Monday

10 out of 10 based on 1 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/KCEz9FN

April 20, 2025 at 10:08AM

Hawaii Democrats Cook Up Another Climate Lawfare Scheme

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Nick Pope
Contributor

Hawaii Democrats have advanced a bill that would clear the way for individuals and insurers adversely affected by an “event attributable to climate change” to sue companies and other entities for spreading climate “misinformation.”

S.B. 1166, introduced by Democratic Hawaii State Sen. Chris Lee, aims to “provide a new, specific cause of action for any person other than an officer or employee of a state or local governmental entity” and insurers to file suit against companies or other entities that supposedly misinformed the public about the nature of climate change. Lee introduced the bill on Jan. 17, and it is currently in the hands of the Hawaii House, according to LegiScan. (RELATED: Hawaii Supreme Court Claims ‘The Spirit Of Aloha’ Overrules The Second Amendment)

During his visit to Maui, Biden says he has ‘a little sense of what it’s like to lose a home’ describing when lightning struck his home, which resulted in a small kitchen fire. He jokes about how he almost lost his ’67 Corvette as he talks to survivors of the devastating Maui… pic.twitter.com/xXUnC3kuHz

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 22, 2023

“The legislature finds that for decades, certain people and entities have spread intentional lies, misinformation and disinformation, and misrepresentations about the connection between climate change and fossil fuel products, as well as how climate change has caused injuries in the State,” the bill’s text reads. “Continued lies, misinformation and disinformation, and misrepresentations by responsible parties pose a threat to the health, safety, and security of Hawaii’s residents and visitors. These parties have long known the dangers of fossil fuel products; however, they have continued to deny and lie for profit … Hawaii has a compelling interest in protecting consumers from lies and misleading information, while also encouraging factual and truthful information on how climate disasters and other harms can be attributed to the responsible parties who have spread falsehoods.”

“These parties have long known the dangers of fossil fuel products; however, they have continued to deny and lie for profit … Hawaii has a compelling interest in protecting consumers from lies and misleading information, while also encouraging factual and truthful information on how climate disasters and other harms can be attributed to the responsible parties who have spread falsehoods,” the bill’s text states.

The amended bill text specifically defines “responsible parties” to include any “firm, corporation, company, partnership, society, joint stock company, or any other entity or association that engaged in misleading and deceptive practices, including lies, or the provision of misinformation or disinformation about the connection between its fossil fuel products and climate change and extreme weather or other events attributable to climate change.” Notably, tribal, state and federal government entities are excluded from the definition.

The bill text specifically cites the Maui fires of August 2023 as an example of a catastrophic event exacerbated by climate change. The fires killed 102 people and caused billions of dollars of damage.

While the bill and many Democrats — including Hawaii Gov. Josh Green — were quick to point the finger at climate change for making the fires worse, multiple instances of human error and official incompetence may have actually turned the fires into a full-scale disaster. Examples of critical mistakes and shortcomings include, but are not limited to, inadequate vegetation management, regulatory sluggishness, fire hydrants running dry, delayed emergency siren activation and a failure by a state agency to promptly divert water that was needed to fight the burgeoning fires.

The bill’s current text specifies that prospective plaintiffs are only permitted to sue under its provisions if they have suffered damages of $10,000 or more due to a “climate disaster or extreme weather or other event attributable to climate change.”

Notably, President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier in April instructing his administration to determine the legality of subnational government efforts to impose “burdensome and ideologically motivated ‘climate change’ or energy policies that threaten American energy dominance” via legislation or lawsuits. The executive order further instructs the administration to produce actionable options for defanging those policies and lawsuits, most of which are coming from blue states or Democrat-controlled jurisdictions, including from the Hawaiian capital city of Honolulu.

Lee’s office did not respond to a request for comment and a voicemail message.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/BetHY4J

April 20, 2025 at 08:02AM

Trump halts Long Island wind project

Watch Craig Rucker on the Matt Gaetz Show.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/Bvcxb0K

April 20, 2025 at 07:53AM

Tibbenham Airfield WMO03931 – Modern Met Office misinterpretation.

52.45662 1.16246 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 2 Installed 12/2/2015

The Commission for Instrumentation and Meteorological Observations (CIMO) together with the International Standards Organisation published the regulatory standards for weather station site standards in 2014. There have been very many UK weather stations installed after that date, very many are of a low rated poor standard. In many cases I find the Met office’s assessment puzzling with some surprisingly marked better though many seem harshly marked down. Tibbenham airfield is assessed Class 2 which I regard as somewhat optimistic for the reasons below.

Firstly below I have marked the 10 metre and 30 metre radius annuli from the screen. The vehicles to the west (right) are caravans and historic images show various comings and goings within 30 metres over recent years. The Met office seems to overlook these transient effects even to the extent demonstrated at East Malling where medium term buildings severely compromise the site.

What I do not understand even more though, is their ignoring the twin lines of hedges to both the east and west creating an almost north/south corridor. As well as affecting winds from the sides these will unquestionably act as both wind breaks and funnels variable with wind direction. The easterly of the two hedges is shown below and is high enough to obscure the screen from sight.

Norfolk Gliding Club have their own webcam offering live views of their facilities. I captured the still below showing the eastern hedge, caravans, glider trailers, cars, western hedge and hard standing areas.

Historic images from just prior to the weather station indicate the eastern hedge is actually a recent planting at the same time as the site installation presumably to delineate the airfield site. However this also indicates that the Met Office would have known about this at the outset rather similar to Culzean Castle , Albemarle and too many others. They really should have considered the longer term effects – or perhaps they did.

In summary I do not consider it reasonable to consider this Tibenham site a fully representative site for the wider area and Class 2 is not appropriate. The typical Met Office standard of Class 4 is much more appropriate. That the modern day Met Office in full knowledge of the CIMO requirements for climate reporting stations chose to install another lower standard unit that will only deteriorate over time due to the almost inevitable neglect of the hedges is a poor reflection on their standards.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/qZ5F0Pe

April 20, 2025 at 06:28AM