The Great Mauna Loa Meltdown: NOAA’s Hilo Office Faces the Chop, and the Sky Is Falling (Apparently)

Oh, the humanity! The New York Times has unearthed a scandal of apocalyptic proportions: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) might shutter its office in Hilo, Hawaii, which oversees the Mauna Loa Observatory. Yes, that Mauna Loa—the one with the fancy Keeling Curve that’s been tracking carbon dioxide like a stalker since 1958. According to the Times’ breathless prose, this could spell doom for “global scientific research.” Cue the violins.

The story, scraped from an internal federal document like it’s some kind of Wikileaks drop, warns that the Hilo office could close as early as August. Why? Because Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has proposed slashing 793 federal leases to save a measly $500 million. That’s less than 0.1% of the 2025 defense budget, the article tut-tuts, as if every penny of government bloat is a sacred cow. Never mind that these offices might be ghost towns, abandoned by remote-working bureaucrats who’d rather Zoom from their lanais than clock in. Nope, it’s a crisis, because reasons.

The Times wrings its hands over the observatory’s fate, but here’s the kicker: there’s zero evidence Mauna Loa’s CO2 monitors will stop humming. No one’s saying the instruments get unplugged—just that the Hilo office, one of 30 NOAA buildings on DOGE’s hit list, might not be needed. Maybe the data can be managed from, say, a server in Colorado? Or a laptop in someone’s basement? But no, we’re told this is a “pole star of global scientific research,” and without that Hilo lease, the planet’s “eyes” will be gouged out. Ralph Keeling, son of the curve’s namesake, calls it “vital baseline data.” Sure, Ralph, but vital to what? Endless climate conferences and glossy charts?

The article’s real spice comes from its cast of disgruntled ex-NOAA folks. Janet Coit, former assistant administrator of NOAA Fisheries, frets that if leases end, staff might not know “whether they have an office or access to essential equipment.” More likely these offices have been empty for years as employees “worked” remotely, with some likely working a second job.

Meanwhile, John Bateman, a NOAA meteorologist, laments the end of monthly climate briefings due to staff cuts—1,300 gone, 1,000 more to go. Sounds like a leaner operation, but to hear the Times tell it, it’s the end of civilization. Who will churn out those precipitation reports we all pore over at breakfast?

And then there’s the White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, who delivers the story’s best zinger. Asked to comment, she fires back:

“As a matter of policy, we do not respond to reporters with pronouns in their bios.”

Burn. The Times, of course, plays it straight, but you can almost hear the reporter’s keyboard clattering in indignation. Pronouns or not, the lack of a juicy quote leaves the piece leaning hard on innuendo—extrapolating from a spreadsheet to a full-blown climate science Armageddon.

Naturally, the article can’t resist the obligatory climate change sermon. That rising Keeling Curve? It’s “warmed the atmosphere,” causing “more frequent and intense extreme weather events like heat waves, floods, and wildfires.” No data, no attribution studies—just vibes. Never mind that linking CO2 to specific storms is a game of statistical Twister even the IPCC plays coy about. But why let facts spoil a good narrative?

So here we are: a tale of a Hawaiian office facing the axe, spun into a dirge for “climate science”—that noble pursuit some might call taxpayer-funded navel-gazing. The Times wants you to believe every lease termination is a dagger to the heart of progress, every cut a betrayal of the planet. Yet the observatory’s still running, the curve’s still curving, and the only thing truly threatened seems to be the egos of a few ex-employees. Maybe DOGE’s onto something—trim the fat, keep the data. Or maybe it’s all just a plot to make us miss the next PowerPoint on South Sudan’s heat waves. Either way, the sky’s not falling. It’s just a little less cluttered with rent checks.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/JgWR0Vk

March 15, 2025 at 12:07PM

Benson WMO 03658 – Conflicting claims and close comparisons.

51.62027 -1.09867 Met Office CIMO assessed Class 2 Installed 1/1/1951

RAF Benson is one of the Met Office’s best weather stations. It is currently rated as Class 2 though until recently it was Class 1. When Tim Channon made his original brief report he estimated Class 1 and I am rather surprised the Met Office have since marked this site down. Tim went on to supply a more extensive technical review on diurnal radiation that focused on Benson which I recommend reading for further background.

https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/diurnal-radiation-three-uk-sites-compared/

The headline image includes a 100 metre radius encircled area. There is very little hard standing at all within the area. Aviation there is now almost entirely helicopters and the runways and taxiways are distant from the screen. The grass is impeccably well kept as it so often is at military sites. Readings from this site should be reliable, however, they are frequently played down by many meteorologists with suggestions that they are unrepresentative of the wider environment. This implication of inaccuracy due to siting runs directly opposite to its CIMO rating and warranted investigation.

The text from the Channel 4 TV weatherman and meteorologist Liam Dutton reads –

“The well known frost hollow, Benson in Oxfordshire, is already down to -8.7C at 5pm. A frost hollow is a dip in the topography where cold, dense air sinks, making it markedly colder and more frost-prone than surrounding areas.”

This somewhat intrigued me, 6,000 feet long runways are not usually in a “dip in the topography.” Others puzzlingly seemed to agree with Liam’s opinion. The Met Office themselves acknowledge the low CIMO classification (i.e. 1 or 2 ) means Benson represents a wide area and their own specifications specifically declare such frost hollow sites as “undesirable” as below.

A second opinion of what constitutes a “frost hollow” was in order. This article contained a good description with case studies.

Looking at the Ordnance Survey sheet of the Benson area does not specifically reveal any particular “dip” The screen is at a noted elevation of 57 metres amsl and the airfield is especially flat as would be expected, in fact the exact site is possibly at the high point rather than any dip. Perhaps the most important point is that there is also a Met Office site at Wallingford just 2,150 metres distant (all downhill) which at 47 metres amsl is 10 metres/33 feet lower by the Thames………and coincidentally the same altitude as the village of Benson noted for parts of it being in a frost hollow.

Is the airfield flat site some distance and elevation away from the village being tarred with the same brush whilst Wallingford is seemingly not? I am not a meteorologist and would welcome any further advice from qualified readers. Personally though I find it hard to accept that the Benson screen location is in some way adversely affected by any very localised effect. What I can see is a site in reasonably open countryside that is not subject to any artificial or anthropogenic effects and is probably reading correctly in a manner representative of the natural wider area.

The relevance is that there have been many sites similar to RAF Benson closed over recent decades. Even since Tim did his epic review of all synoptic stations in double quick time in 2012, it is noticeable that many he reviewed are no longer operational. The replacement sites over the intervening years have a worrying habit of being of much lower classifications than their predecessors. Is this another example of “site selection” slewing climate averages?

More topically I recently reviewed a not dissimilar setting not far away at South Newington recording “cooler” and referenced Benson also showing a lower temperature. Then yesterday 14/3/2025 this happened.

Is RAF Benson really an unnaturally cool site or is it simply one of the better ones recording the reality of inland England away from large urbanisation effects?

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/xrbX0lg

March 15, 2025 at 09:37AM

Sunday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/VrofAni

March 15, 2025 at 09:25AM

EPA questions 31 major energy regulations

What is certain is that 31 big fights lie ahead making this EPA combined action a truly breathtaking event.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/fnW4euO

March 15, 2025 at 09:23AM