New York Times Fact Checks The New York Times

In January, the New York Times said California was at risk from huge fires, because of forest mismanagement.

Mark A. Finney, an expert in fire behavior for the U.S. Forest Service and an author of the study, says California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation.

How might the dead-tree forests affect California? One of the most striking concerns is the damage the fires might do to watersheds. Intense, hot-burning fires could disrupt forests’ ability to channel water into the Sierra reservoirs that provide cities like San Francisco with drinking water. That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.

California Today: 100 Million Dead Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires – The New York Times

President Trump agreed with them.

The New York Times then fact checked the claim, and said that it isn’t true. Apparently facts change as needed to suit the latest fake news cycle.

Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’ – The New York Times

h/t Cole Matthews

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

https://ift.tt/2P9bWNm

November 28, 2018 at 09:18PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: