Special interest subsidies DO NOT support the diverse 8 billion on this planet.

The billions living in developing countries ARE NOT benefiting from Government subsidies.

Guest essay co-authored by Ronald Stein, Oliver Hemmers, and Steve Curtis

When governments go into business, citizens start to suffer. When governments support laws that promote a level of economic playing field for all in a free enterprise system, citizens prosper.  A good example of this is the United States. Under the free enterprise system, this small coalition of little more than 13 disparate colonies grew to become the most imposing industrial power in the world in just over 100 years.

Under the current system, in which government spending picks winners and losers in the business world and hires massive numbers of people, we have amassed an unsupportable debt of more than $100,000 per person. This is beyond the personal debt that is burdening our citizens today. Yet, we still have advocates who want to transfer personal debt to national debt and further burden our posterity. This cannot end well.

The poorest Americans are richer than most of humanity. Of the eight billion people now on this planet, more than five billion live on less than $10.00 a day, almost half the world — over three billion people — live on less than $2.50 a day, and billions have little to no access to electricity. This is the benefit of dictatorships and oligarchies disguised as democratic republics controlling these disadvantaged people.

The most important commodities we have today are the products and fuels made from fossil fuels that did not exist 200 years ago. Oil produces raw materials for more than 6,000 products manufactured by different industries, which are demanded by the 8 billion people on this planet. Without oil, all of our products would cost much more.   

The fossil fuel industry also provides transportation fuels. Today, we have more than 50,000 merchant ships, more than 20,000 commercial aircraft, and more than 50,000 military aircraft that use fuel manufactured from crude oil. The fuels to move the heavy-weight and long-range needs of jets moving people and products, the merchant ships for global trade flows, and the military and space programs are also dependent on what can be manufactured from crude oil. Those fuels also support the 1.4 billion cars in the world and the 14 million trucks registered in the world.

The second most important commodity we have today is electricity. It is the perfect commodity to control on a national level to enhance the boot of oppression on its citizens. Subsidies for continuous, uninterruptible, and dispatchable power from coal, natural gas, and nuclear are JUST for electricity, the same electricity that CANNOT exist without the products and components made from the oil derivatives manufactured from fossil fuels. Subsidies help control the production of electricity in a manner that keeps it scarce and expensive.

Most electricity is produced with coal and natural gas. Natural gas is replacing coal, but beyond that, the mix has not changed much despite the massive subsidies poured into the coffers of those willing to incorporate inefficient and expensive production of electricity in favor of inexpensive and plentiful sources. This is reflected in the fact that coal and natural gas are producing 95% or more of the proportion of electricity they were even a decade ago. Renewable energy subsidies have driven costs for electricity to double or triple their retail costs in some countries compared to a decade ago, even though quality of air has suffered in that same time frame.

Yet many advocate ridding the world of coal, natural gas, and oil no matter how much it costs people. Maybe we ought to rethink this radical and expensive transition. Remember, you, the citizens, pay for all government expenses, including the costs of electricity production infrastructure, whether it is in taxes or direct utility bills.

We all know that special interests financially support the Government decision-makers, and thus, Government policies financially support special interests with subsidies. The Press paints these subsidies as “free money,” and we seem to ignore that this money really comes from the poor people and their children. If rich people paid the taxes, they would not remain rich, so it must come from somewhere.

Since subsidies come from all of us, maybe we should be careful how we use them. It turns out that most of the subsidies go to foreign businesses, many of which support the exploitation of slave labor to mine for the “green” minerals and metals to produce windmills, solar panels, and EV batteries, as well as the infliction of environmental degradation to “their” landscapes to reinforce mandated EV’s, wind turbines, and solar panels in “our backyards”!

We also pay foreign companies to install them. This reality reveals the imperialistic nature of US politics, which exploits the world’s poor people to fuel our desire for luxury. This is patently immoral.

The “renewables” industries would disappear without US government subsidies.

Ironically, allowing free enterprise competition to supply your electricity would result in far lower costs to the consumer, as it does for all products. In fact, nuclear power is the cheapest and least imposing way to produce electricity when all subsidies are eliminated. This was proven in the 1960s and 1970s throughout the world. Today, China leads the world in the production of new nuclear power plants.  Are they seeing something the rest of the world is not?

How do countries justify personal power and control of their citizens through a subsidy process that takes money from their people to produce an inferior product and increase their daily expenses?

Since the US took the lead in all technological advancements during the Industrial Revolution, which started in the mid-to-late 1800s, it makes sense that we lead the rest of the world into the production of cheap, clean energy using nuclear power. One way to do that would be to petition individual state Governors to show the Federal government how it is done. Compete the production and delivery of electricity like our citizens demanded of the long-distance phone call business. After all, how better would your life be with competitive one cent per kWh electricity over the possibility of one dollar per kWh electricity that data centers would bid for electricity if production stayed the same while their demands soared?

When people know the possibilities, the transition to nuclear power will happen quickly. The transition should happen without the elimination of cheap production of electricity through natural gas and coal until the market drives the transition to nuclear power. Imagine the massive increase in quality of life worldwide with easily affordable electricity delivered to every household.

If the US does not take the lead with a “New Nuclear Posture for a Hungry World” that is fully supported by Oliver Stone’s 105-minute movie NUCLEAR NOW, our adversaries will.


Ronald Stein P.E.

Ambassador for Energy & Infrastructure, Co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations”, policy advisor on energy literacy for The Heartland Institute, and The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, and National TV Commentator- Energy & Infrastructure with Rick Amato.

Ronald Stein, P.E. is an engineer, energy consultant, speaker, author of books and articles on energy, environmental policy, and human rights, and Founder of PTS Advance, a California based company.

Ron advocates that energy literacy starts with the knowledge that renewable energy is only intermittent electricity generated from unreliable breezes and sunshine, as wind turbines and solar panels cannot manufacture anything for the 8 billion on this planet.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/JkgnxD3

November 26, 2024 at 04:08AM

Nation’s first congestion pricing tolls back on track for New York City

With the election passed, NY climate masochism continues apace.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/J4edQu0

November 26, 2024 at 03:19AM

CLIMATE PROPAGANDA GENTLY PROMOTED ON BBC RADIO SHOW

Getting the public to be convinced that the climate is somehow in an emergency is a difficult job when most of us see nothing much seems to have changed within our (mostly short) living memory. One way of doing this is to allow one-sided conversations to be played out on radio shows, like the one exposed in this video. The video shows how one hapless listener called Dave was be-littled on air for daring to suggest that the alarmism was misplaced. Admittedly he didn’t help himself by saying he got his information from a blog, but even so he deserved a fair hearing. Listen to it here and see what you think:

 BBC Propaganda Exposed

via climate science

https://ift.tt/Xpxdr2Z

November 26, 2024 at 01:47AM

COP29: ‘Animal Farm’ Moment

Climate scientist/activist Joyce Kimutai gave a frank assessment of the just completed two-week UN climate conference of parties (COP 29) on social media. Hers is a refreshing take in comparison to the whining of the developing (statist) countries seeking handouts and the glass-one-eighth-full newspaper reporting from the mainstream media. She began:

Now, as I recover from the exhaustion of the past weeks, I find myself sitting on my couch, sipping sweet Kenyan tea, while reflecting on the outcomes of COP29.

As the climate crisis deepens, multilateralism is weakening, leaving vulnerable communities at the center of geopolitical tensions. The $300 billion commitment is both insignificant and shameful in the grand scheme of addressing the climate emergency.

I participated in numerous negotiation and coordination sessions, as well as side events. One side event focused on the need to improve scenarios to better represent an equitable world. Another explored synergies between the planned IPCC report on adaptation guidelines, indicators, and metrics and the ongoing work under the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA) . In all these discussions, I gave my absolute best.

As for the outcomes, they left much to be desired. The principles of the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement call for developed countries to take the lead in reducing emissions and providing financial, technological, and capacity-building support to developing nations. This is essential to foster international cooperation and partnerships in addressing the climate crisis. However, Annex I (developed) countries appear unwilling to fully honor these obligations.

Instead, they argue that wealthier developing countries, such as China and the Gulf states, should contribute to climate finance and support other developing nations, due to their current emissions. These countries, in turn, reject this notion, emphasizing that Annex I nations have failed to lead while disregarding their historical responsibility for the climate crisis. This deep disagreement fuels division. Meanwhile, at the heart of this stalemate are vulnerable communities bearing the brunt of escalating climate impacts and nations, particularly in Africa, drowning in debt as they attempt to address the worsening crisis.

And then came the dramatic end. In a last-minute standoff, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) staged a premature walkout, demanding clarity on their share. Sadly, they lost. We, the Non-Annex I countries, lost. The Annex I countries got their way. To make matters worse, the COP Presidency controversially wielded the gavel to push the decision through, ignoring requests for the floor. It was, quite frankly, an “Animal Farm” moment.

Enough said in 325 words. I commented:

What did you expect? And now, is it back to the science to qualify the alarm?

Elsewhere, Kimutai stated: “I often question myself whether it’s worth attending COP, and my answer is always the same: giving up and letting them win is not an option.” Let who win? What about consumers and taxpayers and the land/seascape spared of energy sprawl from wind, solar, and batteries? Is human betterment the standard, or your preconceived ideas about CO2 as the enemy, not the friend?

The post COP29: ‘Animal Farm’ Moment appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

https://ift.tt/yo4PSNQ

November 26, 2024 at 01:10AM