£1 Billion Scheme Could Deliver Low Carbon Heating to London’s Landmarks

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Paul Kolk

 

Just another billion!

 

 

 image

The heat for the Westminster scheme will come from ‘innovative sources,’ such as the London Underground and the Thames.

A new £1 billion infrastructure project has been launched in Westminster to provide low carbon heating for some of London’s most famous buildings.

The heat network could serve landmark buildings like the Houses of Parliament and the National Gallery, alongside buildings owned by Westminster City Council and the government.

Initiated by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) and Westminster Council, the scheme involves heat network developers Hemiko and Vital Energi that form the South Westminster Area Network (SWAN) Partnership.

Unveiled on Wednesday, the project will source low carbon heating from within the local area, including the river Thames, the London Underground and the sewer network.

“These new low-carbon district heat networks will tap into local waste heat sources, delivering clean and affordable energy to those who need it most. The SWAN project will be a crucial piece of our net zero carbon journey in Westminster, leading the way for others and showing what a positive clean energy future could look like,” said leader of Westminster City Council, Adam Hug.

The project is expected to create 500 jobs and save 75,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide every year, improving air quality and boosting businesses.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/1-billion-scheme-could-deliver-low-carbon-heating-to-londons-landmarks-5755361?utm_campaign=socialshare_email&utm_source=email

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/s7EcFh4

November 8, 2024 at 03:51AM

‘I spent thousands upgrading to an energy C rating. What happened next will shock you’

By Paul Homewood

h/t Paul Kolk

 

 

 image

As a downsizing portfolio landlord, I have what I call a “keeper list”.

These are the few properties I will keep until the day I die that will (hopefully) provide me with a pension.

The “keepers” are in a mix of locations, but they are all, bar one, Victorian. They are well-located, well-built, solid properties with good sized rooms, character features and a lovely feel. They are also popular with tenants and make really smashing homes.

But, as a landlord with two decades of experience, I really should know better. Victorian properties are built with solid walls (no cavities), they are draughty, prone to damp and have really old roofs. This means they’re expensive to maintain and also are poor performers when it comes to EPC ratings.

The problem is, I just can’t love a new-build the way I love my old Viccy places, so I’ve made peace with my decision and see the challenge of making them fit for modern day living (and better EPC ratings) as part of their charm.

Deluded? I probably am. However, I’ve made it my mission to future-proof my investments, and so that’s what I’m doing.

Well, so I thought.

At great expense, I’ve carried out internal wall insulation and upgraded the electric storage heaters in my one-bedroom Victorian flat (I’d already fitted double glazing years ago).

There’s no gas and, given it’s a flat, no way to do something fancy with solar panels or heat pumps, so I elected to purchase two high heat retention storage heaters, which cost £2,500 with the installation.

I chose these top of the range models because I was assured they would help me achieve the hallowed EPC “C” rating, which rented properties are required to have by 2030, up from the current grade “E”.

The assessor had already told me I only needed one heater to improve the score, but as I also wanted to improve the quality of a tenant’s life, I bought an extra – rather than a panel heater, which I could have done without lowering the EPC rating.

Having also installed lovely wooden flooring, I called the assessor and asked him to revisit the property. I still had a couple of years left on the old certificate, but wanted to get it done now to show potential tenants the new enhanced ratings.

Imagine my surprise when the certificate came back with a “D”, just one grade higher than it was previously.

Cue angry phone call.

“I did what you said, why have I not got a ‘C’?”

“You didn’t install 50mm insulation under the floor.”

“But it’s got floorboards, plyboard, insulated underlay and then wood flooring – surely that’s enough?”

“I’m sorry, Secret Landlord, you needed to insulate under the floor.”

“But,” I said, “I’ve been doing research on this and I worry it may rot the joists, there’s a fear it may breach the damp proof course and cause other issues.”

“They don’t care about that on the EPC.”

“So, what am I going to do?”

“I suggest you either rip up the floor and insulate, or accept the ‘D’. They’re changing the software in January, so you may be better off just doing it now.”

“Sorry, what?” I exclaimed.

“Yes, from January we have to measure all the windows, say what direction they’re facing and list the age. Electric heating will also potentially get downgraded because the new update includes heating costs and electric is more expensive to run. To be honest, I don’t understand why the Government is pushing heat pumps because having them could potentially lose you up to 11 points.”

“OK, so you’re essentially saying we’re having a window tax by the back door and the electric revolution they’re pushing is going to penalise me?”

“It’s a mess. The new tests will take double the time so the costs of an EPC will go up, I also wouldn’t be surprised if many assessors quit – loads left during the Green Deal.”

“OK,” I said, reeling from this new information. “What is it I should do?”

“Well, if you lower the ceiling by 400mm that will give you three extra points, you do have very high ceilings.”

Cue insane laughter. So insane, the assessor had to cut across my guffaws.

“But honestly, I don’t think the Government will stick to the ‘C’ grade, I think they’ll lower it to ‘D’. Also, they may drop that metric altogether as it’s measuring the wrong thing – it’s not in line with carbon reduction, and that’s what they’re trying to do.”

Dear reader, I am at an absolute loss. I have spent thousands to improve the energy rating of a property, which could get downgraded in the next software update in a few months. I’ve tried to future proof with the best of intentions, but it would appear the goal posts are moving, again.

Trying to plan ahead is impossible. Every day I read horror stories of insulation gone wrong – even for government-backed schemes. For now, as much as it pains me, I’ve decided the best course of action is to do nothing.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/property/buy-to-let/spent-thousands-future-proofing-property-done-nothing-epc/

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/Y8ipZET

November 8, 2024 at 03:47AM

UN COP 29 puts crazy money up front

UN Climate COPs have always been about big money but until now there was a facade of emission reductions to hide it behind.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/5Lbc01H

November 8, 2024 at 03:19AM

WILL THE CLIMATE IDEOLOGY SURVIVE A NEW TRUMP TERM?

 In 2017 President Trump announced the US would pull out of the Paris climate agreement, the most important UN process to tackle climate change. The agreement saw almost all the world’s nations – for the first time – agree to cut the greenhouse gas emissions which cause global warming.

But the shock of Trump’s decision was limited. The treaty’s rules meant the US was not able to withdraw until November 2020, a few months before he left office.

If Trump withdraws again, he will only have to wait a year before the US is completely out. That would give him three years to chart his own course without any need to report to the UN or be bound by its rules.

While President Joe Biden’s negotiators will be at next week’s COP talks in Azerbaijan, nothing they agree to will be binding for the Trump administration. 

So, if Trump cuts of funding and simply ignores the UN it will be interesting to see what happens.

via climate science

https://ift.tt/cRrW8NC

November 8, 2024 at 01:57AM