Let’s Make CO2 Great Again

Guest essay by Gregory Wrightstone

As the love affair with so-called green energy cools and “net zero” commitments to eliminate “carbon emissions” wane, we see glimmers of acknowledgment for the benefits of carbon dioxide. That’s right: More people are beginning to understand that the gas – widely demonized as a pollutant endangering Earth with excessive heat – is a life-giving substance needed in greater amounts.

U.S. voters know that President-elect Donald Trump has declared the Green New Deal a “scam” and promises to return common sense to environmental regulations and energy development. His return to office rests partly on that pledge.

In Europe, German politicians whose green fetish has produced economic decline face serious electoral challenges. And developing countries like India ignore “decarbonization” promises to aggressively develop coal mines and import more of the fuel to spur growth and eradicate poverty.

Less frequently reported is the story of carbon dioxide emissions greening the Earth and boosting crop production. Educating the public on the benefits of carbon dioxide is the mission of the CO2 Coalition, which I lead. We sponsor speakers and publish scientifically based materials for adults and children. Much of the information is about the role of CO2 as a beneficial greenhouse gas in moderating the extremes between daytime and nighttime temperatures and as a photosynthetic plant food.

“Fossil Fuels Are the Greenest Energy Sources” by Dr. Indur Goklany is an example of our work. Did you know that up to 50% of the globe has experienced an increase in vegetation and that 70% of the greening is attributed to plant fertilization by carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels? Or that nearly 200,000 square kilometers of the southern Sahara have been converted to a lush grassland from desert? 

Few have heard that doubling atmospheric CO2 from its current concentration of 420 ppm would significantly increase agricultural productivity and have little effect on the climate.

It appears that some of this knowledge has reached Canada because Alberta’s ruling Unified Conservative Party (UCP) recently approved a resolution that promotes the salutary effects of CO2 and endorses an outright rejection of the national government’s net zero policy.

“It is estimated that (atmospheric) CO2 levels need to be above 150 ppm (parts per million) to ensure the survival of plant life,” says the proposal for a resolution eventually adopted by the party. “The Earth needs more CO2 to support life and to increase plant yields, both of which will contribute to the health and prosperity of all Albertans.”

The UCP calls for abandoning CO2’sdesignation as a pollutant and for recognizing the gas as “a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.”

The UCP’s action was not well received by the likes of DeSmog, an online platform of climate alarmists, which called the party’s resolution “a brazen display of climate science denial that harkens back to the 1990s fossil fuel industry playbook.”

DeSmog reported that the UCP had credited the “notorious” CO2 Coalition as its source of information – much to our gratification,

Except for the politically connected in the climate industrial complex, the carbon footprint phobia of recent years is a threat to everybody’s economic wellbeing. But it is a direct assault on a place like Alberta.

Perhaps second only to the Canadian Rockies, the most distinguishing natural resource of the western province is its huge deposit of oil sands – the world’s fourth largest proven reserve of “black gold.” Employing nearly 140,000 people and generating $17 billion in royalties, the oil industry is valued by Albertans.

“The problem is net zero has become a shorthand for ‘leave it in the ground,’” says Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. She plans to fight “the federal government and a coalition of extreme environmentalists who want to stop the production of oil and gas altogether.”

It is a good day when we find ourselves on the side of people fighting for the freedom to prosper as they contribute to the atmospheric store of carbon dioxide that enriches ecosystems and engenders life.

To paraphrase Donald Trump: Let’s make CO2 great again.

Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist; executive director of the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Va.; author of “Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know” and “A Very Convenient Warming: How modest warming and more CO2 are benefiting humanity.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/NI3tE0l

November 25, 2024 at 08:06AM

Prestatyn DCNN 7418 – Foehn Effects, Car Park effects or Dramatic effects?

53.34160 -3.41204 Met Office assessed CIMO Class 4 Installed 1/1/1932

For the purposes of supplying data towards the historic temperature records, weather stations should be representative of the natural environment of their region. The principal objective of the WMO CIMO Classification is to ensure minimum standards are met for national and international comparison. The Met Office has classified this site as Class 4 and are no doubt “correct” to the measured minimum requirements. But are main roads and large car parks typical of any region outside urban areas?

A reminder of the distances involved is here:

I doubt the authors of these international standards anticipated such literal interpretations rather than common sense guidance – a main thoroughfare and large car park in a busy sea side tourism centre is hardly representative of anywhere other than the immediate artificial heat island. Even on a low traffic day this site is still surrounded by large areas of black tarmac and concrete areas as shown below. The often floodlit “crazy-golf” alongside is equally unnatural and disruptive. On busy summer season holidays the often static queuing traffic will only ever elevate temperatures.

There are, however, other topical issues relevant to this and other north Wales weather site readings.

The all time “record” temperature nationally for the 24th November was 17.2°C recorded in 1970 at Prestatyn. However, yesterday 24/11/2024, this record was broken at Class 5 “Topsy Turvey” Santon Downham

This day’s weather event was somewhat sensationalised by a representative of the Met Office

Marco implores his X audience “To all other weather accounts out there..never feel afraid to post on twitter through fear of receiving harsh, often unjustified comments. If you’ve got the evidence to support your point your views and opinions are as important and relevant as any one elses“

Well taking Marco up on his offer (I do feel I qualify as a “weather account”)…….following his online statement yesterday of “Incredibly mild start to the day and with 18C in places still this morning the previous date record of 17.2C Prestatyn 1970 has been smashed” I pointed out that on the 23rd November 1906 (118 years plus one day ago) a temperature of 20°C was recorded in Lairg Scotland and asked him why he was sensationalising ( “Prestatyn 1970 has been smashed”) what was well within historic ranges. He chose not to respond.

The issues with Prestatyn are straightforward. It is poorly sited and over generously claimed to be CIMO Class 4 (potential inaccuracy by siting of 2°C) when in reality the site is so site compromised by extraneous heat sources that it should be dismissed as Class 5 (potential inaccuracy by siting of 5°C) . Its data should not be used for the historic climate record. Additionally the area is well known to exhibit Foehn Effect. The Met Office over emphasizes such rare events as demonstrated both in north wales and at sites such as Achfary and Cassley . To add such dramatic and sensational “reporting” from senior Met Office officials indicates a modern culture of “Record chasing” rather than a balanced evaluation of events.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/wlhs0JG

November 25, 2024 at 06:23AM

COP 29 diplomacy delivers perfectly vague promises a decade away

The fiasco started when the developing countries demanded huge impossibly sums centered on $1.3 trillion.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/mkR4zHW

November 25, 2024 at 04:21AM

Matt McGrath Still Does Not Get It!

By Paul Homewood

h/t Paul Kolk

 

The absurd Matt McGrath still does not get it!

 

 image

COP29 is over, with developing countries complaining that the $300bn (about £240bn) a year in climate finance they will receive by 2035 is a "paltry sum".

Many of the rich country voices at the UN’s climate conference were amazed that developing nations were unhappy with what on the surface seems a huge settlement. It is an improvement – on the current contribution of $100bn (£79.8bn) a year.

However, the developing world, which had pushed for more, had many genuine issues with the final sum.

A massive deal, but bitter divisions remain

There were complaints it simply was not enough and that it was a mixture of grants and loans. And countries were deeply annoyed by the way the wealthy waited until the last minute to reveal their hand.

“It’s a paltry sum," India’s delegate Chandni Raina told other delegates, after the deal had been gavelled through.

"This document is little more than an optical illusion. This, in our opinion, will not address the enormity of the challenge we all face."

Ultimately, the developing world was compelled to accept it, with many rich countries pointing to next year’s arrival of President Donald Trump, a known climate sceptic, and arguing that they would not get a better deal.

But this package is also being criticised as short-sighted from the richer world’s perspective.

The argument runs that if you want to keep the world safe from rising temperatures, then wealthier nations need to help emerging economies cut their emissions, because that is where 75% of the growth in emissions has occurred in the past decade.

New national plans are due to be published next spring to outline how every country will limit their planet warming gases over the next 10 years.

A more generous cash settlement at COP29 would undoubtedly have had a positive knock-on effect on those efforts.

And at a time of geopolitical uncertainty and distraction, keeping countries united on climate should be critical. The big fight over money re-opened old divisions between rich and poor, with an anger and bitterness I have not seen in years.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp35rrvv2dpo

 

Why does McGrath still not realise that the rest of the world don’t give a toss about emissions, and have no interest at all in giving up fossil fuels?

They have already been handed $100 billion a year, and what difference has that made?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/CvIMUdu

November 25, 2024 at 04:17AM