With the world’s wind turbines slicing and dicing thousands of eagles, owls, hawks, and kites every day, wind farms are more slaughterhouses than power generators.

Millions of tonnes of beneficial bugs get splattered annually, along with millions of birds and bats, some of them being among the last of their kind. At the apex of the avian carcass heap are the thousands of eagles, wiped out in the blink of an eye.

Cars, cats and skyscrapers don’t kill Eagles – like the critically endangered Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle, but 60m wind turbine blades with their tips travelling at 350Kph routinely smash them out of existence. Although, as this story from the Netherlands details, the victims often die a slow and horrible death.

White-tailed eagle, once again tagged in the Netherlands, killed by wind turbine
News Fox-24
Stef van Rijn, Dirk van Straalen and Ralph Buij
4 February 2022

In the early morning of January 31, 2022, the White-tailed Eagle flew from the sleeping tree on the edge of the Oostvaardersplassen into the nature reserve, probably to forage. After a short period of rest in the swamp, the bird left the area around 10:50 am in an easterly direction, crossed the A6 highway and navigated into the polder of Southern Flevoland. Immediately after crossing the A6, the bird ended up in a wind farm, along the Roerdomptocht between the Ibisweg and the Vogelweg. Just before 11 am, the animal was hit by the rotors of one of the turbines and landed in the field next to it.

The transmitter’s accelerometer showed that the bird was not immediately dead after the impact. The bird was still moving between 11 a.m. and 12 noon. After that, the sensor of the transmitter stopped detecting movement and the temperature dropped rapidly. During the discovery of the cadaver, on February 1, 2022, it was confirmed that the bird was still alive immediately after the collision. Both claws were filled with heavy clay, which indicates that the animal tried to keep itself upright for another hour.

First results mortality
In 2019, 2020 and 2021, fifteen young White-tailed Eagles in the Netherlands were equipped with GPS transmitters with the aim of obtaining knowledge about the dispersion and survival of birds from the Dutch breeding population. Three birds have since died; two as a result of collisions with wind turbines and one as a result of a collision with a train. That means that within a few years of birth, twenty percent died, in all cases attributable to unnatural causes. The White-tailed Eagle is a long-lived species that can easily live to be fifteen to twenty years old.

Connection zones
The research with transmitters shows that young White-tailed Eagles in the Netherlands regularly commute back and forth between important hotspots in the regions of the Northern and Central Netherlands, and the Sweet Delta. For the Central Netherlands there is an important connection on a landscape scale between the core areas in Flevoland and the Veluwe. Birds that reside in the Oostvaardersplassen regularly fly to the Veluwerandmeren and to areas on the Veluwe and back. The birds have to pass through the large-scale wind farms in Flevoland. Because the number of breeding pairs of White-tailed Eagles in the Netherlands is still increasing, the number of shuttle flights between nature reserves will also take place more frequently.

With the development of the Nieuw Land National Park, the important nature reserves of Lepelaarplassen, Oostvaardersplassen, Marker Wadden and Trintelzand will be scaled up and connected. White-tailed eagles already appear to exploit those areas in coherent food flights, in relation to the increasing populations of waterfowl they prey on. This also creates extra space for new breeding grounds for White-tailed Eagles and other birds of prey. Because the number of bird movements is expected to increase, both existing and planned wind farms will become a growing problem as a result of the additional expected deaths due to collisions with turbines. Other developments, such as the opening of Lelystad airport for large aircraft, will also pose an increasing risk in this regard.

Collision risks in Flevoland
To investigate collision risks, ‘high-resolution data’ is used to accurately map three-dimensional flight behaviour. In addition to geolocation, flight altitude is also registered. Recent research into the risks in Flevoland, commissioned by the province, shows that for a large part of the flight time, white-tailed eagles flying through Flevoland fly at ‘dangerous heights’, ie within reach of the increasingly higher wind turbines.

In the environmental impact assessment of Windpark Zeewolde it was still assumed that effects on White-tailed Eagles could be excluded in advance by a predicted “very limited number of flight movements”, but the transmitter data show a different picture. Although the movements of the Sea Eagles are concentrated in the Oostvaardersplassen and on and around the Randmeren, risky flights also regularly take place in the Flevoland polders. This has now been confirmed by the victims found – in the past four years two White-tailed Eagles were found as victims of a collision with a turbine in Windpark Zeewolde. That is a minimum number because, in the absence of victim monitoring, most birds will not be found.
News Fox-24

No trouble finding this wind industry victim at Waterloo SA.

Originally posted at ClimateREALISM

By Linnea Lueken – March 31, 2022

Inside Climate News recently published an article discussing a new model which warns of an impending global food production drop due to climate change. Climate models have proven notoriously bad at describing reality, and data collected during the recent warming show crop production is regularly setting new records; the very opposite of the food production apocalypse Inside Climate News is warning of.

The article, “Complex Models Now Gauge the Impact of Climate Change on Global Food Production. The Results Are ‘Alarming,’” says that there is a looming climate-caused global food crash that is projected to occur sooner than previously believed. The research depends entirely on agricultural projection models that depend upon the outputs of unreliable climate change models to make their projections.

The paper, “Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models,” presents the projections of a series of model runs comparing different crops around the globe based on the most recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) climate scenarios.

It uses two climate models, or representative concentration pathways (RCPs)—RCP2.60, and the discredited RCP8.5. These models have been shown to run too hot, projecting rising temperatures that are, in the words of the scientists who work on the models, “implausibly fast.”

As discussed in a Climate Realism post, here, two recent peer reviewed studies found a large degree of bias towards warmer projections, and that the CMIP5 models warm 4 to 5 times faster than actual observed temperature data. McKitrick and Christy (2020) write in “Persuasive warming bias in CMIP6 tropospheric layers” that “[W]e see no improvement between the CMIP5 and the CMIP6 models.”

If the current models used for temperature prediction are not accurate, then the food production models that rely on them cannot be expected to be accurate either.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report relied heavily on these same temperature models, particularly the implausible RCP8.5, and has been widely criticized by scientists for doing so. Climate Realism discussed the recent report here, and found that the report contained a large amount of speculation and very little evidence based on measured data.

The authors of the study assert that even the high mitigation scenarios, like RCP2.6, will still cause global food production to “soon face fundamentally changed risk profiles,” which will necessitate adaptation and “risk management” in global farming practices.

Data, however, show that major food crops have enjoyed rising global production over at least the last 60 years, alongside rising carbon dioxide and modest warming.

As originally discussed in this Climate Realism post, here, The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has collected food production data from around the globe since 1961. For the staple crops, corn, wheat, and rice, this data shows significant rises in both overall production and yield per acre as the earth warms (see figures 1 and 2, below).

Corn, in particular, is discussed in the paper and cited by Inside Climate News as being threatened by global warming. However, during last few decades of warming, the FAO reports world corn production has risen by approximately 467 percent, and yields by more than 196 percent.

An analysis by Willis Eschenbach in a Climate Realism post here, broke down major food crops by country and average annual temperature, and found “the yields in the warmer countries are no better or worse than the yields in the cooler countries.”

This finding, along with the FAO data, suggests that the alarmism surrounding hotter temperatures and food production is unfounded.

As the popular saying in computer science goes: garbage in, garbage out. It is irresponsible and unethical to use unrealistic runaway warming scenarios to promote the idea that billions will starve from a climate change induced collapse of food production. This is especially true when one considers, as explored in more than 100 Climate Realism posts, real world data demonstrate higher carbon dioxide concentrations and the warmer planet are regularly producing record yields.

Linnea Lueken

https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/linnea-lueken

Linnea Lueken is a Research Fellow with the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy. While she was an intern with The Heartland Institute in 2018, she co-authored a Heartland Institute Policy Brief “Debunking Four Persistent Myths About Hydraulic Fracturing.”