By Paul Homewood
h/t Philip Bratby
Harrabin wants £14bn a year from taxpayers!
An extra £14bn is needed each year to help the UK meet its climate commitments, a new think tank report suggests.
Green Alliance says the cash is needed for clean transport, nature restoration, and low-carbon buildings.
Over the past three years, it says that £9bn has been spent on projects that actually increase CO2, like roads.
It comes as large UK firms make a promise to "kick-start a new approach" and "put the environment first".
The Green Alliance think tank insists though that the funding issue must be solved in the prime minister’s economic recovery speech expected on Tuesday.
Its calculations are based on the government’s own assessment of major projects in the pipeline released on 16 June.
The government said it is determined to meet carbon targets, but the report draws attention to ministers’ plans to spend £28bn on roads.
The authors cast doubt on whether the government should spend any more money at all on projects that increase CO2 emissions.
Chris Venables, head of politics at Green Alliance, said of Tuesday’s expected speech: "This is a once in a generation opportunity for the prime minister to create the foundations of a healthier, more resilient economy.
"For ‘Project Speed’ (the prime minister’s infrastructure review) to be successful, it must be the most ambitious climate infrastructure project ever, creating jobs in every corner of the UK.
"It can’t mean a bonfire of regulations locking in polluting activities for decades to come.”
The report supports analysis by the the Trades Union Congress defining the best value for money from job-creating schemes. Road-building was judged poorly.
The calculations judge projects based on jobs created per pound of public investment.
Harrabin repeats the old canard about”jobs”, claiming that road building gives poor value for money because it does not create “as many jobs”. Perhaps he would like to do away with the bulldozers and give workers a shovel each.
On the wider issue though, £14 billion equates to £500 for every household in the country. Maybe a bill should be sent to each and every home for that amount. I suspect most people would soon tell Harrabin and his chums where they can stick their green nonsense.
After all, regardless of what opinion polls say, I doubt whether most people would be bothered at all about clean transport, nature restoration, and low-carbon buildings, if they actually had to pay the bill.
So who are the Green Alliance, who published this report which Harrabin is so keen to uncritically publicise?
According to their website:
According to their Annual Accounts, they received £1.6 million in funding last year, and we can see the usual suspects, particularly amongst the larger donors:
In particular, the European Climate Foundation appears as the biggest donor. Time and time again, we find the ECF at the heart of the left wing, green agenda being foisted on the British public, ably assisted of course by the likes of Harrabin.
David Rose exposed the role of the ECF and other green lobbyists a few years ago:
The Mail on Sunday today exposes how a ‘Green Blob’ financed by a shadowy group of hugely wealthy foreign donors is driving Britain towards economically ruinous eco targets.
The phrase the ‘Green Blob’ was coined by former Environment Secretary Owen Paterson after he was sacked from the Cabinet in July.
He was referring to a network of pro-green lobbyists working at every level of the British Establishment, who have helped shape the eco policies sending household energy bills soaring.
But investigations by this newspaper reveal the Blob is not just an abstract concept.
We have found that innocuous-sounding bodies such as the Dutch National Postcode Lottery, the American William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Swiss Oak Foundation are channelling tens of millions of pounds each year to climate change lobbyists in Britain, including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth..…
At the heart of the Blob is a single institution – the European Climate Foundation (ECF) – which has offices in London, Brussels, The Hague, Berlin and Warsaw.
Every year it receives about £20 million from ‘philanthropic’ foundations in America, Holland and Switzerland, and channels most of it to green campaign and lobby groups.
It refuses to disclose how much it gives to each recipient, and does not publish its accounts. But it admits that the purpose of these grants is to influence British and EU climate and energy policy across a broad front.
Many more millions are fed directly to British and European lobby groups from the same overseas foundations which also fund ECF….
The most significant source for the ECF’s millions is a body called Climate Works – a private foundation which channels colossal sums to climate campaigners worldwide.
The Climate Works manifesto was set out in 2007 in a document entitled ‘Design to Win: Philanthropy’s Role in the Fight Against Global Warming’. It said that to be effective, a campaign to change government policies on energy and emissions would need at least $600 million from donors.
Climate Works soon achieved its ambitious fundraising target, with a grant in 2008 of $500 million from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, which spends the fortune amassed by the co-founder of the Hewlett-Packard computer firm. This was followed by further grants of up to $100 million, and donations of $60 million from the sister Packard foundation. In July, a report by a US Senate committee named the Hewlett foundation as a key element in a ‘billionaires’ club’ which effectively controlled the environmental movement, pumping more than half a billion dollars a year into green groups around the world.
It claimed these ‘wealthy liberals fully exploit the benefits of a generous tax code meant to promote genuine philanthropy and charitable acts’, but instead were transferring money to ‘activists’ to ‘promote shared political goals’.
One of the US-based Climate Works’s first acts was to set up and fund ECF as its European regional office. All ECF’s main funders are represented on ECF’s board, including Charlotte Pera, who is also Climate Works’s CEO. Susan Bell, ECF’s vice-chairman, was formerly the Hewlett foundation’s vice-president.
It is hard to assess the ECF’s full impact for a simple reason – although it publishes the names of some of the organisations it funds, it does not state how much it gives, nor exactly how this money is used.
Nevertheless, it is clear from the information that is available that the list of ECF funding recipients is a Who’s Who of the green movement, including Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, the WWF, Client Earth, Carbon Brief, the Green Alliance, and E3G, the elite lobby group that persuaded the Government to set up the £3 billion Green Investment Bank.
The 2013 ECF report sets out its priorities for Britain, praising its ‘leadership on the climate front’ – thanks to the Climate Change Act.
It also boasts that its grants had an impact on this year’s Energy Act: ‘ECF grantees such as Green Alliance, E3G, and Greenpeace helped secure important milestones such as an emissions performance standard for new power stations.’
As Rose noted, foundations who support the ECF, such as Esme Fairbairn and Tellus, also directly fund the Green Alliance, who also receive money from the likes of Greenpeace, FOE, Client Earth and WWF, who all also receive money from ECF. A money-go-round in other words!
Other supporters of the Green Alliance include Orsted (formerly DONG), who make a fortune in subsidies for wind power, and the murky Network for Social Change.
There is no doubt that this shadowy network is undermining UK democracy, in pursuit of its own objectives. It is shameful that the BBC should be facilitating this.
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
June 29, 2020 at 05:18AM