By Paul Homewood
The Met Office says our weather is becoming more extreme:
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
October 15, 2024 at 05:26AM
By Paul Homewood
The Met Office says our weather is becoming more extreme:
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
October 15, 2024 at 05:26AM
Affordable, reliable, continuous, and emissions free electricity would benefit billions on this planet.
Ronald Stein, P.E. is an engineer, columnist on energy literacy at America Out Loud NEWS, and advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute and CFACT, and co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations.”
.
Oliver Hemmers has a Doctorate in Physics from the Institute of Radiation and Nuclear Physics at the Technical University of Berlin, Germany. He was a Researcher in Physics, the Executive Director of UNLV’s Harry Reid Center and C- level executive.
.
Steve Curtis has a Master’s degree in Health Physics from UNLV. He has spent decades studying spent fuel issues in Nevada and worked as a technical field team leader for nuclear search and characterization missions for the Department of Energy. He is currently engaged in education, speaking, and writing in favor of nuclear power returning to the United States, especially from recycling spent nuclear fuel in fast reactors.
Co-authored by Ronald Stein, Oliver Hemmers, andSteve Curtis
Published October 14, 2024, in America Out Loud NEWS
Delivery of affordable, abundant, reliable, available, and clean, electricity to customers is paramount to modern quality of life. Recent announcements of the proliferation of data centers demanding double, and even triple the electricity supply will stress the current infrastructure. It’s time to stimulate conversations about unlimited electricity generation that is reliable, continuous, uninterruptable, and emissions free, to meet the needs of the end users.
Supplying such growth in demand for electricity is threatened by a vulnerable grid and the intermittency of low-density wind and solar electricity generation methods. The proven technology of nuclear power production is our only practical hope to keep up with the rapidly approaching demand.
Nuclear power has been providing electricity to the US Navy, France, and others around the world for almost 70 years. The technology is well-understood, and it boasts the best safety record of any industry (based on injury and death). The material left over from the current fleet of light-water reactors can be recycled to attain 30 times the electricity produced in the first time through. Such an advantage can provide energy security for billions around the world, greatly increase their quality of life, and relieve the fear of not having reliable and continuous electricity for all.
The Department of Energy’s (DOE) continues to advocate nuclear power to provide dispatchable electricity at the lowest cost for consumers.
The recent September 2024 report from the DOE, “The Pathways to Commercial Liftoff report” summarizes advanced nuclear that includes a range of proven and innovative technologies, and defines three size categories (large, small, and micro) for reactor designs:
Nuclear generated electricity is proliferating around the world:
Filmmaker Oliver Stone released a movie called Nuclear Now. The movie is educational and entertaining. Oliver Stone points out several additional reasons for Nuclear Now:
Nuclear power currently produces the least expensive electricity available today, considering that folks pay extra taxes in subsidies for coal and natural gas electricity production and as much as 100 times more subsidies for wind and solar power than we do in subsidies for nuclear power.
Rather than pursue renewables of wind and solar that require huge land footprints, huge taxpayer subsidies, and even then, only generate electricity occasionally, we must focus technology resources on our nuclear power production industry that has the best industrial safety record among all companies and a track record of producing the cheapest non-subsidized zero-emissions electricity.
Our government has struggled for almost 45 years to fulfill their responsibility to “dispose” of our “nuclear waste”. Since this “waste” can be recycled, it is a valuable asset, so let’s call it slightly used nuclear fuel (SUNF) since only about 3% of the electricity potential is realized from this fuel. We are on the cusp of a revolutionary innovation in electricity production, held back only by our Federal Government.
The recycling technology is called “fast reactor recycling”, or “fast breeder reactors”. Surprisingly, this technology has been around since before the current light water reactor technology existed. It has worked well, has produced extremely low-cost electricity, and promises even better safety features than the existing fleet.
Meanwhile, despite the DOE’s continuous support of the movement toward nuclear, the United States remains delighted to keep its head in the sand while France and other countries use nuclear generated electricity that is reliable, dispatchable, and zero-emission. The USA seems focused on wind and solar generated electricity that is the most expensive (without subsidies), unreliable, and NON-dispatchable! It also requires new expensive transmission lines at additional costs to the ratepayers.
A “New Nuclear Posture” for the US, via recycling Fast Breeder reactors for large demands and SMRs, that offer competition to lower costs, for smaller demands, offers electricity that is emissions free, continuous, and uninterruptible. This seems to be more practical than ever before to enhance the quality of life of more than 6 billion on this planet in developing countries, as well as for reliable power for military remote sites around the world and various power hungry industries. If the US will not take the lead, our adversaries will.
Please share this information with teachers, students, and friends to encourage Energy Literacy conversations at the family dinner table.
Click this Link to Sign up for Energy Literacy from Ronald Stein
via Watts Up With That?
October 15, 2024 at 04:07AM

Researchers find a ‘statistically steady rate’ of warming, which on the face of it wouldn’t rule out natural variation. They say ‘the magnitude of the acceleration is either statistically too small, or there isn’t enough data yet to robustly detect it’. Not what promoters of an urgent climate crisis would want to hear in the run-up to COP29.
– – –
Given the number of record-setting heat waves around the world in recent years, an international team of researchers, including a Lancaster University statistician, investigated if the rate of global warming has increased significantly, or “surged,” over the last half century at statistically detectable rates, says Phys.org.
The new study, published on October 14 in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, and led by scientists at UC Santa Cruz in the U.S., confirms the broad consensus that the planet is getting warmer, but at a statistically steady rate—not at a sufficiently accelerated rate that could be statistically defined as a surge.
Recent years have seen record-breaking temperatures and heat waves globally: Data show 2023 was the warmest year since global records began in 1850—by a wide margin—and that the 10 warmest years in the historical record have all occurred in the past decade (2014–2023).
Global average surface temperature, by NOAA
These record temperatures have spurred discussion and debate about whether the rate of global warming has increased, with some arguing that it has accelerated over the past 15 years. However, the team’s findings demonstrate a lack of statistical evidence for an increased warming rate that could be defined as a surge.
“We’ve had these record-breaking temperatures recently. But that’s not necessarily inconsistent with steadily increasing global warming,” said lead author Claudie Beaulieu, Professor of ocean sciences at UC Santa Cruz. [Talkshop comment – historical data is limited].
“Of course, it is still possible that an acceleration in global warming is occurring. But we found that the magnitude of the acceleration is either statistically too small, or there isn’t enough data yet to robustly detect it.”
. . .
The research team performed a rigorous analysis of sets of global surface-temperature averages from the four main agencies that track the average temperature of Earth’s surface, including NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA)—dating back to 1850.
Since that year, Earth’s temperature has risen by 0.11-degree Fahrenheit per decade, according to NOAA.
Full article here.
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
October 15, 2024 at 03:53AM
By Paul Homewood
h/t Ian Magness
It’s good enough for Google, but not for Mad Miliband!
Google has struck a deal to buy the world’s first private mini-nuclear reactors, as technology companies race to secure power for their data centres.
The US search engine giant has ordered a fleet of small modular reactors (SMRs) from California’s Kairos Power, with each mini-nuke capable of generating 500 megawatts (MW) of low-carbon electricity.
California-based Kairos said its first commercial reactor will come online by 2030, with additional reactors operational by 2035.
Google’s decision to embrace nuclear comes as the expansion of AI increases the tech sector’s energy requirements.
Michael Terrell, senior director for energy and climate at Google, said: “The grid needs new electricity sources to support AI technologies that are powering major scientific advances, improving services for businesses and customers, and driving national competitiveness and economic growth.
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
October 15, 2024 at 03:53AM