In this new version, the idea that the famous body was only found due to recent warming after being under ice continuously for over 5000 years gets buried, so to speak. The sting in the tail is this: ‘the researchers also found evidence suggesting that Ötzi had not died where he was found in the gully — instead, he had been transported down the mountain by natural environmental processes’. If, as they say, he ‘had melted out of the ice many times’, those times must have occurred at various higher levels, suggesting greater warming then than we (so far) see today. This poses an awkward question or two for prevalent climate theories.
– – –
A small team of researchers affiliated with institutions in Norway, Sweden and Austria, has found evidence that suggests a flaw in the original story of how Ötzi (the Iceman) remained preserved for so long, says Phys.org.
In their paper published in the journal The Holocene, the group details what they describe as a more plausible explanation.
In 1991, a couple of German hikers came upon the remains of a man frozen in the ice in the Ötztal Alps. Testing of the remains showed the man to be from approximately 5,300 years ago.
Researchers also found wounds that suggested the man had been killed. Konrad Spindler, an Austrian archaeologist, published a theory to explain how Ötzi’s remains had managed to survive for so long.
He suggested the body had freeze dried and was then encased in ice beneath a glacier (and was protected from its movement by a gully), where he was preserved in cold storage for thousands of years. His remains were found only because of warming caused by climate change melting the ice in which he had been frozen.
Such a sequence of events meant that Ötzi’s experience was unique, and thus it was doubtful that others like him would ever be found.
In this new effort, the researchers disagree with almost every part of Spindler’s theory. The only part they believe to be true is the cause of death. They suggest instead that food in Ötzi’s belly demonstrates that he died in the spring, not the fall.
Also, study of the landscape showed that the remains had not been covered by a glacier, which suggests Ötzi had melted out of the ice many times; thus, there was no time capsule. There was also evidence that Ötzi had been immersed in water several times.
And that, the researchers suggest, indicates that Ötzi’s weapons and tools had been damaged by the elements, not by a struggle with an unknown foe.
And finally, the researchers also found evidence suggesting that Ötzi had not died where he was found in the gully—instead, he had been transported down the mountain by natural environmental processes.
Full article here.
– – –
Study: Ötzi, 30 years on: A reappraisal of the depositional and post-depositional history of the find (2022)
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
November 9, 2022 at 01:24PM