BBC Retract Fake IPPR Extreme Weather Claims

By Paul Homewood


The BBC have been forced to retract their fake claims about extreme weather.


Politicians and policymakers have failed to grasp the gravity of the environmental crisis facing the Earth, a report claims.

The think-tank IPPR says human impacts have reached a critical stage and threaten to destabilise society and the global economy.

They say since 2005, the number of floods across the world has increased by 15 times, extreme temperature events by 20 times, and wildfires seven-fold.



Readers will recall the BBC’s naive coverage of that IPPR report last month, which claimed environmental breakdown was imminent, partly because of climate change.


As I pointed out at the time, the claim they trumpeted was a totally fake one, which merely reflected the fact that more disasters are reported now than in the past, rather than more actually occurring.

I therefore sent in a formal complaint to the BBC.

They first tried to fob me off:

Thank you for contacting us about the BBC News Website.

We understand you found the article entitled ‘Environment in multiple crises – report’ contains inaccurate information.

We appreciate your comments however as outlined in the article it is made clear that this information had come from the think-tank IPPR. The article gives context to the political leaning of the think thank as well as highlighting the research undertaken and the findings as well as reaction from numerous experts including Simon Lewis, Professor of Global Change Science at University College London and Harriet Bulkeley, a geography professor at Durham University as well as the government.

Overall we felt the findings of this report were in the public interest and editorially justified, we are careful to check and report the facts surrounding any debate, examine relevant arguments, and offer detailed analysis. We believe that by doing this our audience can then make up their own minds.

We always aim for due impartiality, and hear from all sides of a debate over time.


I refused to accept this, and strongly pointed out that Harrabin had a duty to challenge statements which were, at least, contestable.


The BBC have now folded, and accepted that the IPPR claim was totally incorrect.

In good Soviet fashion, the incorrect statement has now been removed from the website, and there is this rather meaningless correction added:



As is always the case, nobody will pay the slightest attention to the new version, and the lie has gone around the world and back in the meantime.

Nevertheless, GWPF, who have also written to complain, will insist on a formal entry being made on the BBC’s correction page. It is also good that Harrabin knows he cannot keep getting away with his incompetent, biased and dishonest coverage of these issues.

It is also encouraging that this particular exposure of the BBC has also attracted a fair deal of public attention, thanks to the help of Booker, Dellers, Kathy Gyngell and Matt Ridley’s piece in the Spectator.

I will be working to ensure that the BBC’s retraction will also get maximum publicity.


Finally, the public exposure has also resulted in the IPPR themselves being forced to make major changes to their own paper.

This will be worth a separate post tomorrow.


March 1, 2019 at 01:39PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: