Blackouts Surge: How Fragile Grids Threaten Global Energy Security

Why Blackouts are no longer rare events…and how this effects energy security

Lars Schernikau: Energy Economist, Commodity Trader, Author (recent book “The Unpopular Truth… about Electricity and the Future of Energy”)

Details inc Blog at www.unpopular-truth.com

On April 28, 2025, the lights went out across Spain and Portugal, and just four days later, the island of Bali was wrapped into darkness.

In both cases, it happened in seconds. No war. No cyberattack. No act of nature. Just the hard truth of how today’s energy systems can wobble and break!

But let´s be honest… what happened in Spain, Portugal, and Bali isn’t just their problem. It’s our preview… a warning.

Power outages used to be rare, localized, and manageable. But not anymore. What happened in Spain, Portugal, and Bali in April 2025 was caused by fragile systems operating under idealistic assumptions.

In this article, I unpack what really triggered these cascading failures, what they reveal about the state of our energy infrastructure, and why grid reliability should now be considered a global security issue and not just a technical one.

Are we making the grid is becoming more fragile…

Our daily lives depend on a constant, hum of electricity, which is what keeps our cities moving, data flowing, phones ringing and healthcare running. But the grid that delivers it, was not built for what we are now throwing at it now.

Worldwide, we are adding more solar, wind, and complex transmission and network integration than ever before, while removing the coal, gas, and nuclear plants that gave us the resilience we are used to when it comes to our energy systems. The result? A grid that’s becoming a lot more fragile and less reliable.

Spain’s blackout was a textbook case. Just 15% of its generation came from dispatchable, rotating-mass sources like gas and nuclear which is the backbone of a stable AC grid. The rest, came from inverter-based energy generation from solar and wind. When two large solar plants tripped offline, it set off a chain reaction. The system began to oscillate as inertia disappeared and in just five seconds, the system collapsed.

Officially, “only” 60% of demand was lost. But in reality, almost the entire country went dark.

It’s not just the lack of sunshine…it’s the inverters

This isn’t about whether wind and solar are “good” or “bad” but rather about what happens when we ignore physics.

Wind and solar energy need inverters to be fed into the grid. Unlike traditional generators, these inverters don’t provide inertia or sufficient short-circuit strength… it worse, because they introduce electrical “noise” that can interfere with the grid’s waveform. As more inverters pile in, the risk of desynchronization increases.

It’s akin to an orchestra without a conductor attempting to perform a symphony by ear, inside a large shed with a tin roof, during a thunderstorm. The performance is bound to start off poorly, and a complete breakdown is inevitable.

A quick run-down…Grid-following inverters chase the existing frequency, but can’t lead. Grid-forming inverters try to lead but only work well in isolated systems, not big interconnected ones. Batteries? In theory, yes but in practice, there is no proven large-scale success thus far.

Spain, Bali, Chile, Ukraine, Texas, Bangladesh…

What happened in Spain and Bali isn’t isolated. It’s just recent.

Chile also saw a massive blackout in 2025 and Ukraine’s grid was targeted by hackers…twice! Bangladesh, Pakistan, Argentina, and India have all experienced nationwide Blackouts in the last decade. In Texas in 2021, millions froze in the dark when cold weather crushed an overconfident system.

Yes, the causes of these Blackouts vary: cyberattacks, system design flaws, underinvestment, political choices, extreme weather. But for now, let’s address the false assumption that “clean” automatically means “stable” energy. Read more on my blog

The bigger picture: Security, Reliability, Reality

We need to be honest with ourselves… wind and solar alone can’t provide energy security. Not today. Maybe not ever without massive redesigns.

We have leaned too hard on brittle inverter-based systems and we’ve treated energy like a lifestyle choice instead of the critical infrastructure support it is.

The path forward should be an energy mix, designed with eyes open.

  • invest in dispatchable, weather-independent generation (yes, that includes gas, coal, and nuclear)
  • consider reserve margins that reflect real risk, not best-case scenarios
  • plan for blackouts…because they are most likely coming
  • recognize that physics does not negotiate…either the system works, or it doesn’t

What now?

I was asked recently: “What can we do?”

Here my simple advice:

  • Personally: Prepare for 3-5 days by stocking up on water, food, light, power backups. No one’s coming to save you in hour one
  • Professionally: Push for systems thinking rather than designing for optics. Start designing systems that supply us with stable, affordable energy simultaneously protecting the environment
  • Politically: Demand realistic energy policy and not slogans

Let’s start envisioning the grid of the future designed to grow with our energy needs.

Read my full blog post – Blackouts, what causes them? share it if it makes sense, push back if you disagree…but don’t ignore it. 😉


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/eT9tYHy

May 28, 2025 at 08:07AM

Deadliest US Tornado Days

The deadliest part of the tornado season in the US is from March 15 to June 11 The United State’s Worst Tornadoes

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/U3km0CS

May 28, 2025 at 07:24AM

Dunbarney, South Hill DCNN 1473 – The new “2 metre rule” and a case of hidden identity.

56.34410 -3.4410 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 5 Temperature records from 15/7/2014

The Surface Stations Project is intended to assess the quality and data representation of each and every of the approximately 380 to 390 UK Met Office weather stations. I apologise if at times these reports may get tedious or boringly repetitive but unfortunately so many Met Office stations (87%) are sub standard and a ridiculously large proportion are in completely inappropriate amateur back gardens sites. Dunbarney, South Hill is another of these domestic sites that is so bad it almost appears the Met Office are actually trying to disown it.

Unsurprisingly this site is rated Class 5 and thus completely unregulated. As an important point to note on this, in 2022 I queried with the BBC some claims (by their “Verify” journalist Marco Silva) of record breaking sites in Italy meeting WMO standards. I referred them to the CIMO regulations indicating that Class 5 has no regulation and simply indicates not meeting Class 4. They declined to comment and simply suggested I take my “issue” up with the WMO – so much for responsibility in reporting. The takeaway from all this being that the general public are simply led to assume “official” government agency sites will be of a good quality – an appeal to authority of sorts – when in fact the vast majority of them are very poor indeed. Dunbarney, South Hill ranks as terrible.

The above image shows the outer 30 metres radius circle moving inwards to 10 metres and then just 3 metres (10 feet). The innermost circle indicates the entirety of the screen is in very deep shade despite the shadows not being long and, in running northward, indicating a midday image. Hedging runs to the north, east and south close to the screen with extensive shrubs and trees west with the house and large tarmac driveway to the west and north west. The 2018 image below offers greater clarity.

Given that the CIMO regulations were fully in force when this site was originally installed in 2014 (it does not appear in historical imagery before then thus it is not an “adopted” existing site) why would the Met Office add such a compromised site? What benefit can this site offer other than almost certainly inaccurate readings and unquestionably elevated night time minima distorting averages? Perhaps the embarrassment of such a site becoming known led them to quietly almost ignore it.

“we don’t have any climate stations at or nearby that location” Really? Oh yes you do!

Putting in the suggested alternative option of a postcode (for ease of finding I used the one for the local primary school ) brought back to life the local zombie.

Perth weather station 3 miles away originally passed away on the 31/12/1979, almost 45 years ago. I am still awaiting answers to my contesting the Met Office’s refusal to supply the details of which current stations provide readings to contrive climate averages for such undead weather stations like Perth. I suspect their reticence in disclosure is because they will have to admit they are using readings from the likes of Dunbarney to homogenise with those around in their contrived melting pot. The result of that probability being that even Class 1 and 2 good sites’ readings would be knowingly (deliberately?) contaminated with data from completely unregulated back garden dross. I am advised answers from an “independent” review are due by 10/6/2025 whereupon I shall advise of their, if any, response.

So where does my cryptic headline about the new, post Covid, 2 metre rule come from? Well, despite numerous weather stations being covertly relocated over large distances (without the Met Office disclosing the point and seamlessly bonding two different data sets together examples being Cambridge NIAB, Stornoway, Braemar and lots of others) this Dunbarney site has been shown to very recntly be relocated.

The Met Office dutifully recorded that the screen was moved just 2 metres to get it away from that pesky bush casting its shade at midday. As a result this will have changed the CIMO Classification from an unregulated Class 5 to an equally unregulated Class 5……no significant improvement at all.

In summary, and for brevity, the Dunbarney, South Hill is……junk.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/qAwbs6x

May 28, 2025 at 07:01AM

The Other Side Of The Pond

Sea surface temperatures are well below normal in the western North Atlantic, but the BBC says warm temperatures around the UK are due to the burning of fossil fuels. “Climate change is causing oceans to warm around the globe and … Continue reading

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/N5BdpZX

May 28, 2025 at 05:28AM