From Legal Insurrection

Meanwhile, Association of American Medical Colleges did a survey and found that 55% of medical schools reported that the health effects of climate change were a required topic in their courses.

Posted by Leslie Eastman

While I don’t suffer from asthma, I know friends with children who do. I have seen direction that the use of inhalers are crucial for managing asthma effectively. They deliver medication directly to the lungs, providing faster relief and better control of symptoms.

Yet, in the quest to eliminate “greenhouse gases” based on climate crisis pseudoscience, they were targeted in a study by Stanford Health Care.

Dr. Jyothi Tirumalasetty, M.D., says research is zeroing in on propellants known as HFCs or hydrofluorocarbons. They push the medicine out of the inhaler in measured doses but can also escape into the atmosphere at alarming levels.

“These HFCs are hydrofluorocarbons and propellants, which now we know trap heat in the atmosphere thousands of times more powerfully than carbon dioxide and increase, you know, worse, global warming,” Tirumalasetty said.

She says some inhalers can emit as much greenhouse gas as the average gasoline-powered car driven for 60 miles.

To better understand those levels, Tirumalasetty and her colleagues used safety data and prescription records for inhalers in the U.S. They found traditional devices, known as metered dose inhalers, release the most HFCs — about 98% of the total — but also vary widely from brand to brand.

In fact, in the United Kingdom, doctors have been told to stop ­prescribing blue asthma ­inhalers under National Health Service (NHS) ­guidance that assert the devices cause ­climate change.

Of course inhalers damage the planet. They keep asthmatics alive thus allowing them to continue having a carbon footprint for decades. Your existence is a problem for the managerial class to solve. pic.twitter.com/ksgTdM5owe

— Peter Hague (@peterrhague) November 27, 2024

Even if this gases did everything the “experts” claim, the solar cycles will remain the most significant influence on the planet’s climate. And, I doubt the impact on temperature will negatively impact quality of life as much as the inability to breath.

However, common sense is not preventing European medical schools from pushing senseless climate change priorities and “green prescribing” on their students.

Future doctors will be expected to take the climate impact of inhalers into account, medical school leaders have said.
They will also have more training on how to recognise and treat heatstroke, while mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue fever will become a more prominent part of the curriculum at European medical schools.

Insiders stressed that the curriculum is yet to be finalised and advice surrounding inhalers is just one option that could be considered.

The initiative – overseen by the European Network on Climate and Health Education, which is made up of a group of 25 medical schools led by the University of Glasgow – will bring climate lessons into the curriculum of more than 10,000 students.

…Students will be taught “green prescribing”, in which doctors should encourage patients to take up activities such as community gardening and tree planting. This is alongside “active travel”, which includes walking or cycling rather than driving. Both activities offer health benefits to individuals while being positive for the environment.

But, not to worry: The cost of the inhalers will be price-capped by Big Pharma.

The pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca has agreed to cap out-of-pocket costs for climate friendly asthma inhalers at $35, a move applauded by lawmakers for having potential benefits on the environment and patients.

The news follows an investigation by POLITICO’s E&E News into how developing emissions-free inhalers could help AstraZeneca and another inhaler-maker, GlaxoSmithKline, undermine competition for at least a decade by bringing old medications under new patent protection.

AsrtaZeneca and GSK are currently developing the so-called green inhalers, which don’t rely on hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, as propellants to push the medicine into patients’ lungs, like conventional inhalers.

As a reminder, HFCs were originally used as replacement gases for those that were identified as depleting the ozone.

These “climate-friendly inhalers” could work as well as the others, but the choice of medication should be made between the doctor and patient and not based on recommendations from agenda-driven eco-activists. The only calculation that should be made whether the devices deliver the correct amount of medication to the user in a timely fashion at a reasonable cost.

And while the European medical schools are instituting these programs, it must be noted that the Association of American Medical Colleges did a survey and found that 55% of medical schools reported that the health effects of climate change were a required topic in their courses in 2022. That doubled from 27% two years prior.

The trend lines do not look positive for those who prefer to make human health and comfort a priority.

As the Director of Education and Policy at the Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment (C-CHANGE) and Assistant Professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Basu has led the creation of a new interdisciplinary climate change and planetary health concentration that will launch this fall and be available to every student at the school.

“We see the benefits of having individuals with very diverse disciplinary backgrounds and lived experiences think and learn and create climate solutions together,” he says.

As Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Basu has helped insert climate change into every aspect of the four-year curriculum. He describes and evaluates this process in a new paper, published May 29 in PLOS Climate, called “Climate Change, Environment, and Health: The Implementation and Initial Evaluation of a Longitudinal, Integrated Curricular Theme and Novel Competency Framework at Harvard Medical School.”

Hopefully, we can reverse this trend so people return to being the priority.

From CLIMATE DEPOT

By Marc Morano

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/dec/24/trump-effect-undermines-u-n-climate-summit

By Marc Morano – 

The 2024 U.N. Climate Change Conference in Baku, Azerbaijan, recently wrapped up. The summit can be summed up in one phrase: The orange man derailed it.

The election of former President Donald Trump a few days before the Conference of the Parties, known as COP29, began had a profound impact on zapping any potential success from the summit. The Times of London wrote that the “wind was taken out of [COP29’s] sails before it even started with the election of climate-skeptic Donald Trump in the U.S.”

The disillusionment of COP29’s attendees was palpable. No major Western leaders bothered to show up in Baku except the U.K.’s newly minted prime minister, Keir Starmer.

---

‘Total waste of time’

The supposedly sinking Pacific island nations could not even muster up enthusiasm for COP29 as the nation of Papua New Guinea boycotted the confab, declaring it a “total waste of time.”

France boycotted attending COP29. Politico reported, “The French climate minister’s withdrawal means Paris will not send any high-level political representative to Baku, as French President Emmanuel Macron will also skip the event.” Oui oui!

Oil is a ‘gift of God’

It gets better. In what can be described only as the “Trump effect,” Argentina withdrew its negotiators from the summit after President Javier Milei held talks with Mr. Trump; Argentina’s entire team was ordered home.

“We have instructions from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to no longer participate,” Argentina’s top environmental official told The Guardian.

There’s more.

The opening day of the U.N. climate summit featured Ilham Aliyev, Azerbaijan’s president, declaring oil a “gift of God” and said people need oil. As you can imagine, Mr. Aliyev’s invoking God to defend the use of oil enraged and demoralized the attendees of COP29.

The BBC reported on the oily mess, noting in a headline: “UN climate talks ‘no longer fit for purpose’ say key experts.”

U.N. officials turn on — the U.N.

The COP process needs “an urgent overhaul,” according to an open letter by the former U.N. secretary-general, the former U.N. climate chief and other U.N. supporters, the BBC reported. The erstwhile U.N. officials demanded that “countries should not host the talks if they don’t support the phase-out of fossil energy.”

Former Vice President Al Gore agreed, saying: “I think that there should be a test for who is qualified to be a delegate to these COPs. Are they coming to try to find a solution or are they coming in order to block a solution?”

In other words, censor and ban any nation from the U.N. climate process that dissents in any way from the U.N. agenda. They appear to want to run the U.N. climate summits like a “woke”  social media platform.

‘Worst U.N. climate summit’ ever!

COP29 was initially billed as the COP finance summit. The original $100 billion-a-year climate slush fund was pledged to increase to $300 billion a year. But no one seemed happy about these “pledges.”

The Times of London reported on the utter failure of the summit. “Cop29 was described by veteran negotiators as the worst UN climate summit they had experienced.”

And here’s one more scoop from CNN: “COP29 was described by climate activists as ‘an insult, a joke and a betrayal. … A conference of chaos.”

A fake dead whale

One final bizarre note: COP29 featured a dead fake whale made of what appeared to be petroleum-based products on display in downtown Baku. The fake whale carcass had a backdrop of COP29’s neon messaging on a building, complete with a windmill. Just to be clear, the climate activists who sponsored this fake dead whale stunt believed that climate change is a threat to whales — and windmills will somehow save the whales.

No irony is lost in the fact that since the rapid ascent of offshore wind, deaths of actual whales have skyrocketed.

As with every U.N. climate summit, many studies are timed to be released in the weeks and days before the conference to maximize the alleged importance of the U.N.’s mission. This year’s round of studies was quite humorous. A study in the journal Lancet claimed that “Climate change is causing sleep loss.”

Not to be outdone, a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Environment, Development and Sustainability actually claimed that “climate change is encouraging unsanitary toilet practices among vulnerable communities.” How? “Climate change makes toilets more likely to break, which leaves people more likely to ‘go’ outside.’”

Remember: Don’t ever question “the science”!

Meat tax for thee

The conference featured prominent speeches calling for meat rationing and a global “meat tax” to limit “cow emissions.” Willem Branten of the group True Animal Protein Price Coalition called for meat taxes “so that we can pay for the damages done by our past consumption of meat and animal proteins.”

The U.N. was full of meat hypocrisy as delegates chowed down on beef, chicken and hot dogs at the restaurants and food courts of COP29.

As Mr. Trump prepares to return to the White House, we must remember: The failure of a U.N. climate summit is great news for humanity!

• Marc Morano manages the award-winning ClimateDepot.com news and information service. He served as a reporter for Rush Limbaugh’s television show and as a senior adviser to Sen. James Inhofe.