Are Eastern Pacific Cyclones Become More Frequent or Stronger?

From the Cliff Mass Weather Blog

Cliff Mass

During the past three days, I have received several calls from media folks asking the same question: 

Are storms like this week’s “bomb” cyclone becoming stronger or more frequent due to global warming? 

If not, will global warming cause such increases in the future?

The answer to these questions is quite clear:  NO.

There is convincing scientific evidence that our region has not seen an increase in such storms and that a warming planet will not bring more meteorological “bombs” into our region.

First Some Terminology

A midlatitude (or extratropical) cyclone is a low-pressure center with winds rotating counterclockwise around it in the northern hemisphere.   The strength of the cyclone is generally quantified by the central pressure, although size is also important.  Generally, the lower the central pressure, the stronger the cyclone and the more powerful the winds.

As shown by the figure below, cyclones generally form in regions of strong horizontal temperature change….in fact, such temperature contrasts are the fuel of such storms.

Regarding central pressures, garden variety storms in our region have pressures around 990-1000 hPa.   Strong storms perhaps 980-990 hPa, and powerful cyclones have pressures of t965-980 hPa, with extreme storms even less.

Tuesday’s storm dropped to an astounding 943 hPa, tying the record for the past 70 years.

Cyclones that rev up particularly rapidly are called “bombs”…..and the media has certainly fallen in love with this term.   By definition, bomb cyclones deepen by 24 hPa or more in 24 h.  This definition is completely arbitrary.  Really just for fun.

Are Local Cyclones Getting Stronger?

The answer is clearly no.  There has been no increase in the frequency or intensity of landfilling or near-shore cyclones in our region.  

Most of the famous local cyclones occurred during the early to mid-20th century, with the last major landfalling cyclone in 2006 (the Chanukah Eve Storm).

Another way to demonstrate the lack of increase in storms is to plot sea level pressure over time at a point on the Washington Coast (Ocean Shores).   As shown below, there is no evidence for an increase in the lowest pressures (say below 980 hPa).


Will Global Warming Increase Strong Windstorms Over the Region?

A group of us at the UW (in association with the UW Climate Impacts Group) did a formal study of this question, funded by Seattle City Light.  

We made use of a state-of-science regional climate model driven by an ensemble of Global Climate Models.   

This research did not find an increase in extreme winds over the region (we examined several locations).  A graphic from the analysis of the extreme wind trends through the end of the century is shown below.

There are good scientific reasons to expect little change in the intensity of midlatitude cyclones over our region.

For example, global warming preferentially warms the Arctic in the lower atmosphere, thus weakening the north-south temperature difference that drives the storms.   On the other hand, the temperature change is strengthened aloft, with the result being a wash for the storms.

In summary,  natural variability and processes sometimes can come together to produce very intense cyclones like the one we experienced on Tuesday.

We experienced a rare, extreme event and there is no reason to expect that such storms will become more frequent as the planet slowly warms.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/trYqVWG

November 27, 2024 at 08:04AM

Milloy talks getting out of the Paris climate hoax and ending environmental overregulation with Rob Schmitt and Diana Furchtgott-Roth on Newsmax

From the November 26, 2024 episode of Rob Schmitt Tonight.

via JunkScience.com

https://ift.tt/yfVRvdO

November 27, 2024 at 04:33AM

Subsidies cannot support the diverse eight billion on this planet

Government picking energy winners and losers fails.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/Zz4VJ3v

November 27, 2024 at 04:19AM

Holbeach No 2 WMO 03469 – A variable pitch?

52.87344 0.13854 Met Office Assessed CIMO Class 2 Installed 1/1/1985

A rather strange coastal site on The Wash it is better known as Holbeach Air Weapons Range. The Met Office was historically a branch of the Ministry of Defence (unsurprisingly so was the Ordnance Survey) and military locations still dominate Met Office sites. As a consequence public access to the vicinity of many weather sites is often heavily restricted or never allowed.

It is only in the modern internet age that scrutiny of such sites is partially possible through the likes of aerial imagery and the often promotional films produced from some sites. Recent site imagery of Holbeach calls its high CIMO rating into question.

Holbeach is only an occasional performer in the daily “Extremes” listing but appeared for the 25th November as a regional high. I do feel counting this coastal site as “East Midlands” is a bit odd.

Tim Channon reviewed the site and was unsure how it should be rated but at the time only had an aerial image to work from.

A noticeable point in his review was the short term spike of the temperature high point he referred to. This is noticeably similar to the graph for 25th November shown on WeatherObs where the reported maximum of 11.2°C was almost a degree higher than any hourly readings.

The subsequent advent of internet tools and more imagery now tends towards a different view. The site is quoted as at 3 metres amsl but just 8 metres away Elevation Finder indicates a height of 6 metres.

This warranted further imagery search to confirm the reason for this discrepancy and produced firstly from Google maps this.

The white square appearing just above the red and white striped pole is the screen which gives a useful scaling device as the base is 1.5 metres above ground level. The steps behind lead up to the coastal path indicating the screen sits at the bottom of a significant slope. Further confirmation of more height differentials comes from professional quality imagery courtesy of Jon Combe.

This image extract close up shows the screen on an artificially excavated shelf at the bottom of the upward slope to the east and a further downward slop to the west. Whilst this is not a “bad” site, the unnatural nature of the site and not representing the surrounding area makes it hard to justify its Class 2 status of 100% accuracy. At best this site is Class 3 or more reasonably considered Class 4.

I would welcome the views of any trained meteorological observers on the operational validity of this site.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/OZcuPwW

November 27, 2024 at 04:04AM