EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin taking action to roll back some of the environmental and climate craziness that’s been going on for the last couple of decades.
via CFACT
March 25, 2025 at 03:38AM
Living in cold weather regions can reduce life expectancy by up to two years, whereas living in climates with hotter-than-optimal summers has almost no effect on reduced life expectancy.
New Study Finds The Post-1980s Warming Trend Has Improved European Life Expectancy
via climate science
March 25, 2025 at 02:31AM
“… our legislative leaders think that the answer to overcoming renewable subsidies is to give subsidies to everyone else.” (- Bill Peacock, below)
Subsidized wind and solar power–dilute, intermittent, and fragile–wounded the Texas grid (ERCOT, covering 90 percent of the state), resulting in the greatest Blackout in the history of U.S. electricity back in February 2021. With the tricked grid continuing to attract inferior energies, Texas politicians have tried to wrong a wrong into a right. Instead of halting the cancers in the system (wind, solar, and battery investments), the Republicans are now subsidizing new capacity from natural gas technologies as well as nuclear fission. (New nuclear plants are a real stretch, but Texas can lose a few billion taxpayer dollars, right?)
The latest? Bill Peacock reports:
Yesterday, Rep. Cody Harris filed House Bill 14 that would establish the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Program. Among other things, this would provide state subsidies for the building of nuclear energy generation of electricity in Texas. Gov. Gregg Abbott has made this one of his priorities.
The program follows in the footsteps of the Texas Energy Fund created in 2023 by the Legislature and funded with $5 billion. The funding level for the nuclear energy fund has not yet been revealed, but the proposed Texas budget already has another $5 billion set aside for the Energy Fund, which provides subsidies for natural gas generation plants.
Peacock gets to the underlying problem.
Where the federal government is cutting corporate welfare, it is big business in Texas. The push for these energy subsidies stems from the unwillingness of the Texas Legislature—unlike President Trump—to eliminate subsidies for the “Green New Scam” despite the fact that renewable energy is gutting the reliability of the Texas electric grid. Instead, our legislative leaders think that the answer to overcoming renewable subsidies is to give subsidies to everyone else.
Two wrongs do not make a right. All subsidies for all energies should immediately cease, federal and state. Texas should not add any new wind, solar, or battery capacity nor subsidize transmission access for the same. Existing wind, solar, and battery facilities should be retired as they wear out or otherwise underperform. A real free market requires a phaseout of ERCOT in favor of nonregulated utilities assuming the supply function, a story for another day.
The post Nuclear Subsidies in Texas? Ouch! appeared first on Master Resource.
via Master Resource
March 25, 2025 at 01:09AM
By Kennedy Maize
“Since its 2009 formation under Obama, ARPA-E within the U.S. Department of Energy has awarded about $4.2 billion to some 1,700 energy projects. The latest nuclear revival continues a long string of starts-and-stops for a technology that has been more promise than performance.”
Energy Secretary Chris Wright and the White House appear to be headed for a clash on major DOE spending programs, including the agency’s Loan Programs Office and the main research arm, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-Energy).
Last week, DOE earmarked another $57.8 billion in federal money to the Palisades nuclear plant resurrection in Michigan, part of a $1.52 DOE billion loan to Holtec International for the project.
Since DOE’s Loan Programs Office approved the deal last September, the agency has doled out almost $96 million for the restart of the 805-MW reactor that shut down in 2022, starting with $38 million this January.
The Biden administration and two Democratic Michigan governors, Gretchen Whitmer and her predecessor, Jennifer Granholm, who was also Biden’s energy secretary, were important parts of the impetus behind the Palisades subsidy. Despite this prehistory, Wright said: “Today’s action is yet another step toward advancing President Trump’s commitment to increase domestic energy production, bolster our security and lower costs for the American people.”
As keynote speaker at ARPA-E’s annual “summit” meeting at a Maryland resort, Wright touted the technology (modeled on the DOD’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) as essential in the AI race in terms of U.S. national defense and medical science.
The only way we can get there is if we grow our energy system faster and faster, and that’s why you are all here. There is a huge, life-changing opportunity for innovation there.
Since its 2009 formation under Obama, ARPA-E has awarded about $4.2 billion to some 1,700 energy projects. The latest nuclear revival continues a long string of starts-and-stops for a technology that has been more promise than performance., from “too cheap to meter” in 1954 to George W. Bush’s Energy Policy Act of 2005 allocating $2 billion for up to six new reactor projects.
Fiscal Prudency?
On January 28, the White House’s Office of Management and budget produced a 52-page spreadsheet (obtained by Bloomberg) listing targets for a spending axe or Elon Musk’s chain saw. Among the myriad targets: DOE’s Loan Program Office and ARPA-E. The next day, a federal judge issued a temporary hold on those program cuts, which expired in February. No cuts have been made to date.
The DOE press release on the Palisades funds characterized the financing as a “loan guarantee,” a term the federal government and Congress stole in 2005 to imply that Uncle Sam was simply backstopping private sector money. The aim was to free up money for the construction of new nuclear plants after the first generation had fizzled out. But the solons didn’t want it to look like they were risking taxpayer dollars, which they were.
That didn’t work – as the outrageously expensive new Vogtle units in Georgia and the failed V.C. Summer project in South Carolina demonstrated.
A conventional loan guarantee, as defined by Investopedia, is “a type of loan in which a third party agrees to pay if the borrower should default.” DOE’s “loan guarantees” are loans, much like car loans. The borrower provides a down payment of 20% and DOE picks up the rest. The loans are approved by the Treasury Department and disbursed by Treasury’s Federal Financing Bank, which also collects loan payments.
According to the Code of Federal Regulations, “The full faith and credit of the United States is pledged to the payment of principal and interest.” If a borrower defaults on principal or interest payments, and “such default has not been cured within the applicable grace period, the (Treasury) Secretary shall notify the Attorney General.”
Political Controversy
The DOE loan authorities have come under fire since the 2011 collapse of the advanced solar photovoltaic firm Solyndra, leaving the Obama administration holding a bag containing a $527 million default.
A 2012 monograph from the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center – Pure Risk: Federal Clean Energy Loan Guarantees – offered a series of critiques of the loan guarantees, especially for nuclear plants. NPEC Executive Director Henry Sokolski wrote in a foreword:
This volume spotlights the costs and risks associated with federal clean energy loan guarantees….They point to the half billion dollars Solyndra has already cost U.S. taxpayers.
In 2017, Rep. Randy Weber (R-Texas) and four other hard-right House conservatives – Mark Meadows of North Carolina, Pete Sessions of Texas, Gary Palmer of Alabama, and Jim Jordan of Ohio – introduced legislation to “amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal certain loan guarantee programs of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes.” It went nowhere.
The Heritage Foundation’s 2023 book Mandate for Leadership Project 2025 – which Trump disdained during the campaign and has frequently attempted to implement once in office – says the “DOE Loan Program should be eliminated or reformed,” along with a list of other DOE subsidy programs including the “DOE Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED); Office of State and Community Energy Programs; ARPA-E; Office of Grid Deployment (OGD).”
Euthanizing of those DOE programs would require congressional action, which is unlikely.
False Promises Perennial Hopes
Vaclav Smil [Energy Myths and Realities (AEI Press, 2010)] has described nuclear fission as a “successful failure.” On the positive side: ““Nuclear fission is a reliable, high-capacity, high load mode of electricity generation, which makes it an ideal complement to various renewable conservation modes that still have mostly low-capacity, moderate-load, and unpredictably intermittent operations.” But instead of meeting expectations, he adds, “nuclear power has fulfilled only a fraction of its original promise.” [1]
Trump 47’s DOE needs to think through nuclear policy from the ground up.
[1] Vaclav Smil, Energy Myths and Realities (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2010), pp, 42, 40, 32.
———————-
This is a slightly revised version of what was originally posted at The Quad Report, the blog site of electricity expert Kennedy Maize. Other posts by Maize at MasterResource are here.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
via Watts Up With That?
March 25, 2025 at 12:05AM
