-expanding scrapheap of failed climate scares. Further temperature reductions are highly likely in the next few months, particularly if a natural La Nina cooling variation develops as expected. In the Pacific, temperature anomalies in the Nino areas are now in negative territory. This fact and the graph above also signals an end to much of the twaddle written by the Guardian. Before we move on and reclaim sanity, who can forget this bilge from its environment editor Damian Carrington: “‘Astonishing’ ocean temperatures in 2023 supercharged ‘freak’ weather around the world as the climate crisis continued to intensify.”

Land temperatures are also falling with the UAH satellite record recently showing some significant monthly falls. Except for satellites accurately measuring the atmosphere near the Earth, we must treat most land surface temperature numbers with caution if not cynicism given how much we have recently discovered about urban heat corruption, invented data, retrospective adjustments and scandalously lax station siting policies. Nevertheless, it would appear that land temperatures are starting to fall and cooler oceans will hasten this process. 

The last couple of years have seen a temperature spike and some scientists have sought to provide explanations. A recent paper from the EU weather service Copernicus argued that the warming spike was driven by a strong naturally occurring El Nino. This natural variation originates in the Pacific and transfers heat around the globe affecting weather patterns and temperatures. Interestingly, Copernicus noted that the 0.29°C spike was not unprecedented in the observation record since a slightly larger rise occurred in 1976-77. Other suggestions to explain the short temperature spike include recent reductions in atmospheric particulates caused by cleaner marine fuels, increased solar activity and the 2022 Hunga Tonga volcanic boost to water vapour in the upper atmosphere. Meanwhile, a new paper published this month in Science states that warming since 2013 and the spike in 2023 was helped by a reduction in cloud cover. This meant that more solar radiation reached the Earth’s surface.

What this latest episode of climate hysteria shows is that despite vast amounts of computer power and a huge pool of money, most climate science is stuck in a ‘settled’ dark age. Any departure from a climatic norm is seen by activist scientists and their faithful media messengers as a linear progression to Armageddon. The role of natural variation is constantly downplayed, scientists who depart from the ‘settled’ narrative of humans controlling the climate thermostat are cancelled while press-released pseudoscience is disseminated to persuade unquestioning journalists to attribute individual weather events to humans. All the while the Net Zero zealots prepare their battleplans to command and control every aspect of human existence. One such potential strike is currently passing through the British Parliament in the form of a private member’s bill that appears to have the support of almost a third of the House of Commons. Recently in the Daily Sceptic, Paul Homewood presented a worrying analysis of the hideous proposals contained in the Climate and Nature Bill. He concluded:

Net Zero is already doing great harm, but if this bill becomes law, the country will be unrecognisable in 10 years’ time. There will be energy and food shortages, industry will be decimated, private transport and foreign holidays a thing of the past. What we take for granted today will be unaffordable for most. And there will be nothing we can do about it.

Want to know why you have been fed a diet of runaway temperatures and boiling oceans of late? Look no further than the current antics of virtuous clueless fools indulging their luxury middle-class beliefs while determined to pursue a collectivist agenda whatever the human cost.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/mFlTn6w

December 29, 2024 at 08:07AM

How the DOJ Spies on Us on its Website

The website of the Department of Justice (www[.]justice[.]gov) mirrors the troubling practices of the Biden administration it represents.
Fig. 1. The DOJ website and collaborators obtain data from visitors’ computers

Data Collection and Sharing with Third Parties

Fig. 1[1] shows how the DOJ website collects visitors’ private with the aid of at least multiple private companies, including entirely foreign entities. This collaboration comprises allowing those companies to access the visitors’ computers [2] and to collect private data from them. Among the collaborators are multiple Google divisions. DoubleClick collects, collates, and exploits users’ private data from almost all the web and uses it for advertising. YouTube does the same and captures every mouse movement over its video rectangle and precise moments when users start, pause, or stop videos. GoogleTagManager collects user data for the DOJ website but retains and utilizes its copy. A foreign-based SiteImproveAnalytics operates similarly to GoogleTagManager (Google Analytics) and adds little or no value.

Scope of Data Collection

The DOJ website sends private data to these third parties, including the visited page and precise timestamp, the visitor’s IP address (sufficient for Google to identify visitors), and information from users’ devices, including languages and some installed applications.[3]

Embedded YouTube videos are of a Trojan horse. All user interactions with them, even moving a mouse over, are meticulously logged.[4] Hypothetically, if a user pauses during a statement by Attorney General Merrick Garland or replays a specific segment, this behavior is recorded and potentially analyzed. Such granular data could be used to infer user attitudes or intentions.

Google incorporates this data into its vast troves of user information, applies machine learning to analyze it, and builds detailed profiles of users. These profiles are just a warrant away from the DOJ and a subpoena away from third parties with an axe to grind.

Difference from Private Businesses

Private businesses routinely collect and analyze visitors’ data, but

  1. The IV Amendment and the Privacy Act of 1974 do not bind most private businesses but do bind the DOJ.
  2. Private businesses do that to evaluate and increase their marketing campaigns’ effectiveness and maximize sales. The DOJ has neither of these reasons. The only explanation (except for incompetence and/or corruption) is that the DOJ does that for surveillance.
  3. There are legitimate reasons for web traffic analysis on government websites. They can implement it internally by purchasing analytic software from private companies and installing it on their websites.
Q1: Why does the DOJ spy on Americans visiting its website? 
Q2: Why does the DOJ receive and give aid to foreign entities in spying on Americans? 

Many government websites collect visitors’ data and compromise privacy by entwinement with Google. The DOJ website also stands out in its collaboration with foreign entities.[5]

Questionable Use of CDNs

The DOJ website is intended solely for the American audience. Because of the high bandwidth and low delays in the North American networks, it does not need to use a Content Delivery Network (CDN).[6] Yet, it uses at least two CDNs, including the foreign-based and somewhat shady jsdelivr[.]net.

These networks receive much of the same user data as justice[.]gov and further expose visitors’ privacy and national security to unnecessary risks.

Q3: Why does the DOJ so generously share data with foreign entities? 
Footnotes

[1] The screenshot was made on Dec 27, 2024, using Microsoft Edge with default settings. To reproduce, go to Settings >> More Tools >> Developer Tools, then select Source on the top.

[2] This is how it works. When a user visits a website, the web server returns a page containing some text and instructions for the user’s browser to request additional elements, such as pictures and frames. The browser executes these instructions. Unknown to the visitors, the DOJ web pages contain requests designed solely to send information from the visitor’s computer or mobile phone to third parties, such as Google Analytics.
There are also requests to download elements from data-collecting sites, such as doubleclick[.]net and cdn[.]jsdelivr[.]net. Each request includes private data.

[3] You can check what information your browser sends in the HTTP header.

[4] The Network screen under the Developer Tools shows traffic between the browser and the servers, including calls to Google (YouTube and other data collectors) and other data collection sites.

[5] It also shows an almost comic lack of self-awareness: Justice Department Issues Final Rule Addressing Threat Posed by Foreign Adversaries’ Access to Americans’ Sensitive Personal Data. December 27, 2024.

[6] Within the North America, RTT < 90ms, even including the last mile delivery. CDN does not help with the last mile. Some gaming or near real-time websites would benefit from a small decrease in the delay (like 40ms instead of 60ms) provided by a CDN, but that does not matter for justice[.]gov.

via Science Defies Politics

https://ift.tt/Rku4TXb

December 29, 2024 at 07:36AM