Duane Gubler On Dengue Fever

By Paul Homewood

 

 Further to my post on the West Nile virus the other day, it is worth reading Prof Duane Gubler’s analysis of mosquito borne diseases a few years ago.

Prof Gubler is arguably the world’s leading expert on the subject:

 

image

Extract

Yellow fever virus and its mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti, both of African origin, were introduced to the Western hemisphere in the 1600s by the slave trade, causing major epidemics of yellow fever that killed thousands of people in that region over a period of three and a half centuries.1 Through a combination of disciplined public health practices, effective mosquito control and vaccination, yellow fever and other major vector-borne diseases were effectively controlled in the 1950s and1960s, introducing a period of complacency and apathy that led some public health officials to declare the war on infectious diseases won.2

However, coincident with this complacent and optimistic post WWII period, several global trends were initiated, including unprecedented economic expansion, population growth, urbanization and development of new technology, which created ideal demographic, sociologic, epidemiologic and ecologic conditions for the re-emergence of epidemic infectious diseases. The new jet air transportation system, which began to expand in the 1970s, provided the ideal mechanism to transport pathogens causing those diseases to new geographic areas.2,3 The increasingly frequent infectious disease epidemics and pandemics in the past few decades, especially arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika and chikungunya that are also transmitted by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in tropical urban cities, have alerted public health authorities to the potential spread once again of the dreaded yellow fever virus.

https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article-abstract/25/1/tay097/5123947

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/tThEbuN

May 26, 2025 at 08:58AM

Big Pharma Sales Tool

There was a huge spike in COVID “cases” in New York City during December 2021, but little change in the death count. PCR tests were apparently a vaccine sales tool. COVID-19 Daily Counts of Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths – Catalog

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/ZQ9veB7

May 26, 2025 at 08:52AM

Carney Brings Eco-Tyranny to Canada

Issues and Insights Editorial Board warns of Carney’s history of climate diktats in their I & I article Eco-Stalinism in Canada.  Excerpts in italics with my bolds and added images.

Leftist Prime Minister Mark Carney might not be as prissy and preposterous as his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, but he is just as tyrannical. He’s told Canadian companies that there will be penalties for those that don’t conduct business in the way he wants them to. We don’t think he’s building gulags in Nunavut for refusenik executives, but we see the hammer and sickle he’s trying to hide behind his back.

Before he was prime minister, Carney claimed that “climate change is an existential threat” and “we all recognize that,” both of which are untrue, but that’s the way authoritarians operate – the only “truth” or “pravda” is whatever they say it is.

He went on to say that “if you’re taking steps, making investments, coming up with new technologies, changing the way you do business, all in service of reducing and eliminating that threat, you’re creating value” and “are part of the solution.” These companies, Carney promises, will be rewarded for their obedience to the central planners.

But woe be unto those “who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem,” because they will be punished.”

Carney has a history of threatening punishment for companies that don’t conduct business in accordance with his wishes. An October 2019 Manchester Guardian article listed a number of occasions in which he warned that businesses falling behind in the pursuit of net zero emissions “will be punished” and those “that don’t adapt” to the framework laid down by the climate bosses “will go bankrupt without question.”

“Carney has led efforts to address the dangers global heating poses to the financial sector, from increasing extreme weather disasters to a potential fall in asset values such as fossil fuel company valuations as government regulations bite,” said the Guardian.

Mark Carney, former Co-Chair of GFANZ (Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero), accompanied by (from left) Ravi Menon, Loh Boon Chye, and Yuki Yasui, at the Singapore Exchange, for the GFANZ announcement on the formation of its Asia-Pacific (APAC) Network

Carney’s threat of punishment is not the possibility of imprisonment but rather the punishment of investors who will move their capital elsewhere. This happens every day, of course. Investors penalize companies that underperform and mismanage by withholding their capital.

But Carbon Tax Carney‘s menace is backed by the power of the government, and it’s not materially different from the tactics used by Barack Obama, who promised before being elected president that he would use policy to bankrupt coal companies.

Obama’s plan was to charge “a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.” Apparently the punishment worked. The coal sector lost more than 49,000 jobs between 2008 and 2012, in part due to “increased regulatory initiatives by the Obama administration,” the Washington Post reported.

Obama’s policies not only “contributed to massive job losses in coal country,” says the Heartland Institute’s Sterling Burnett, but also to “the premature shuttering of vital coal-fired power plants.” They “were a factor in profitable coal companies being forced to file for bankruptcy.” 

After almost a decade of Trudeau, Canadians put another climate crusader at the head of their government rather than Pipeline Pierre Poilievere. Carney won’t save the world, because there is no global warming threat, but he now has the power to put companies out of business if they don’t follow the party line.

Canada becomes less glorious and free almost daily.

 

via Science Matters

https://ift.tt/pCDqHwa

May 26, 2025 at 08:43AM

BP May Cancel Teesside Hydrogen Project

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Philip Bratby

The Telegraph is reporting that BP may pull out of its hydrogen project on Teesside:

A massive hydrogen project at the heart of Ed Miliband’s net zero plans risks being cancelled as BP retreats from green targets.

The H2Teesside scheme, announced in 2021 by the company’s then chief executive Bernard Looney, was designed to produce “blue” hydrogen from natural gas, and then capture and store the carbon emissions.

It had been slated to deliver more than 10pc of the 2030 target set by Mr Miliband, the Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary, for hydrogen production and was expected to come online by the late 2020s.

But sources have warned that BP is now likely to scale back or even cancel the 1.2 gigawatt project as it struggles to secure enough customers to make the investment worthwhile.

The FTSE 100 company is currently in talks with the Government about whether greater state support can be provided, with Mr Miliband’s department viewing the scheme as a potentially important source of hydrogen for both industrial uses and power plants.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/25/ed-milibands-net-zero-targets-threatened-by-bp-retreat/

Apparently one of the major issues is the potential closure of the nearby Sabic chemical plant, which it was hoped would buy a lot of the BP hydrogen.

The Saudi’s who own Sabic may close their plant because of high energy costs. It is not without irony that any hydrogen they ended up buying would be much more expensive than the natural gas they currently use!

This is all in stark contrast to the green fanfare when BP originally announced the project back in 2021, which the Telegraph covered here. Hydrogen apparently was going to be our saviour in the battle against global warming.

That was in the days of Bernard Looney, who had fallen for the green agenda hook, line and sinker.

Now BP’s new team have returned to realityville, and have come to the conclusion that nobody wants to replace fossil fuels with something much more expensive.

If governments want it, let them pay for it is now the policy.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/lUYBKmG

May 26, 2025 at 08:07AM