By Daniel Turner

The Biden Administration spent hundreds of billions of dollars to push renewables, and the result was a 30% increase in national utility prices. And yet, despite producing, (intermittent and expensive) electricity, no amount of wind and solar can make rubber or plastic or the millions of products we use, nor can they forge steel or produce cement. Yes, we need more electricity, but the Biden team was determined to be anti-fossil fuels in their push for more electricity, why was nuclear technology left out of the conversation?

There is no imminent replacement for fossil fuels in the production of petrochemical products, but for electricity needs, America stands on the brink of a nuclear energy revolution. Advanced nuclear technology and small modular reactors (SMRs) are proving to be game changers.

Similar to the war on coal and the ongoing attacks on oil and gas, nuclear has the same set of radical activists looking to thwart America’s advancement. President Obama’s former Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Gregory Jaczko, famously anti-nuclear, at a recent CERAweek conference, was presented as an objective expert on these future technologies, like having a beef panel moderated by vegans. 

As NRC Chairman, Jaczko made it his mission to shut down nuclear innovation at every turn. He voted against opening any new nuclear power plants and famously went so far as to call for a global ban on nuclear power. It is frustrating enough Jaczko had the power to curtail nuclear power in America. Giving him a platform to continue to promote his extreme views is baffling. 

Fortunately, America has an opportunity to turn the page on this anti-energy agenda and fully embrace a new era of nuclear power. In President Donald J. Trump’s first term, he laid the groundwork for innovation-friendly policies that encourage the development of next-generation nuclear technologies. Now, we have the chance to break free from the bureaucratic roadblocks of the past and usher in a golden age of nuclear energy.

Oklo, a company out of California, has signed agreements to deploy SMRs to operate data centers so America continues to lead the world on AI and not cede ground to China. We need greater electricity production for manufacturing and industrialization, for expanded housing in cities and suburbs, for commercial, farm, and residential use. The only thing standing in the way? Outdated regulations, bureaucratic inertia, and the ideological opposition of people like Jaczko.

We’ve seen this playbook before. The same activists who falsely claim to support “green energy” are actually lobbyists promoting unreliable wind and solar as the only acceptable energy options—ignoring their massive land use, supply chain problems, and dependency on rare earth minerals from adversarial nations like China. Nuclear power, on the other hand, provides a stable energy source with a far smaller environmental footprint, and we have all the raw materials here in America. 

President Trump has a chance to champion this cause once again, cutting through the red tape that has long plagued nuclear development. By prioritizing streamlined regulatory approvals, supporting research into next-generation reactors, and pushing back against fear mongering anti-nuclear activists, his administration can unleash the full potential of American energy innovation.

Nuclear needs American raw materials and an American workforce. Nuclear expansion, along with President Trump’s call to reopen natural gas and clean coal plants, will bring electricity costs back down to inexpensive levels after four years of disastrous Biden energy policies. 

The future of nuclear power is bright, but only if we allow progress to happen. It’s time to reject the failed policies of the past and embrace the energy solutions that will power our future. The golden age of nuclear energy is here—if we’re willing to seize it.

Daniel Turner is the founder and executive director of Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs. Contact him at daniel@powerthefuture.com and follow him on Twitter @DanielTurnerPTF

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.

The volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991 led to a significant cooling of the tropical ocean surface due to the cloud belt formed by the eruption. ​ This cooling resulted in a temporary reduction in the rate of increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. ​

Despite ongoing human CO2 emissions and natural sources of CO2, the cooling effect caused by the volcanic aerosols led to a rapid absorption of CO2 by the ocean.  At least that is an important conclusion of a study by my friend and chemist, Bud Bromley.

Bud’s study demonstrates that the oceans have a tremendous capacity to absorb large amounts of CO2 – much more than is emitted by humans. ​

This absorption, after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo, was followed by a rapid recovery and acceleration of CO2 levels once the cooling effect dissipated.

I’m going to be interviewing Bud Bromley next month, specifically at 6pm Hawai’i time on Thursday, 24^th April (2pm Brisbane-time the next day, Friday April 25^th).  This will be the fourth zoom meeting in my series Towards a New Theory of Climate Change.   If you would like to be a part of this Webinar please register at:

https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_QrVa8XEzSPS_GvUWnXkX0Q

You will then be sent a confirmation email with a link that you will need to join the webinar, so please file the confirmation email carefully.

Bud lives in Hawai’i and is a chemist by training.  He blogs at  https://budbromley.blog/

Bud concluded from this Pinatubo study that human CO2 emissions are not causing the increase in atmospheric CO2. The amount of human CO2 emissions is negligible, less than a rounding error, considering the total carbon budget of the Earth.

To be sure, Bud is of the considered opinion that contrary to what you have probably read, heard or been taught, the addition of human produced CO2 to the atmosphere by burning natural gas, oil and coal does not increase the global CO2 concentration of the atmosphere. Nor will sequestration of CO2 reduce CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

According to Bud, the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere today is the same as it would be if humans never existed.  Ouch.

Life goes on in the oceans, and at coral reefs the fish and the corals are more affected by the sea tides that are a consequence of the gravitational pull of the Sun and the Moon.  As we develop a new theory of climate change it is important that we have words for describing important processes.  Let me suggest that the sea tides be considered external drivers unaffected by occasional events such as volcanic eruptions; such is the nature of external drivers.   Then there are internal state variables such as temperature that are affected by volcanic eruptions – and there are feedback mechanisms such that the rate of increase in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide is hardly affected.